AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/191
Nurse of the Hemodynamics Service of the Miguel Servet University Hospital of Zaragoza, Spain.
*Corresponding Author: Virginia Abadia Piquero, Nurse of the Hemodynamics Service of the Miguel Servet University Hospital of Zaragoza, Spain.
Citation: Susana B. Medina, Consuelo A. Alfageme, Lorena C. Toral, Virginia A. Piquero, (2023), Adaptation of the Healthcare Team as the Key to Tavi Implantation, Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 7(6); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/191
Copyright: © 2023, Virginia Abadia Piquero. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 11 September 2023 | Accepted: 18 October 2023 | Published: 01 December 2023
Keywords: syncope ; gradient; tavi, severe aortic stenosis
We present the case of a 79 year old female patient with a history of ischemic heart disease revascularized with stents, and severe aortic stenosis, recently included in the surgical waiting list for treatment. She consulted for syncope and humerus fracture, preceded by chest pain with electrocardiographic changes. During the sequence of diagnostic tests indicated in this context, she suffered a severe clinical worsening, complicating to the point of acute pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock and requiring mechanical ventilation.
The underlying cause was severe aortic stenosis and, therefore, the ideal treatment was urgent percutaneous aortic valve implantation, as the patient had a peak peak gradient of 64 mmHg.
The resolution of the case was not simple, since it required the transfer of a hemodynamically unstable patient from her hospital to the center specialized in TAVI implantation, located only 2 km away.
The novel and exceptional aspect was the adaptation of the usual treatment strategy (transfer of the patient to the referral center and scheduled implantation) to a patient-centered strategy, which required the transfer of the TAVI expert team (nurses and physicians) together with the implantation kit to the hospital where the patient was admitted.
- Aortic stenosis is one of the most common heart valve diseases, occurring most frequently in people over 75 years of age. When the aortic valve area is ≤ 1 cm2, it is considered serious and has a poor prognosis when the patient presents symptoms. Currently, there are no medical therapies to prevent or delay the progression of the disease. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) turns out to be an alternative to SVAo for symptomatic patients with high or intermediate surgical risk. Valve replacement has been proposed as the definitive treatment even for patients with severe non-symptomatic AS. [1,2]
- A large percentage of patients with severe aortic stenosis have coronary artery disease, due, in part, to the similar pathogenesis of both. Angina is a common symptom in cases with severe aortic stenosis. The patient's cardiovascular risk profile will determine the severity of coronary heart disease, the greater the number of risk factors. To reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in patients with severe and complex coronary artery disease who undergo TAVI, it is ideal to resolve both aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. [3]
- Cardiogenic shock is known as the primary cardiac disorder characterized by a state of low cardiac output and circulatory failure that triggers hypoperfusion of target organs and tissue hypoxia. Acute myocardial infarction is the most common cause of cardiogenic shock. There are other disorders that cause deterioration of the myocardium such as: the valves, the pericardium or the conduction system. Morbidity and mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock remain high despite advances in mechanical circulatory support treatments. [4]
Clinical observation:
The case of a patient, a 79-year-old woman, who went to the hospital's emergency department on 7/27/2021 due to chest pain radiating to the left upper extremity, dyspnea and syncope, which led to a head fracture, is presented. of the left humerus.
The physical examination revealed: BP: 62/31, HR: 78 pm, Oxygen Saturation: 95% with a face mask with reservoir, poor general condition, diaphoresis and lip cyanosis.
Diagnostic impression of ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (STEACS)/cardiogenic shock.
Infarction Code is activated through 061 for transfer to the hospital with a hemodynamics unit.
Clinical history of: pulmonary hypertension, dyslipidemia, hypothyroidism, chronic ischemic heart disease with percutaneous revascularization (stents in the middle and distal LAD, distal CD with proximal PD, PTCA on OCT of the ostial CX, moderate lesion at the level of the distal LCT), degenerative aortic valve disease with severe stenosis and hyperuricemia.
*ECG: ST segment elevation in V1-V3 and AvR and generalized ST segment depression suggestive of ischemia in the context of critical AS . (Figure 1 and 2)
*RX: Cardiomegaly. Signs of heart failure.
*Blood analysis: Ultrasensitive Troponin (TnT us) from 220 to 4000 and D-Dimer of 15000.
*Echocardioscopy: hypertrophic left ventricle with mildly-moderately depressed LVEF (40%). Severe aortic stenosis, moderate mitral regurgitation.
Figure 1Figure 2
*Coronary angiography: Upon arrival at the Hemodynamics unit, a diagnostic study is performed through the right radial artery. in which TIMI 3 flow was observed throughout the coronary tree with no obstructive lesions in the coronary arteries. Good late results of Everolimus-eluting stents previously implanted in the mid LAD, distal LAD and ostial LAD. Good result of PTCA on OCT of ostial CX with moderate caliber distal bed. Moderate injury at the distal CT level (assessed by IVUS). (Figure 3 and 4)
Figure 3Figure 4: Given the result of the coronary angiography and the presence of D-Dimer of 15,000, it is important to rule out PE using pulmonary CT angiography, the conclusion of which was:
*Pulmonary CT angiography: No signs of PE. Signs of HTP. Signs of hemodynamic decompensation with probable perihilar cardiogenic edema, bilateral pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. (Figure 5 and 6)
Figure 5 Figure 6: After going to the cardiology ward, the patient worsens with acute lung edema, with symptoms of sudden onset of dyspnea, tachypnea, tachycardia of 120 bpm, sweating, bilateral crackles up to the middle fields and significant respiratory work, which is resolved with pharmacological treatment of Furosemide 40 mg, Morphic Chloride 3.3 mg and O2 in reservoir.
The next day and in the morning shift he presented hemodynamic stability but with a tendency towards arterial hypotension, O2 saturation 98% with reservoir and a diuresis of 400cc.
The case is discussed with the referral hospital to schedule the TAVI implant in the next 24 hours.
In the afternoon shift, hypotension and onset of oliguria persist despite diuretic treatment. Dopamine perfusion pump is started at a dose of 0.5 mcgr/kg/min. O2 saturation of 92%, nervous state, but without dyspnea or pain.
Finally, he was transferred to the ICU due to worsening general condition with oliguria, anginal chest pain, profuse sweating, tachypnea, hypotension of 65/38 mmHg, HR 100 bpm; where orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are carried out.
Relatives are notified given the patient's serious condition and poor prognosis.
Given the sudden development of the symptoms, and after once again ruling out coronary artery disease, the implantation of TAVI was prioritized as the treatment of choice.
Due to the patient's poor condition, her transfer to the hospital specialized in the technique was ruled out. Therefore, it was decided to move the health team of hemodynamicists, anesthetist, scrub nurse, nurse expert in valve assembly, and the necessary material for the implant.
Communication between the units responsible for the patient, ICU and hemodynamics was continuous, since it varied as the patient's condition worsened. Therefore, the information that reached the hemodynamics unit specialized in the implant was disparate, going from having the procedure scheduled for the day after the notification, to having to do it immediately
on the same day, until ending with the transfer of the personnel and material to the hospital where the patient was.
Likewise, the nursing team from both centers coordinated the preparation of the necessary material for the successful implant.
The transfer approach was uncertain, since no means of transportation was available for this situation. Making the decision to do it in several taxis, with the drawback that the valve kit did not fit in any vehicle.
Finally, and carrying the voluminous box of the valve kit, we arrived at the unit where the implant would proceed. There the health team was waiting for us with great expectation with everything prepared.
The first intention was to perform a palliative aortic valvuloplasty, but after measuring gradients and assessing the patient's situation, the decision was made to permanently implement TAVI.
Patient included in the surgical demand list for TAVI implantation since 07/22/2021.
In the previous study it seemed that the origin of the left main artery could be compromised by the TAVI stent, so it was decided to perform protection of the left coronary artery with a 3.5 (6F) EBU catheter, Asahi Sion angioplasty guide and NC balloon. angioplasty through the right brachial artery.
Therapeutic percutaneous access through the right femoral artery, successful implantation of the Sapien 3 valve, no. 26 (Edwards). (Figure 7 and 8)
Managing to go from an initial gradient of 64 mmHg to 0 mmHg, without regurgitation. The hemodynamic improvement was evident from the first moment. (Figure 9 and 10)
Figure 7 Figure 8
Figure 9 Figure 10
The care plan was made from an assessment framework based on the Virginia Henderson model and NANDA, NIC, NOC Taxonomy. (5)
| NURSING DIAGNOSES | RELATED FACTORS | NOC | NIC | ACTIVITIES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk of body temperature imbalance 00005 | Sedative drugs and low operating room temperature | Thermoregulation 000800 | Temperature regulation: intraoperative 3902 | • Check the ambient temperature • Prepare and regulate the corresponding heating devices. • Heat or cool all irrigation solutions, iv . and skin preparation • Cover the patient with reflective blankets |
| Risk of Infection 00004 | invasive procedures | Knowledge: infection control 1842
Immune status 0702 | Infection control: intraoperative 6545 | • Limit and control the entry and exit of people in the operating room. • Ensure that surgical staff wear appropriate equipment • Verify the antibiotic prophylaxis administered • Apply antiseptic as prescribed • Wash hands before and after each patient care activity. • Open sterile supplies and instruments using aseptic techniques • Check sterilization indicators • Brushing hands and nails, gowns and gloves, according to center standards • Inspect the skin/tissues around the surgical site • Keep the room clean and disinfected |
Risk of bleeding 0206 | Interventionism Use of anticoagulant medication | Risk control 4160 | Prevention of bleeding 4010 | • Perform coagulation studies • Monitor the patient closely • Observe signs and symptoms |
| Risk of urinary retention 00023 | Volume Management
Immobility on the stretcher | Urinary elimination 0508 | Bladder catheterization 0580 Urinary catheter care 1876 | •Do the probing in a sterile manner •Management of the catheter with asepsis •Check the correct placement of the balloon |
| Fluid volume deficit 00027 | Active fluid volume loss | Water balance 0601 | Liquid Handling 4120 | •Monitor hydration status (moist mucous membranes, adequate pulse and blood pressure) • Monitor blood pressure, frequency cardiac and respiratory status •Administer IV fluids at room temperature |
| Ineffective breathing pattern 00032 | hypoventilation syndrome, anxiety, decreased energy, and respiratory muscle fatigue | Respiratory status: airway patency 0410
Respiratory status: ventilation 0403
Vital signs status 0802
| Airway Management 3140
Ventilation aid 3390
Vital Signs Monitoring 6680
Respiratory monitoring 3350
Airway aspiration 3270
| • Assess the state of consciousness of the patient • Assess the color of the skin and filling capillary • Assess the respiratory dynamics and expansion thoracic • Place in position semifowler • Assess the Need to administration of ventilation mechanics • Participate in the intubation orotracheal
|
* Likert scale: 1: Severely compromised; 2: Substantially compromised; 3: Moderately engaged; 4: Slight deviation from the normal range; 5: Normal
Severe aortic stenosis can present with symptoms of angina along with ST segment elevation on the ECG which, as in our case, required certain diagnostic tests to be performed that made our patient's condition worse.
Severe aortic stenosis requires immediate treatment when symptoms (syncope, angina, and heart failure) occur. Otherwise, the evolution of the clinic leads to cardiogenic shock, multiple organ failure and, therefore, death.
We have to emphasize the importance of the work carried out by the multidisciplinary team involved in the care and treatment of the patient. It is essential for making correct decisions and in our case the intervention of TAVI implantation in an emergent manner was the key to success.
Clearly, the nursing team has a fundamental role in the management of this type of patient who is so unstable and, at the same time, so fragile. It must be specialized in very versatile techniques, of great precision and in continuous updating. Giving special importance to the role of the expert nurse in the assembly of the TAVI, it is essential that she have correct training to assume such responsibility, since without her the implantation of the valve prosthesis could not have been carried out and, therefore, we would be facing a fatal outcome.
The nurse will ensure the well-being of the patient at all times, attending to the vital needs intrinsic to this type of surgery and will work together with the rest of the professionals to ensure that the procedure is successful.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
