AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/050
Interventional Nephrology Unit, Nephrology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
*Corresponding Author: Iyad Abuward Abu-sharkh, Interventional Nephrology Unit, Nephrology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Citation: Iyad Abuward Abu-sharkh, Nisrine Arhda, Suleyka Puello Martinez, Marta Pais Seijas, Rafael Alonso Valente, Candido Diaz Rodriguez (2020) Aberrant Termination Of The Thoracic Duct, Structure To Be Considered In Interventional Nephrology For Vascular Access. J Clinical Research and Reports, 3(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/050
Copyright: © 2020 Iyad Abuward Abu-sharkh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 February 2020 | Accepted: 18 February 2020 | Published: 26 February 2020
Keywords: hemodialysis; tunneled catheter; thoracic duct
Background: The placement of the central vascular accesses for hemodialysis is a very frequent activity in the daily work of nephrologists, and the success of renal replacement therapy in both chronic and acute patients depends on it. That is why it is important to know the complications due to these interventional procedures. In this article we discuss the case of a possible anatomical variant of a structure that is mentioned very little in the clinical practice of interventional nephrology; the thoracic duct.
Conclusion: The knowledge of anatomy and possible anatomical variants, the use of minimally invasive instruments and good training are considered essential to avoid major complications during vascular interventions.
Vascular access for hemodialysis is considered a main pillar in renal replacement therapy, since a good functioning of the vascular access guarantees better treatment quality.
The use of central venous catheters for hemodialysis patients has progressively increased in recent years; however indications for their use should be limited due to the greater associated complications, both thrombotic and infectious. This is due to the variation in the characteristics of the patients, who are older and with a higher percentage of diabetics.
However, it remains an essential vascular access for the nephrologist due to the possibility of immediate use after placement, in addition to the increase in the number of patients without the possibility of creating arteriovenous fistula [1].
Central venous catheters are classified as non-tunneled (for use less than 3 weeks) and tunneled (when their use for more than 4 weeks).
The right tunneled or permanent catheter is the first choice between percutaneous vascular access, and the right jugular vein is the first option in case of no contraindications, because it is straight and there is less chance of thoracic duct injuries. Several studies concluded that cannulation of the left internal jugular was associated with a higher incidence of failures and complications. There is clear evidence that supports the use of ultrasound during the cannulation of central vessels to reduce the complications arising from puncture, in addition to the search for branches or anatomical variants. Vascular mapping prior to procedures and the study of neighboring structures of large vessels with ultrasound is important, since it allows the detection of morphological and anatomical abnormalities, especially in the cannulation of the left jugular vein [2].
A 63-year-old male patient, height 176 cm, weight 89 kg, begins hemodialysis through a temporary femoral catheter 10 days before, comes for placement of a right tunneled catheter while waiting for arteriovenous fistula creation. His past medical history is: chronic kidney disease due to diabetic nephropathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus for 15 years, controlled arterial hypertension with two drugs, hyperlipidemia, goiter without thyroid dysfunction, and surgical history of ankle fracture in a traffic accident.
His chest X-ray is normal, and abdominal ultrasound shows no abnormality. His blood test shows a normal coagulation study, Urea 120 mg dl, Creatinine 6 mg/dl, Hemoglobin 12.3 g / dl, K 4.7 mmol, Na 141 mmol, CL 101 mmol, Ca 9.2 mg / dl.
The patient is prepared in the interventional nephrology unit for ultrasound guided placement of 28 cm tunneled catheter, 15.5 F, in the right jugular vein. A Micropuncture Access Set 4.5 F was used for ultrasound control puncture of the vein through posterior approach.
The puncture was unique and direct with successful channulation of the right jugular vein and the introduction of the micro guide wire was without incident.
After the introduction of the guide wire and the first dilator, the exit of white creamy liquid mixed with the blood has been observed, Lymph leak was suspected, an urgent blood sample obtained from the puncture is sent to the laboratory that shows triglyceride level of 996mg/dl while in peripheral blood it was 162 mg /dl.
After confirming the correct position of the guide wire by fluoroscopy, the insertion process has been completed without further incident.
No complications were observed on the chest X-ray during the next few days. No other complications were detected in the area of the wound or in the neck.
Early complications arising from the placement of percutaneous vascular accesses occur immediately upon placement or in the first hours. They are usually uncommon and are related to venous puncture, for example: arterial puncture, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pericardial tamponade, retroperitoneal hematoma, air embolism, cardiac arrhythmias, laryngeal recurrent nerve paralysis, reactions to local anesthesia, vasovagal reactions, etc [3, 4].
The most frequent late complications are venous stenosis that occurs more frequently in the subclavian vein than in the jugular. Thrombosis, which could be total or partial, and also is classified as extrinsic and intrinsic; extrinsic are secondary to the formation of a wall thrombus, attached to the tip of the catheter, in the superior vena cava or right atrium, while in the intrinsic the thrombus is located intraluminally, at the tip of the catheter or forming pericatheter fibrin sheath [5].
Another structure that we must take into account is the thoracic duct; the thoracic duct has a normal caliber of approximately 2 to 4 mm and carries between 2 ml and 10 ml of lymph per hour. It is usually born in the abdomen and continues in a middle course through the posterior mediastinum, located in front of the thoracic vertebra bodies between the thoracic aorta on the left and the azygos vein on the right. It goes up the upper mediastinum, gradually deviates to the left, penetrates the neck and describes an upward convex curve leading to the left jugular-subclavian junction, either in the internal jugular vein, in the subclavian or in the brachiocephalic [6].
Thoracic duct lesions are more frequent in cannulation of the left jugular vein, since that most cases, the duct ends on the left side, but there are also variations in its terminations. In some studies on cadavers, multiple variants have been demonstrated in the path and termination of the thoracic duct, most of the cases the thoracic duct ends on the left side in the internal jugular vein, the subclavian vein or the angle between the two, but termination has also been observed in the external jugular vein, the vertebral vein, the brachiocephalic vein, the suprascapular vein and the transverse cervical vein [7,8]. In addition, and although with a very low incidence, a variant of the thoracic duct has been observed with termination in the right internal jugular vein [9]. According to Van Pernis, in a study of 1,081 cadavers he found the right variation in 61 (5.6%) [10] And Kausel reports an incidence of 2% [11].
In our case, as there were no complications and the subsequent controls; Chest x-ray; at 1 day, 2 days and one week, have not shown lymph leak, the patient has not been studied with lymphogram to demonstrate the presence of a right thoracic duct and otherwise the lymph leak could have its origin in the right lymphatic duct. In any case, we believe that if damage to the thoracic duct has occurred would be minimal thanks to the use of the micropuncture introducer needle.
The complications of cannulation of vascular accesses are relatively frequent and vary from mild to very serious. In the field of interventional nephrology, vascular access is a fundamental pillar in daily practice, since the success of renal replacement therapy depends on it, which is why prior exploration and ultrasound mapping allows reducing the incidents that can be found during Interventional procedures. However, interventional nephrologists should know the anatomy of the region and the possible anatomical variants that they can find and also be able to diagnose and treat complications. In addition, we cannot ignore the importance of using minimally invasive needles such as the 21G needle instead of 18 G needles.
Conflict of Interest Statement
We have no financial, consultant, institutional, and other relationships that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
