AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/123
1Institutions: University of Iowa Health Care
2 Institutions: Augusta University
3 Institutions: Cincinnati Good Samaritan Hospital.
4 Institutions: Cincinnati Good Samaritan Hospital.
5 Institutions: Cincinnati Good Samaritan Hospital and Trihealth health system.
*Corresponding Author: Ali Alkhayru, MD Adult Hospitalist Program. Department of Internal Medicine University of Iowa Health Care
Citation: Ali Alkhayru, Adria Madera-Acosta, Bassman Tappuni, Belal Kaseer, Kamal Shemisa (2021) Addressing Stroke Risk in a Patient with CREST Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation with Left Atrial appendage Occluder Device (WATCHMAN). J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(1); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/123
Copyright: © 2021 Ali Alkhayru, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 December 2020 | Accepted: 28 December 2020 | Published: 06 January 2021
Keywords: crest syndrome; atrial fibrillation; watchman device; gastrointestinal hemorrhage
CREST syndrome is rare autoimmune disease causing calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly and telangiectasias. We present a case of an eighty-two year old female with CREST syndrome who presented to our clinic with atrial fibrillation and prohibitive bleeding risk. Managing stroke risk in atrial fibrillation is essential to minimize the morbidity and mortality of the condition. Those with CREST syndrome presenting with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding may require alternatives to anticoagulation. Recently, the left atrial appendage occluder device became widely used to manage patients at increased risk for bleeding. The device provides a safe and efficacious alternative in lowering atrial fibrillation associated stroke risk. Our patient underwent uncomplicated implantation of the left atrial appendage occluder device. She was closely monitored for one year where she remained stroke free and had one minor episode of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Short Title: CREST syndrome and stroke
CREST syndrome is a variant of scleroderma that is characterized by calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly and telangiectasia. Patients with CREST syndrome often suffer from cardiovascular diseases including coronary artery disease, myocardial fibrosis, primary pulmonary hypertension and arterial embolization [1].
Atrial fibrillation raises stroke risk. it is estimated that about 87% of strokes are ischemic in nature and atrial fibrillation is the underlying cause of 15-20 % of cases [2]. Management of this risk usually requires long-term anticoagulation if the CHA2DS2Vasc score is elevated (>2 in men and >3 women) [3]. However, in certain susceptible patient populations, long term anticoagulation can significantly raise the risk for spontaneous hemorrhage [4]. We present a case of a patient with CREST syndrome who suffered from atrial fibrillation and encountered recurrent bleeding due to multiple gastrointestinal telangiectasias.
Case report:
An eighty-two year old female with past medical history of CREST syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and permanent atrial fibrillation presented to the cardiology clinic after hospitalization for atrial fibrillation. She was previously treated with a rhythm control strategy and while on amiodarone, underwent two successive cardioversions. She maintained sinus rhythm for three months after the second cardioversion but presented to the hospital with increasing shortness of breath and melena and was found to have recurrent atrial fibrillation and severe microcytic anemia with a hemoglobin concentration of 6.4 grams/dl.
On evaluation she was hemodynamically stable and in mild respiratory distress. She was transfused three units of packed red blood cells and apixaban was discontinued. The hemoglobin increased appropriately to 9 grams/dl after transfusion. Administration of the apixaban reversal agent, adexanetalfa, was therefore differed. She was evaluated by our gastroenterologists with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and a colonoscopy. The EGD revealed multiple small nonbleeding telangiectasias along the duodenum, cecum and ascending colon. These areas were successfully cauterized, and daily pantoprazole was recommended.
She was not a candidate for anticoagulation during this period. We estimated the stroke risk attributed to atrial fibrillation using the CHA2DS2VASc score which was five estimating a stroke risk of approximately 6.7% in the first year [3]. The HAS-BLED bleeding risk score was seven estimating a bleeding risk is 3.74% in the first year while on anticoagulation. Although resuming anticoagulation would have effectively addressed the stroke risk, she was high risk for recurrent and potentially life-threatening gastro-intestinal hemorrhage. Thus, we considered procedural options in the management of stroke risk associated with atrial fibrillation.
Treatment with the left atrial appendage occlusion device shortens the duration for anticoagulation to 45 days and thus minimizes the risk for bleeding. Because of recurrent bleeding, elevated stroke risk and risk of rebleeding, she was considered a suitable candidate for the left atrial appendage occluder device, (WATCHMAN device). A transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated a left atrial appendage with “windsock” morphology, anatomically suitable for left atrial appendage closure. The right ventricular systolic pressure was 30 mmHg. She underwent successful deployment of the WATCHMAN device using standard technique (Figure 1, and Figure 2).
She was then anticoagulated with warfarin for 45 days following the device placement and did not suffer gastrointestinal hemorrhage during that period [5]. She was followed for one year where she remained stroke free and had one minor episode of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Systemic sclerosis is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with varying severity. The condition falls into two major categories; diffuse or localized scleroderma. The localized version is known as CREST Syndrome and has a fourfold higher prevalence among women compared to male counterparts [6]. Bleeding telangiectasias can cause severe gastrointestinal bleeding which have high mortality rate, up to 22% in some series. Women were 2.7 times more likely to have gastrointestinal bleeding due to telangiectasias [7]. Iron deficiency anemia due to severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is common. Hence, Proper endoscopic evaluation is needed in patients with CREST syndrome who present with microcytic anemia. Recurrent bleeding from mucosal telangiectasia is possible [8].
Atrial fibrillation is widely encountered in medical practice. Its most feared consequence is stroke resulting in permanent neurologic sequelae [3]. The main scoring system used to predict thromboembolic stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation is CHA2DS2VASc score, a comprehensive scoring system using clinical variables to identify those at risk [1]. Patients with a CHA2DS2VASc score of 2 or higher require anticoagulation. Bleeding risk with anticoagulation can be estimated using the HAS-BLED bleeding score that incorporates known clinical risk factors that raise bleeding risk [10]. Anti-coagulation raises both the risk of intracranial bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding [4]. Gastrointestinal bleeding is more common and is not an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation. Risk of recurrence and individual patient factors need to be carefully considered prior to resuming anticoagulation. Those with gastrointestinal telangiectasias are at higher risk for recurrent bleeding [11,12].
In our patient, we considered strategies to occlude the left atrial appendage and therefore reduce the duration of treatment with anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN Device is a minimally invasive procedure that can occlude the left atrial appendage. The device was non-inferior to warfarin as a strategy to lower stroke risk (2.3 events per 100 patient-years with WATCHMAN compared to 3.8 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin (rate ratio, 0.60; 95% credible interval, 0.41-1.05, noninferior margin rate ratio of < 2). The estimated relative risk reduction for stroke was as low as 1.1 in those with high CHA2DS2VASc score. The Watchman device has a high success rate of about 95% in sealing the left atrial appendage and shortens the period of anticoagulation to 45 days [13].
The parachute shaped implantable nitinol device is encased within a trans-septal access sheath and delivery catheter. After successful trans-septal puncture of the atrial septum, introduction of the WATCHMAN access system is followed by isolation of left atrial appendage with a pigtail catheter to allow for safe advancement of the WATCHMAN delivery system and finally deployment of the device.
When performing trans-septal puncture of the atrial septum, there should be careful consideration of patients at risk for pulmonary hypertension such as our patient. Pulmonary hypertension can occur in as many as 35% of patients with CREST syndrome. If untreated, transseptal puncture can lead to right to left shunting patients and cyanosis in such patients. Therefore, patients with CREST affected by pulmonary hypertension who undergo the procedure should be treated with an atrial septal occlude device (Amplatzer) in order to avoid such complications [14].
Conclusion:
WATCHMAN device has proven safety and efficacy and maybe the more appropriate option for stroke prevention in patients with Atrial fibrillation and Crest Syndrome who are at higher risk of bleeding from gastrointestinal telangiectasias.
Teaching points:
Disclosures:
Kamal Shemisa, MD, FACP, FACC: Speakers Bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Espiron, and Zoll Cardiac Devices.
Other Authors: Nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements: None
List of Support/Grant Information: None
Statement of contribution: All authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Word count: 1500 (Excluding Abstract).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
