Review article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/354
Affiliation: MD/ PhD/ FACC Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Harvard Medical School, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Camilo Fernández Bravo, Affiliation: MD/ PhD/ FACC Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Citation: Camilo F. Bravo, (2026), Aldosterone-Mediated Cardiovascular Remodeling and Multisystem Injury: Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Biomarker-Guided Risk Stratification, and the Expanding Therapeutic Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Across the Spectrum of Cardiometabolic and Cardiorenal Disease, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 9(6); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/354
Copyright: © 2026, Camilo F. Bravo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 March 2026 | Accepted: 13 April 2026 | Published: 20 April 2026
Keywords: aldosterone; mineralocorticoid receptor; cardiovascular remodeling; cardiorenal syndrome; biomarkers; finerenone; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; heart failure; chronic kidney disease; type 2 diabetes
Aldosterone, a key mineralocorticoid hormone, extends beyond its traditional role in regulating sodium and potassium homeostasis to profoundly influence pathological processes in cardiovascular, renal, metabolic, and immune systems. Chronic aldosterone excess, often seen in conditions like primary aldosteronism, heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and obesity, activates mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) in non-classical tissues, triggering genomic and non-genomic pathways that culminate in fibrosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, vascular stiffness, and cellular hypertrophy. These mechanisms drive multisystem injury, accelerating the progression of cardiometabolic and cardiorenal diseases, including HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This comprehensive review delves into the intricate pathophysiological cascades, emphasizing aldosterone’s role in cardiorenal crosstalk and metabolic dysregulation. Biomarker-guided risk stratification, utilizing tools such as the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), galectin-3, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), facilitates early detection, prognostication, and personalized therapeutic interventions. The therapeutic landscape has evolved from steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) like spironolactone and eplerenone, which demonstrated mortality benefits in HFrEF trials (e.g., RALES, EPHESUS, EMPHASIS-HF), to non-steroidal MRAs such as finerenone, which offer enhanced cardiorenal protection with a favorable safety profile regarding hyperkalemia in CKD with T2DM (FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD) and HFmrEF/HFpEF (FINEARTS-HF, FINE-HEART). Emerging agents, including aldosterone synthase inhibitors (e.g., baxdrostat), and precision medicine approaches incorporating MR polymorphisms, multi-omics data, and artificial intelligence-driven algorithms, herald future advancements. This article advocates for an integrated, multidisciplinary framework to optimize outcomes in the cardiometabolic-cardiorenal continuum, addressing implementation barriers in diverse populations.
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a pivotal neurohormonal axis that orchestrates fluid-electrolyte balance, blood pressure regulation, and vascular tone under physiological conditions. however, in pathological states, sustained aldosterone
elevation—either primary (e.g., Conn’s syndrome) or secondary (e.g., due to HF, CKD, or metabolic syndrome)—induces maladaptive responses independent of hemodynamic effects. [0] Epidemiological evidence underscores that hyperaldosteronism correlates with heightened risks of cardiovascular events, renal progression, and mortality, even at subclinical levels when renin is suppressed. [1] For instance, in the Framingham Offspring Study, elevated aldosterone levels predicted incident hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), while the PREVEND cohort linked aldosterone to accelerated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline. [2]
This narrative review synthesizes preclinical, translational, and clinical data on aldosterone-mediated injury, expanding on molecular mechanisms, biomarker integration for risk assessment, and the broadening indications for MRAs. We explore subgroup analyses from landmark trials, real-world evidence, and emerging therapies, emphasizing sex-specific, racial, and socioeconomic disparities. The goal is to foster biomarker-driven, precision-based strategies that mitigate cardiometabolic-cardiorenal morbidity and mortality.
Epidemiology and Clinical Burden
Globally, HF affects over 64 million individuals, with cardiorenal comorbidities amplifying risks: up to 50% of HF patients have CKD, and vice versa, yielding a 2-3-fold increase in mortality. [4] In T2DM, aldosterone excess exacerbates insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and microvascular damage, contributing to a 40-50% lifetime risk of DKD. [0] Primary aldosteronism, prevalent in 5-10% of hypertensives, confers a 4-fold higher cardiovascular risk than essential hypertension. [3] These intersections underscore the need for holistic management.
Figure 1: Detailed schematic of aldosterone/MR signaling pathways in cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic cells.
Left panel: Genomic pathway—aldosterone binds cytosolic MR, undergoes conformational change, dissociates from chaperones (e.g., HSP90), dimerizes, and translocates to the nucleus, recruiting coactivators (SRC-1, PGC-1α) to bind mineralocorticoid response elements (MREs) on genes like SGK1, ENaC, TGF-β1, collagen I/III, PAI-1, CTGF, and galectin-3. Middle panel: Non-genomic pathway—rapid signaling via membrane-associated MR or GPR30, activating Src, PI3K/Akt, ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, JNK, NADPH oxidase (Nox2/4), and mitochondrial ROS production, leading to NF-κB translocation, NLRP3 inflammasome assembly, and cytokine release (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α). Right panel: Crosstalk with RAAS, insulin signaling (IRS-1 phosphorylation), and adipokine pathways (adiponectin suppression). Cell-type specificity: cardiomyocytes (hypertrophy via calcineurin-NFAT), fibroblasts (myofibroblast transition), endothelial cells (eNOS uncoupling, ICAM-1/VCAM-1 upregulation), podocytes (nephrin downregulation), and macrophages (M1 polarization). Color-coded arrows indicate amplification loops (e.g., ROS-mediated MR stabilization); molecular structures of aldosterone, MR domains (NTD, DBD, LBD), and inhibitors (spironolactone, finerenone) included. (Complex multi-panel vector illustration with zoomable insets for key interactions; BioRender-style with quantitative gene expression fold-changes from preclinical models.)
Classical and Non-Classical Roles of Aldosterone
Aldosterone is synthesized in the adrenal zona glomerulosa via cytochrome P450 aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2), stimulated by angiotensin II, potassium, and adrenocorticotropic hormone. In epithelial tissues (e.g., distal nephron), 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2) inactivates
cortisol, ensuring MR specificity for aldosterone. In non-epithelial sites (heart, vessels, kidney mesangium, brain, adipose, immune cells), low 11β-HSD2 allows cortisol or oxidative stress to co-activate MR, amplifying injury. 
Genomic Signaling
Upon binding, MR translocates to the nucleus, modulating >100 genes involved in ion transport (ENaC, SGK1), fibrosis (TGF-β1, CTGF, PAI-1), and inflammation (MCP-1, IL-6). In fibroblasts, this promotes extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, perivascular fibrosis, and stiffness.  Epigenetic modifications, such as histone acetylation via p300/CBP, sustain profibrotic transcription.
Non-Genomic Signaling
Rapid effects (<15>
Cardiovascular Remodeling
In cardiomyocytes, MR activation induces hypertrophy through GATA4, cardiotrophin-1, and disrupted circadian rhythms (e.g., PER1/CLOCK dysregulation). Fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition yields collagen-rich scars, impairing diastolic function—central to HFpEF pathogenesis.  Vascular effects include smooth muscle proliferation, calcification (RUNX2 upregulation), and plaque instability via MMP-9. Preclinical models (e.g., uninephrectomized rats on high-salt diet) show aldosterone-induced LVH and fibrosis reversible by MRAs.
Renal Injury and Cardiorenal Crosstalk
Aldosterone promotes glomerular hyperfiltration, mesangial expansion, and podocytopathy (synaptopodin loss). Tubular effects involve epithelial-mesenchymal transition, interstitial fibrosis via SGK1-mediated Na+ retention, and acid-base disturbances.  In cardiorenal syndrome types 1-5, bidirectional signaling (e.g., renal venous congestion activating RAAS, cardiac natriuretic peptides countering aldosterone) perpetuates cycles of congestion, ischemia, and fibrosis.
Metabolic and Inflammatory Dimensions
In adipocytes, MR suppresses adiponectin and browning, fostering insulin resistance and lipotoxicity.  Immune modulation includes macrophage polarization (M1 via NLRP3), T-cell activation, and dendritic cell maturation, amplifying systemic inflammation. Oxidative stress from mitochondrial dysfunction and Nox-derived ROS links to DNA damage and senescence.

Figure 2: Comprehensive multisystem injury atlas of aldosterone excess. Central hub: adrenal aldosterone production with feedback loops from RAAS, SNS, and metabolic stressors. Radial spokes to organs: heart (LVH, fibrosis, arrhythmia substrate with ECG insets); vasculature (endothelial dysfunction, stiffness with pulse wave velocity metrics, plaque rupture); kidney (glomerular sclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis with biopsy micrographs, hyperfiltration equation); adipose/metabolic (visceral fat accumulation, insulin resistance with HOMA-IR scales); immune system (inflammasome activation, cytokine storm with multiplex assay data); brain (sympathetic surge, BBB permeability with MRI contrasts). Quantitative overlays: hazard ratios for outcomes (e.g., HR 2.5 for CV events in hyperaldosteronism); heatmaps of tissue-specific MR expression from GTEx database; sodium/potassium amplification factors. Interactive elements: clickable pathways for sub-mechanisms. (High-resolution infographic with 3D organ models, scalable risk gradients, and evidence annotations.)
Sex and Racial Differences
Women exhibit greater aldosterone sensitivity due to estrogen-MR interactions, while African Americans have higher prevalence of resistant hypertension linked to aldosterone excess, influencing trial generalizability.
Biomarker-Guided Risk Stratification
Biomarkers reflect aldosterone’s downstream effects, enabling early intervention. ARR >30 (ng/dL per ng/mL/h) screens for primary aldosteronism and predicts remodeling in normotensives.  Cardiac (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) indicate myocyte stress; fibrosis markers (galectin-3 >17.8 ng/mL, sST2 >35 ng/mL) prognosticate HF progression in CKD.   Inflammatory (GDF-15 >1800 pg/mL) and mineral (FGF-23 >100 RU/mL) markers link to cardiorenal outcomes. 
Multi-Marker Scores
Machine learning integrates biomarkers (e.g., TOPCAT sub-analysis: 49-analyte panel predicting HF events).  Thresholds adjust for eGFR, age, and comorbidities.

Table 1: Expanded biomarkers for aldosterone-mediated injury, including biological roles, thresholds, prognostic metrics, and assay considerations. 
Figure 3: Advanced flowchart for biomarker-guided stratification and therapy escalation. Start: Patient entry (T2DM/CKD/HF suspicion) → Initial panel (ARR, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) → If elevated (>thresholds) → Secondary panel (galectin-3, sST2, GDF-15, FGF-23) → Risk tiers (low: monitor annually; intermediate: imaging/echo; high: urgent MRA/SGLT2i initiation)
→ Branching decisions: eGFR <45>5.0 (binders), comorbidities (e.g., obesity: GLP-1RA). Loops for 3–6-month re-assessment, AI-predicted trajectories, and cost-effectiveness nodes. (Detailed decision-tree with probability branches, guideline icons (ESC/AHA), and integration with wearables/omics.)
Expanding Therapeutic Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Steroidal MRAs: Foundational Evidence
Spironolactone (RALES: 30% mortality reduction in severe HFrEF; HR 0.70) and eplerenone (EPHESUS: post-MI HFrEF; EMPHASIS-HF: mild HFrEF) established MRAs as Class I therapy, but hyperkalemia (up to 12%) limits use in CKD.  
Non-Steroidal MRAs: Finerenone’s Paradigm Shift
Finerenone’s bulky structure confers tissue selectivity, shorter half-life, and balanced cardiac-renal distribution, reducing hyperkalemia.  FIDELIO-DKD (n=5734, CKD 2-4 + T2DM): kidney composite HR 0.82; CV composite HR 0.86.  FIGARO-DKD (n=7437): CV composite HR 0.87, HF hosp HR 0.71.  FINEARTS-HF (n=6001, HFmrEF/HFpEF): CV
death/HF hosp HR 0.84.  FINE-HEART pooled: consistent benefits across eGFR strata.
Table 2: Comprehensive summary of pivotal MRA trials, including subgroups and safety.
Figure 4. Meta-analysis forest plot of MRA effects on cardiorenal outcomes. Horizontal lines: individual trial HRs with 95% CIs; diamonds: pooled estimates for steroidal vs non-steroidal MRAs. Subgroups: by EF (HFrEF vs HFpEF), eGFR (<60> Combination Therapies and Safety
MRAs synergize with SGLT2i (e.g., DAPA-HF/DELIVER: additive HF benefits) and GLP-1RAs for metabolic control.  Hyperkalemia management: potassium binders (patiromer, SZC). In dialysis, MRAs reduce CV mortality (HR 0.38-0.87).

Table 3. Pharmacological comparison of steroidal vs non-steroidal MRAs, including PK/PD and indications.

Figure 5: 3D molecular docking of MRAs to MR ligand-binding domain (PDB: 2OAX). Surface renderings: spironolactone (partial overlap with progesterone receptor), finerenone (steric hindrance at helix 12). Heatmaps: organ accumulation ratios from rodent PK studies; curves: plasma concentration vs time, K+ elevation simulations. Binding affinities (Kd: spironolactone 24 nM, finerenone 18 nM). (Multi-panel computational figure with energy minimization data

Figure 6. Mechanistic before-after infographic of MRA effects. Panels: pre-treatment (elevated fibrosis/ROS markers); post-treatment (reductions in galectin-3, NT-proBNP); bar graphs from trials (e.g., 20% UACR drop); pathway interruptions (MR blockade icons). Outcome icons: reduced HF hosp icons with ARR. (Illustrative diagram with trend lines and biomarker kinetics.)

Figure 7: Precision medicine algorithm for MRA optimization. Nodes: genomics (NR3C2 SNPs, CYP11B2 variants), proteomics (baseline ARR/galectin-3), clinical (eGFR, K+). Branches: MRA selection (steroidal vs non-steroidal), dosing (AI-titration), combos (SGLT2i/ASI). Dashboards: risk prediction models, monitoring intervals. (Flowchart with ML integration, probabilistic outcomes.)
MRAs’ benefits extend to HF prevention in at-risk populations (e.g., FIDELITY: 14% CV risk reduction).  Challenges: underutilization (30-50% in eligible HFrEF), hyperkalemia in CKD, cost in LMICs. Future: ASIs (baxdrostat phase III), gene editing, nanoparticle delivery.
Aldosterone-driven pathology is modifiable via biomarkers and MRAs, promising paradigm shifts in cardiometabolic-cardiorenal care.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,