AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/098
1Rosad Neurodegenerative Disease Research Institue, Jos, Nigeria. University of Medical Science Teaching Hospital, Ondo.
2University of Medical Science Teaching Hospital, Ondo.
3University of Jos, Plateau, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Opeyemi Oluwasanmi Adeloye, Rosad Neurodegenerative Disease Research Institue, Jos, Nigeria. University of Medical Science Teaching Hospital, Ondo.
Citation: Opeyemi O Adeloye, O Idowu, S Olawuwo, Oyeneyin B David. (2021) Aerobics Exercise in Two Post Parkinson’s Disease Care: Effective Treatment among Group Exercise Versus Individual Supervised Exercise. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/098
Copyright: © This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 28 November 2020 | Accepted: 30 December 2020 | Published: 07 January 2021
Keywords: therapeutic exercise; motor and non-motor symptoms; balance; parkinson´s disease
Objective
To compare group supervised exercise (GE) and individual exercise (IE) in a hospital setting, in terms of improvement in quality of life, gait and balance and social interaction.
Study Design and Setting
This was a prospective cohort study in Jos (Plateau State)
Participants
Sixty seven patients completed the outcome data.
Measures
Daily activities were measured by the bartel index, tinetti scale (balance and gait), short form SF-36 health survey to compare quality of life.
Results
No statically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the symptoms of PD. After exercise supervised by physiotherapist both group showed significant improvement from each measurement. These improvements were better in individual than group supervised exercise patient with all functionality scales with a smaller margin.
Conclusion
Individual supervised exercise is more effective than group supervised exercise in term of improvement in quality of life, activities of daily living, gait and balance and social interaction.
Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive chronic nervous system disease resulted from decrease in amount of dopamine production in substantia nigra. Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorders. PD commoner age is 55 years above, the risk related more with increase in age. Symptoms PD characterized primarily by rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia, speech changes, writing changes and postural instability.
Literatures suggested that therapeutic exercise improve quality of life in Parkinson disease. Available studies indicate that therapeutic protocol has to focus on: cueing strategies, balance, cognitive movement strategies and improved physical capacity. Motor training exercise for PD patients have been designed and evaluated but only specific training strategies tailored for each patient, may produce improvements in gait speed and stride length, decrease motor and balance symptoms and improve quality of life. Furthermore, therapeutic exercise such as balance and coordination training may improve muscle trophism and postural balance and strength. Aerobics exercise such walking, dancing, jugging and biking has therapeutic effect in patient improvement. It seems reasonable to state that tailored therapeutic exercise is the physical activities that is structure, planned and repetitive and condition for any part of the body which is a valid tool to be included in the therapeutic program of PD patients, considering that this therapeutic exercise may alieviate the symptoms as well as the overall physical incapacity, reduce the risk of falls and injuries, and ultimately improve quality of life and social interaction (Adeloye O.O et al)
The aim of this study was to compare group exercise (GE) and individual outpatient hospital supervised exercise (IE) in terms of improvement of the functional abilities and quality of life who have suffered Parkinson disease. We hypothesized that individual exercise supervised by physiotherapist is more effective than group outpatient supervised exercise to improve quality of life.
Design
This study was based on a prospective cohort study in the department of physiotherapy Rosad Parkinson disease research, initiative and foundation. Jos in the period of November 2017 to October 2018. This Rosad is nongovernmental organization specialized on Parkinson disease research and care. They care and research for the management of Parkinson disease.
Subject of study
Patients were consecutively recruited by the neurologist in the neurology unit at Jos university teaching hospital, Plateau State specialist hospital Jos for Rosad Parkinson after diagnosed with PD. The subject used is stable to carry out the exercise. The number of subject required for this study was calculated across a sample of patient who performs the group and individual exercise from Nov. 2017 to October 2018, included in a previous study in patient with similar characteristics, using epidata software version 3.1, for comparison of independent averages. A standard deviation was obtained from initial and final bartel score, 43.788 recorded for the first group (IE)) and 32.993 for the second group (GE); the mean detected was 11.710; considering for calculation a ratio among samples of 1, a confidence level of 95% and a power of 80%. The result showed a minimum sample size of 21 patients; considering a possible loss of 10%, the number of subject to recruit would be 20 patient group category (GE) and 20 individual patient category (IE). The aerobic exercises of 45mins performed thrice in a week
Inclusion and Exclusion
Inclusion criteria were patients who were referred for physiotherapy from Jos university teaching Hospital and Plateau State specialist Hospital Jos. Generally, the requirements for referral to improve the patient wellbeing. Stable patient for exercise are referred by the neurologist.
Exclusion criteria for both exercise were: the patient could travel by himself, or was not considered in a dependent state in terms of activities of daily (ADL) Barthel index score of 91 or better); no exercise or physiotherapy acceptability by the patient has been performed at a different institution, lack of cooperation from the patient or caregivers; severe cognitive impairment leading to failure to understand and act upon instructions; inability to speak and understand English language; patient with terminal disease,
The treatment was selected by a rehabilitation physician basis of the need for assistance in balance and gait, quality of life and social interaction. The characteristics of patient and availability of social and family support, in accordance with the rehabilitation guideline of primary healthcare Nigeria
The total sample was composed of 67 patients; 34 of which constituted the group exercise and 33 of the individual group in the Physiotherapy department at Rosad Neurodegerative disease Research institute. The enrolment for the study is described and all patients provided written informed consent before treatment in accordance with the Jos university teaching hospital declaration. This study was approved by the scientific ethics committee of the Jos university teaching hospital and Plateau state specialist Hospital research commission and adhered to the guidelines of the international of medical journal editors.
Outcome Measures
Baseline and premobid characteristic were recorded at the time of enrollment. To determine the impact of group exercise or individual exercise on functional independence
Achieved significant difference, various validated scales were used: the Barthel Index to measure ADLs, the Canadian Neurological Scale to assess mental state, and the Tinetti Scale to assess balance and gait. The SF-36 was used to compare the quality of life of the two groups of patients.
All subjects were assessed by an external physiotherapist who did not participate in the supervision of the exercise within the first week after the diagnosed of Parkinson disease and after the end of training rehabilitation. Other secondary variables analyzed were the rehabilitative goals, the number of sessions, and the number of hospital readmissions.
Therapeutic exercise Process
Many literatures show that therapeutic exercise must start as soon as a diagnosis is established; a medical test needs to be carried out to confirm patient is eligible for exercise before recruited to this program. In the brain, the deficit caused by limited dopamine is usually fesonating ( tropism), and enabling techniques are used, such as the dancing-play therapy that counteracts involuntary movement by inhibiting postures obtained through dancing and walking in the opposite direction to the one imposed by tropism. The types of exercise performed are the same all through for the two groups. The registration and information form developed in the unit contains the main treatment goals for all phases, as classified by study. Generally, normalization of postural tone and selective mobility training will be applied at first mainly on the trunk and lower limbs, in preparation for gait. Subsequently, the focus is on the integration of the upper limbs in ADL.
Patients in the group category were supervised by a physiotherapist each of whom had prior experience in PD treatment (these professionals didn’t know about patients’ participation in the study). For each patient, home training was based upon both the individual, particular needs and the rehabilitation goals. Patients in the hospital group were treated according to the standard rehabilitation procedure in the neurodegenerative disease Unit by physiotherapists (who didn’t know about the study) in individual training sessions that focused on the patient’s problems. This type of treatment typically ends when the rehabilitation doctor believes that there are no new functional objectives to reach, or when a patient no longer wants to continue.
Data Analysis
The results were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21.0. Descriptive statistics summarize the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of participants, and display them as percentages. T-tests were used to calculate the changes in physical, mental and social health outcomes that occurred after the diagnosed of PD (within-group comparisons of pre- and post-intervention scores, T-test for related samples), and between the two groups (between-group comparisons of change scores in all outcome measures, T-test for independent samples). Parametric statistics were used for the continuous variables extracted by functional tests. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Our analysis of the initial measurement data showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in relation to any of the variables, except age
Frequency of exercise per week: 40.3% of patients were treated two times per week, and the remaining patients were treated 3 times per we. Thus, no statistically significant differences in treatment frequency were found between the group and individual supervised exercise (t = 1.253; p = 0.212).
The treatment goals focused on minimization of the complication of the PD, recovery of the patient’s previous functional capacity, sequelae prevention, and equipping patients with strategies to adapt to their condition, as well as to their immediate environment. We have summarized the functional goals established by the rehabilitation professionals. According to frequency (percentage of times each professional pointed to it as a goal of their treatment in each group). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups, except in the integration of the upper limbs in ADL and psychological stimulation; both had higher percentages in the hospital group.
Functional Objectives for each group and comparison between them
Overall, the results of the questionnaires used in this research show that at the beginning of the study, both groups of patients showed significant ADL dependence, neurological impairment at the levels of consciousness, orientation and language, as well as altered balance and gait. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements from baseline in each of the measures post-intervention.
Inter-group analysis was used to compare improvement in the two groups and the results. Patients in the IE group achieved better scores on the Barthel Index, Canadian Scale, and Tinetti Scale, and had greater improvements from baseline scores on all functionality scales than the GE group. Hence, the results demonstrated that the IE patients were more efficient and more functional than the patients in the GE group after intervention.
Descriptive statistics and significance of treatment effects between groups
Statistically significant differences were found between both groups in terms of the number of physiotherapy sessions given. The IE patients received an average of 22 sessions, in comparison to an average of 24 sessions in the GE group (t = 4.21; p<0.001). Overall, PD patients treated via IE received fewer treatment sessions than those GE group.
The analysis of perceived quality of life, measured by SF-36 in both groups, is presented. Patients from both groups reported similarly as to physical activities, general health, social functioning, and mental health.
Dimensions of SF-36 Health Survey in RITH and Hospital groups
Descriptive statistics and significance of treatment effects between groups
Statistically significant differences were found between both groups in terms of the number of physiotherapy sessions given. The IE patients received an average of 22 sessions, in comparison to an average of 24 sessions in the GE group (t = 4.21; p<0.001). Overall, PD patients treated via IE received fewer treatment sessions than those GE group.
The analysis of perceived quality of life, measured by SF-36 in both groups, is presented. Patients from both groups reported similarly as to physical activities, general health, social functioning, and mental health.
Dimensions of SF-36 Health Survey in RITH and Hospital groups
Descriptive statistics and significance of treatment effects between groups
Statistically significant differences were found between both groups in terms of the number of physiotherapy sessions given. The IE patients received an average of 22 sessions, in comparison to an average of 24 sessions in the GE group (t = 4.21; p<0.001). Overall, PD patients treated via IE received fewer treatment sessions than those GE group.
The analysis of perceived quality of life, measured by SF-36 in both groups, is presented. Patients from both groups reported similarly as to physical activities, general health, social functioning, and mental health.
Dimensions of SF-36 Health Survey in RITH and Hospital groups
Despite a lower average of number of aerobic sessions, patients receiving treatment at individual form of exercises had better recovery and attained the same level of quality of life as the patients receiving group supervised exercises. In addition, IE patients achieved higher scores on functionality scales than patients in the individual group, although it is important to note that differences between the two groups were established in the initial assessments. For example, the patients in IE group, shows more zeal through personal encouragement from the therapist while GE group shows less interest after fews are try to step out of the exercise.
Recent studies have reached the conclusion that early individual supervised aerobic programs after a PD provided significantly better results in terms of physical function, increased quality of life, and reduced depression. One clinical trial compared the changes in perceived health after 5 years of disease between patients who received individual supervised aerobics performed excellently and they concluded that the long-term outcome is more favorable. Our research demonstrates a positive outcome in patients of both groups in all evaluated areas: functionality, neurological scale, balance, and gait. Therefore, both services seem to be effective forms of post-PD aerobics exercises.
This study observed a significant improvement in patients attending aerobics exercises, which was measured by different scales that measured functionality, balance, and gait. The data showed that IE group patients had better results with respect to recovery and had fewer sessions when compared with the GE group patients. Quality of life was severely impaired similarly in both groups, as PD can disable if not properly managed; however, the degree of dependence can be minimized with an early, proper aerobics exercises.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
