Adjunctive bone grafting for symptomatic meniscal tearing with concomitant bone marrow edema

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2641-0427/007

Adjunctive bone grafting for symptomatic meniscal tearing with concomitant bone marrow edema

  • Trenton Dalton 1*
  • Cesar Ricardo 2

1* Department of Orthopedics, The Behman Hospital, Egypt.

2 Department of Orthopedics surgery, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding Author: Trenton Dalton, Department of Orthopedics, The Behman Hospital, Egypt.

Citation: Trenton Dalton and Cesar Ricardo (2018), “Adjunctive bone grafting for symptomatic meniscal tearing with concomitant bone marrow edema”, J. Orthopaedics and Surgical Sports Medicine 1(2); Doi: 10.31579/2641-0427/007

Copyright: © 2018 Trenton Dalton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 15 September 2018 | Accepted: 21 September 2018 | Published: 27 September 2018

Keywords: meniscal tear, bone marrow lesion, osteochondritis dissecans, stress fracture, stress reaction, knee instability

Abstract

Meniscal tears are prevalent throughout the population. These tears can become symptomatic for patients including locking, giving way, and buckling, creating instability. Conservative treatment measures initially prior to instability developing may include physical therapy, alternative shots, and rest. Patients may develop bone edema in the proximal tibia following meniscal tearing which may warrant further index treatment measures and a modified physical therapy program when compared to those patients that do not have any bone edema.

Introduction

Meniscal tears are prevalent throughout the population. These tears can become symptomatic for patients including locking, giving way, and buckling, creating instability. Conservative treatment measures initially prior to instability developing may include physical therapy, alternative shots, and rest. Patients may develop bone edema in the proximal tibia following meniscal tearing which may warrant further index treatment measures and a modified physical therapy program when compared to those patients that do not have any bone edema.

Basic Science
With weight bearing, the menisci transfer forces outwards away from the tibia. As menisci tear, the forces may increase across the proximal tibia. As menisci develop complex tears, patients may develop instability as well, creating additional force across the proximal tibia. The proximal tibia may not have the capacity to handle the excess force, develop bone edema, and possibly a stress fracture. Treatment methods include initially non weight bearing with assistive devices, bracing, and physical therapy. When these measures fail and instability develops, additional arthroscopic treatment of the menisci may be beneficial with bone grafting of the proximal tibia.

Materials and Methods

From 2014 to 2016, 42 patients had symptomatic instability with stress reactions and meniscal tearing documented on MRI with no greater than Grade II arthritic changes on plain weight bearing x-rays. Following failed conservative treatment measures, arthroscopic outpatient treatment of the menisci with adjunctive bone grafting with auto graft and 5 cc of Cerament (Bonesupport, Inc) of the proximal tibia took place. Postoperatively the patients were seen 1-2 days following the procedure and their dressing changed. Partial weight bearing was recommended along with physical therapy to start the following week. Patients followed up 2 weeks later, sutures were removed, and x-rays obtained. The patients then followed up monthly with x-rays of the knee to assess bone graft incorporation until their symptoms resolved and were asked to follow up as needed.

Results

Twenty two females and 20 males underwent the procedure. Forty seven procedures were done. Five patients had staged bilateral procedures done. Average age was 53. Average follow up was 14 months. No infections occurred. Preoperative average HSS knee score was 53. Postoperative HSS knee score was 92. (p value of 0.01). The five staged bilateral procedures were done between three to five months after the index operation. All 42 had bone graft incorporated with no nonunions or malunions at the harvest site. None of the 47 procedures developed bone edema postoperatively.

Discussion

Percutaneous subchondroplasty has been described for isolated bone edema lesions in the knee with excellent results. Davis et al showed that subchondroplasty is an effective treatment modality for knee osteoarthritis and bone marrow edema, hopefully delaying the need for a total knee replacement. In patients with meniscal tears and bone edema, our results indicate patients would benefit from adjunctive bone grafting at the edema site with concomitant arthroscopic treatment of the meniscus tears to help the stress reaction and advance physical therapy postoperatively. Cohen et al described that isolated arthroscopic debridement beyond 6 months for bone marrow lesions was not effective but subchondroplasty for osteoarthritis with bone marrow lesions may be a promising approach. Byrd et al showed that midterm outcomes for subchondroplasty 95% would undergo subchondroplasty again and 96% would recommend the procedure. Twenty five percent went on to total knee arthroplasty.

Isolated meniscal tears may not necessarily need adjunctive bone grafting. Yoo et al described no early compromise of a total knee in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty following subchondroplasty.

Conclusion

Adjunctive bone grafting for symptomatic meniscal tearing with concomitant bone marrow edema in the proximal tibia appears to be providing pain relief and improving functional outcomes in short and midterm follow up for patients.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova