Adenocarcinoma of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract After Bariatric Surgery. A Review of the Literature

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/31579/2690-1897/018

Adenocarcinoma of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract After Bariatric Surgery. A Review of the Literature

  • Vladimirov M 1*
  • Hesse U 1
  • Stein H.J. 1

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg Hospital, Germany 

*Corresponding Author: Vladimirov M, Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg Hospital, Germany. E-mail: Vladimirov@uni-tuebingen.de

Citation: Vladimirov M, Hesse U, Stein H.J. (2020) Adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract after bariatric surgery.A review of the literature. Journal of Surgical Case Reports and Images, 3(2): Doi: 10.31579/2690-1897/018

Copyright: © 2020. Vladimirov M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 24 January 2020 | Accepted: 03 February 2020 | Published: 14 February 2020

Keywords: bariatric surgery; gastrointestinal

Abstract

Summary 
Obesity is associated with an increased risk of cancer development in the upper gastrointestinal tract. 
One own case of a female patient with gastric carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy was the reason to review the literature about the frequency and the genesis of gastric carcinoma after bariatric surgery. Additional to our case 3 further patients with gastric carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy and 33 patients with carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract after other bariatric operations are reported in the literature. Due to a lack of registry studies the incidence of gastric cancer after bariatric surgery cannot be calculated.
Early diagnostics should be performed in symptomatic patients and in patients with unspecific symptoms after bariatric surgery to avoid a delay of the diagnosis of potential carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Introduction

The frequency of weight-loss surgeries is increasing. After bariatric procedures postoperative complications and a variety of symptoms may occur.
Malignancies after bariatric surgery are rare, but accurate quantification is not available.
The treatment of a female patient with gastric cancer after sleeve gastrectomy was the reason to review the literature about the incidence and etiology of gastric cancer following bariatric surgery.

Material and methods

The literature search was carried out in PubMed for articles published to July 31, 2016. Key words used were gastric cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, esophageal cancer, esophageal carcinoma, bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty, gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy.
Abstracts were reviewed, relevant articles were obtained and their reference lists were searched to identify further relevant studies.
Results
In addition to one own case 3 further patients with gastric carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy are reported in the literature (Table 1) (1, 2, 3).

Table 1. Case reports of esophagogastric cancer after sleeve gastrectomy

After other bariatric operations additional 33 carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract are described. The majority of the tumors, n = 19, was located in the distal esophagus, at the cardia or within the proximal gastric pouch (Table 2) (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).

Table 2. Case reports of adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract after bariatric operations, n = 33 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
In the 4 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy tumors were diagnosed 4, 9, 24 and 75 months after the bariatric procedures
had been carried out (Table 1). Esophagogastric cancers after the other bariatric operations (n = 33) listed in Table 2 were diagnosed between 2
months and 29 years postoperatively, at a mean of 8.6 years. 

Discussion

Cohort studies have shown a positive association between obesity and the incidence of malignancies of the esophagus, the gallbladder, the breast, the ovaries, the pancreas, the prostate, the colon, the endometrium, the kidney and  leukemia (12). Obesity is involved in 16% (12) of all types of cancer. Obesity and gastric cancer are strongly related, particularly a BMI ≥25 kg/m² (odds ratio = 1.55) (13) was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer of the cardia. One proposed pathway is that increased body weight may increase gastroesophageal reflux which has been associated with adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Obesity in adolescence at an age of 18 with a BMI ≥25.3 kg/m² was associated with a higher risk of gastric cancer (14). Other mechanisms (Table 3) are discussed such as alterations in insulin resistance, increased insulin and IGF levels (insulin-like growth factor), the levels of adiponectin and leptin (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18).

Table 3. Gastric cancer etiology. Pathophysiology and risk factors (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)

BMI = body mass index; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; IGF = insulin-like  growth factor

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment of obesity and related with a significant reduction in incidence of cancer (5), but carcinogenesis cannot be prevented completely. In a retrospective review 3 of 2875 patients (0.1 %) were reported who had undergone bariatric operations and developed adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (19). Due to a lack of registry studies the incidence of gastric cancer after bariatric surgery cannot be calculated.

Pathophysiologic explanations for esophagogastric cancer after restrictive bariatric procedures are chronic gastroesophageal reflux with development of Barrett’s esophagus (20), stasis of food and gastric acid in the gastric pouch causing mucosal irritation (9), increased exposure of the vulnerable lower esophagus to carcinogens unavoidably placed closer to the esophagus within a gastric pouch (11), and local irritation caused by implanted gastric bands (10).

After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass cancer may develop within the gastric pouch as well as in the excluded stomach. The exclusion of the bypassed part of the stomach eliminates its contact with exogenous carcinogens and may be cancer protective. In an experimental rat model Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduced the risk of dietaryinduced gastric cancer (21). On the other hand bile reflux into the excluded stomach is proven, which is discussed to be carcinogenic (22, 23). Also as a potential carcinogen, Helicobacter pylori, even if eradicated before restrictive bariatric surgery, may persist in the bypassed part of the stomach (23).

In the here reported 37 cases of upper gastrointestinal cancers the malignancies were diagnosed at a mean of 95 months (7.9 years) after bariatric surgery, ranging from 2 months to 29 years. In patients not undergoing preoperative endoscopy, time intervals between bariatric surgery and cancer diagnosis were shorter than in patients with preoperative endoscopy. In some patients with reported intervals less than 24 months after surgery it can be speculated, whether the tumors had existed at the time of the bariatric procedures. In these cases routine preoperative endoscopy might have been able to detect the malignancies. Regardless of the possible link between bariatric procedures and subsequent cancer development, we recommend early esophagogastroduodenoscopy in symptomatic patients and in patients with unspecific symptoms after bariatric surgery to avoid a delay in the diagnosis of potential cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova