Advancing Cancer Immunotherapy: The Promise and Challenges of CAR-NK Cell Therapy

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2766-2314/159

Advancing Cancer Immunotherapy: The Promise and Challenges of CAR-NK Cell Therapy

  • Moumaris M 1

Institute of Science and Technology, Research and Development Company, France.

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Moumaris, Research and Development Company, 14 avenue René Boylesve 75016 Paris, France.

Citation: Moumaris M, (2025), Advancing Cancer Immunotherapy: The Promise and Challenges of CAR-NK Cell Therapy, J, Biotechnology and Bioprocessing, 6(4); DOI:10.31579/2766-2314/159

Copyright: © 2025, Moumaris M. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 05 June 2025 | Accepted: 19 June 2025 | Published: 03 July 2025

Keywords: cancer; chimeric antigen receptor; immunotherapy; nk cells

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapy landscape, particularly with the advent of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapies, which enhance the immune system to target and kill cancer cells. While CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable responses in treating certain hematological cancers, astronomical costs, laborious manufacturing processes, and toxicities restricted its use. 

Introduction

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapy landscape, particularly with the advent of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapies, which enhance the immune system to target and kill cancer cells. While CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable responses in treating certain hematological cancers, astronomical costs, laborious manufacturing processes, and toxicities restricted its use. This immunotherapy opened the door to exploring CAR-NK (Naturel Killer) cells as a promising alternative. These CAR-NK cells combine the intrinsic tumor-killing capabilities of NK cells with the CAR specificity and make cancer therapies safer, less expensive, and more accessible. In this editorial, we describe the present status of CAR-NK cell therapy, including the possible benefits, limitations, and perspectives of this developing area.

CARs promote immune responses and cellular activation by enabling effector cells to target specific antigens. Precision in such a scenario is critical in cancer therapy, with a chance to destroy malignant cells and spare surrounding healthy tissue. Natural Killer (NK) cells contribute to function in the immune system for fighting off tumors by employing a combination of inhibitory and activation receptors, enabling them to detect and destroy malignant or virus-infected cells. Several new strategies in immunotherapy employing NK cells have been developed, with each having its respective strengths and weaknesses (Figure 1) [1]

Figure 1: Activities of Natural killer cells.

One approach is the administration of cytokines, such as IL-2 or IL-15, which indirectly activates NK cells. While IL-2 does enhance NK cell activity, it has associated toxicities that limit its application to combination treatments, whereas IL-15 demonstrates a similar activating capacity with fewer side effects. Another approach is adoptive immunotherapy, which implies the isolation of NK cells, their expansion ex vivo, genetically engineered, and reinfusion into the patient for targeting tumor cells. CAR-NK cells bear chimeric antigen receptors that attack tumor cells, reducing the risk of graft-versus-host disease and offering "off-the-shelf" availability. However, the tumor microenvironment limited their effectiveness [2].

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation is another strategy involving the transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells along with NK and γδT cells from a partially matched donor, which has successfully lowered relapse rates and infections in leukemia patients. Finally, checkpoint inhibitors, which utilize monoclonal antibodies to block immune checkpoints like PD-1 and CTLA-4, can enhance NK cell function, especially against tumors that lack HLA class I molecules, and evade immune detection. Despite these advances, the inhibitory tumor microenvironment remains an obstacle to suppressing NK cell activity. To address this challenge, researchers are investigating combination therapies to disrupt the tumor microenvironment and improve NK cell efficacy to make these treatments more effective and widely accessible (Figure 2) [3].

Figure 2: CAR-NK cell therapy involves a multi-step process : (1) NK cells are extracted from the patient, (2) A gene encoding a chimeric antigen receptor is introduced into these NK cells, granting them the ability to target a specific antigen, (3) The genetically modified NK cells are infused into the patient's body.

CAR T cell therapy has made strides in treating cancer, particularly blood cancers, using a patient's genetically engineered immune cells. However, its application has high costs, the need for a personalized treatment approach, and serious risks such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In response, scientists pay attention to CAR NK cells obtained from donors. This alternative offers a safer, more affordable, and widely accessible "off-the-shelf" treatment option. However, challenges remain in CAR-NK cell therapy. Further research tries constantly to overcome these challenges to maximize the benefits of cancer treatment [4, 5].

Compared with CAR T cells, several advantages of CAR NK cells represent a novelty of cancer immunotherapy and are beginning to come into view: preparation is possible from universal donor sources for immediate "off-the-shelf" availability without personalized cell preparation. Serious side effects like GvHD, cytokine release syndrome, or neurotoxicity are limited, and CAR NK cells are safer for clinical use on an extensive basis. More importantly, CAR NK cells possess an inherent affinity to tumors and persistence efficacy. Nonetheless, tumor microenvironment penetration and persistence of therapeutic effect still have their challenges. Active efforts allow us to overcome these obstacles and improve CAR NK cells for cancer therapy [6, 7].

It also becomes clear that CAR-NK cell therapy could be a very active alternative to CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancy treatment, with possible advantages in safety and costs. Unlike CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells utilize the natural killer cells' inherent antitumor capabilities, reducing the risk of immune-related toxicities and graft-versus-host disease. More importantly, CAR-NK cells can be made as "off-the-shelf" products and would be more accessible tos patients. Despite these advantages and disadvantages, the persistence and proliferation of NK cells in the body remain essential. During ongoing development, CAR-NK therapy holds much promise as an alternative option that is more effective and accessible for cancer treatment [8-10].

From such a concept, CAR-NK cell therapies now represent the next leap in cancer immunotherapy and a much safer, more accessible alternative to CAR-T cell therapies. By harnessing the innate tumor-targeting capabilities of NK cells and overcoming some of the limitations associated with T cell-based therapies, CAR-NK cells change hematological malignancy treatments. While progress in fully realizing the promise of CAR-NK therapy, challenges in improving NK cell persistence and function within the tumor microenvironment still need to be overcome. More research can make it a mainstay in cancer treatment over such hurdles [11-33].

Abbreviations

CAR: Chimeric antigen receptor

CAR-NK cells: Natural Killer cells

CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4

GvHD: Graft-versus-host disease

HLA: Human leukocyte antigen

IL: Interleukine

PD-1: Programmed cell death protein 1

Acknowledgments

The author thinks Prof. Nisen Abuaf (Sorbonne University and AP-HP). The author thinks Tech. Said Youssouf Chanfi (Sorbonne University) and Ing. Jean-Michel Bretagne (AP-HP). The author acknowledges Mrs. Norri Zahra and Mr. Regragui Moumaris. The author thinks Clr. Marie-Hélène Maës and SG. Monique Abi (Research and Development Company). 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova