AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/148
1Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
2Department of Psychology, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
3,5,6Department of Parasitology and Entomology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
4Department of Psychology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.
7Faculty of Education, Southwest University, China
*Corresponding Author: Emmanuel So Chukwuma Ezaki, Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Citation: Emmanuel S. Ezaka, Joshua O. Nwangbo, Ephraim I. Ezaka, Theodora O. Nwodo, Chidera G. Obi., et al, (2024), A Study on Influence of Psychological Distress and Job Satisfaction on Psychological Wellbeing Among Nurses, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 7(4); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/148
Copyright: © 2024, Emmanuel So Chukwuma Ezaki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 February 2024 | Accepted: 05 March 2024 | Published: 18 March 2024
Keywords: distress; job satisfaction; nurses; psychological well-being; well-being
Evidences have shown negative relationships between psychological distress and psychological well-being, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being among nurses; however, to the best of our knowledge, no study before now has investigated the interaction of these variables (psychological distress and job satisfaction) on the psychological well-being of nurses. In addition, the present study examined how psychological distress and job satisfaction influence the psychological well-being of nurses. The pool of participants consisted of one hundred and twenty (120) nurses in the Federal Teaching Hospital, Beaklike, Nigeria. Their ages ranged from 24 to 51 years, M=34.00; SD=08.30, and the data collection lasted from May to June 2023. The participants completed several self-report questionnaires, such as the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), the Minnesota Satisfaction questionnaire, and the Psychological Well-being Scale (PWS). The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that psychological distress significantly influenced psychological well-being among nurses, and job satisfaction also significantly influenced psychological well-being among nurses, while no significant interaction influence was recorded on the impact of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses. We concluded that the working conditions of nurses should be reviewed to ascertain these psychosocial factors that elicit psychological distress and job dissatisfaction. This will improve nurses’ mental well-being and quality of patient care.
The investigation of psychological distress in the nursing field has evolved over several decades now. While some researchers found psychological distress to be a prognosticator of psychosomatic function and poor quality of life, others found that its presence triggers a risk of heart disease and poor immunity. 1, 2 In 2016, about 543 million people were found to experience psychological distress due to depression and anxiety.3 Psychological distress indicates an “undifferentiated group of symptoms ranging from anxiety and depressive symptoms to functional impairment, personality traits (confusing and troubling), and behavioural problems”. 4 It is a common occurrence among nurses, as it is perceived as a temporary or episodic manifestation of unwanted psychological experiences in the form of specific stressors, such as disturbed sleep, constipation, chronic pain, excessive tiredness, memory loss, decreased sexual drive, and can be handled either by adopting or eliminating the stressor. 5 Substantial studies have shown that psychological distress among nurses is on the increase since nurses are constantly faced with providing healthcare for chronically ill patients, which is emotionally draining, therefore exposing them to poor sleep patterns, and a lack of support, which affects their overall well-being, family life, social relationships, resulting in work absences, and a low quality of general health services. 2, 6, 7Approximately 70% of nurses undergo distressing experiences such as tension, anxiety, depression, sadness in social life and the workplace, and when compared to the general populace, there is a high frequency of mental health disorders among healthcare workers as they are prone to depression and stress. 8, 9 Since previous studies have established that psychological distress impacts negatively on the lives of nurses and in turn affects patients’ quality of care, this may also influence whether or not nurses are satisfied with their jobs. Job satisfaction among nurses plays a vital role in patients' care. Job satisfaction refers to the extent to which job conditions meet an individual's needs; the higher the balance of satisfaction over dissatisfaction, the greater the likelihood of the employee playing vital role in achieving organizational goals. 10 It goes beyond the subjective nature of the job to collective working conditions such as working hours, salaries and other remunerations, living conditions, level of occupational hazards, etc. It has been identified that different factors such as positive interpersonal relationships (loyalty, sharing of common values, trust), and quality of care correlate with job satisfaction, as when nurses identify patient care to be crucial in their work, job satisfaction improves. 11 Also, balanced workload, reward for effort, and well-thought-out roles and responsibilities are factors associated with higher levels of job satisfaction, while dissatisfaction with the quality of work, attending to a larger number of patients, inadequate work empowerment, and poor leadership are associated with burnout and poor job satisfaction among nurses. 12, 14 When workers enjoy their working conditions, it improves their mental well-being, thereby increasing job productivity. Psychological well-being postulates a state in which an individual becomes productive due to self-acceptance, having life goals, relating properly with others, being independent, having control over the environment, and personal growth. 15 It captures individuals’ perceptions of the quality of their mental health, where they are resourceful, can manage daily stressors, and are productive both to themselves and to society at large. Previous empirical studies suggest different factors that influence psychological well-being, including coping strategies, individual characteristics, self-concept, social support, stigma, religiosity factors, personality, psychological stress, quality of life, and self-efficacy. 15,16 Among these factors, social support, coping strategies, psychological stress, and religiosity have been found to directly influence an individual’s psychological well-being. 17
Among nurses, studies have shown that different factors influence their levels of psychological well-being, such as work-family interference and emotional demands that induce greater anxiety and depression, thereby lowering their mental well-being. Another study found that work overload, lack of career development, and lack of recognition were positively related to low well-being and burnout among healthcare professionals. 18 A more recent study that examined psychological well-being among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic indicated that psychological well-being increased with working experience, as nurses with fewer years in service indicated poor mental well-being compared to nurses with more working years. The study also found that pandemics or other health emergencies can induce psychological distress among health workers, but those with a high level of mental well-being were able to cope with the distress and commitment to duties. 17 The above outcomes indicate that psychological well-being is a positive psychosocial tool that should be utilized in improving quality of life and quality of patient care among healthcare professionals, but the extent to which these factors such as psychological distress and job satisfaction influence psychological well-being is yet unknown.
The present study
Evidences have shown negative relationships between psychological distress and psychological well-being, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being among nurses; however, to the best of our knowledge, no study before now has investigated the interaction of these variables (psychological distress and job satisfaction) on the psychological well-being of nurses. In addition, the present study aims to examine how psychological distress and job satisfaction influence the psychological well-being of nurses. We hypothesized that (1) psychological distress will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses, (2) job satisfaction will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses, and (3) the interaction of psychological distress and job satisfaction will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses.
Participants
The total number of participants in this study consisted of 120 nurses at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Beaklike, Nigeria. Participants’ eligibility included: (a) must be a nurse; (b) must be 18 years of age and older; (c) must be physically fit; and (d) must consent to willingly participate in the study. The results show that the age mean of the participants was 34.00years (SD=08.30, ranging from 24 to 51 years). Among the participants, 34 (28.3%) were males, 86 (71.7%) were females, 41% were married, and 59% were single.
Instruments
Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), developed by Kessler (2003). The instrument is a 10-item Likert format numbered 1-5, intended to yield a global measure of psychological distress based on questions about anxiety and depressive symptoms. The scale is positively scored from 10 to 50, low (10, 15), moderate (16, 21) and high (22, 50). This instrument has a reliability of .87 and a Cronbach alpha coefficient of .92, while in the present study we obtained an alpha coefficient of .77. Job satisfaction was measured using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Weis (1967). The instrument measures individuals' levels of job satisfaction such as intrinsic satisfaction, extrinsic satisfaction, and general satisfaction of employees. The 20-item instrument is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied), with the higher score indicating a great deal of satisfaction. The instrument has demonstrated a Cronbach alpha coefficient of .88 and a reliability coefficient of .93.
Psychological Well-being was measured using the Psychological Well-being Scale (PWS), as developed by Ryff, (1995). The instrument consists of a 42-item Likert-type response representing six domains of psychological well-being namely: Autonomy (items: 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37); Environmental Mastery (items: 2, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, 38); Personal Growth (items: 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39); Positive Relations (4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40); Purpose in Life (items: 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35, 41); and Self-acceptance (items: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42). Items 3, 5, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 39, and 41 were indirectly scored. In terms of scoring, scores for each domain are summed up, and a higher score indicates a great deal of the domain. This instrument has a reliability of .94 and a Cronbach alpha coefficient of .77.
Procedure
The researchers approached the nurses of the tertiary healthcare institution during one of their clinical meetings and explained themselves and the purpose of the study. The participants were given the right to accept or decline participation in the study. Those who consented were handed the instruments and were further instructed to submit the forms to the Matrons of their units when done. The researchers visited each unit weekly to collect the forms, and only well-filled forms were scored and served as data in the present study. The data collection lasted for 2 months (May-June 2023).
Ethical Consideration
The researchers obtained ethical clearance from the institution’s research ethics committee. (Ethics clearance number: AEFUTHA/45/04-19-2023).
We employed descriptive statistics to ascertain whether the demographic variables, e.g., gender, age, and marital status, were correlated with the major variables. Also, in order to examine whether (a) psychological distress will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses, (b) job satisfaction will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses, and (c) the interaction of psychological distress and job satisfaction will significantly influence psychological well-being among nurses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistics were employed.
Table 1: Data Summary Table
Table 1 explains that participants with low levels of psychological distress had 53.0% of the total scores while those with moderate and high levels of psychological distress had 21.9% and 24.4% respectively. Participants with
low levels of job satisfaction reported 61.9% of the total scores while 38.1% had high levels of job satisfaction. Lastly, participants with low levels of psychological wellbeing had 8.9%, while those with high levels of psychological wellbeing had 91.1%.
According to the Table2, psychological distress had a statistically significant influence on psychological wellbeing, (F=25.82, df=111, p<.01). This significant influence indicates that the nurses’ dominant low levels of psychological distress were influential on their states of psychological wellbeing. The result of table 2 above implies that job satisfaction had a statistically significant influence on psychological wellbeing (f=19.12, df=111, p.01). This implies that nurses’ dominant low levels of job satisfaction were influential on their states of psychological wellbeing. Finally, according the Table2, there was no statistically significant interaction influence of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological wellbeing (f=0.76, df=111, p<.01). This indicates that the influence of the levels of job satisfaction on psychological wellbeing among Nurses did not vary according to the levels of psychological distress and vise-versa.
The present study examined the influence of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses. The results showed that psychological distress significantly influenced psychological well-being among nurses. Hence, the hypothesis which stated that there will be a statistically significant influence of psychological distress on psychological well-being among nurses was supported. It further indicates that the presence of psychological distress negatively influences an individual’s mental well-being, especially for people who perform stressful jobs like nurses. This outcome supports the findings of other studies where its existence is linked to disturbed sleep, decreased sexual drive, low quality of life, mental health disorders, depression, and stress among nurses. 2, 5, 9 Exposure to risky working conditions such as taking care of chronically ill patients, patients with communicable diseases, or patients with conditions that can be contracted by the nurses through sharp objects used on patients can induce mental stress, which in turn affects their psychological well-being. Nurses who take care of patients who hardly survive their conditions, such as cancer, or patients with relapsing conditions like Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorder (SUD), are likely to suffer burnout, stress, and mental fatigue, which is likely to affect their mental well-being. Thus, a constant review of the working conditions of nurses by providing them with training and retraining on the best global standards for handling patients with chronic illness or relapsing conditions, and making available trained psychologists
to work directly with them will help in eliminating psychological distress among nurses. Job satisfaction positively influenced psychological well-being among nurses. This indicates that being satisfied with work helps nurses develop good psychological well-being. Hence, the hypothesis which
stated that there will be a statistically significant influence of job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses was supported. This result supports the findings of other studies where the presence of job satisfaction induced good psychological well-being among nurses. 19 Job dissatisfaction among nurses has been linked to burnout, emotional exhaustion, low personal accomplishment, and personalization, which induced poor psychological well-being. 20 Several studies have reported the existence of job satisfaction among nurses across the United States of America, the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Nigeria. 21, 24 When job conditions meet employees' needs, it is likely to boost such employees' mental well-being thereby increasing productivity and zeal to meet the organization’s goals. Job satisfaction is no doubt an integral part of every organization, especially those in the health sector. When nurses are satisfied with their working conditions and their mental health improves, they value their lives and that of their patients. Hence, health facilities are expected to incorporate friendly working conditions for nurses, conditions that will enable them to achieve their personal goals, grow, and be satisfied with work. No significant interaction influence was recorded on the impact of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses. This shows that the interaction between psychological distress and job satisfaction does not affect the psychological well-being of nurses. Hence, the hypothesis which stated that there will be a statistically significant interaction influence on psychological well-being among nurses was not supported. Being the first study to explore the interaction between psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses, psychological distress alone has a negative interaction with psychological well-being thereby affecting their ability to be productive at work, achieve their personal goals, or achieve organizational goals. On the other hand, the presence of job satisfaction among nurses goes a long way to boost their productive level, thereby elevating their mental well-being. However, according to the present study, the interaction between these variables (psychological distress and job satisfaction) does not affect the psychological well-being among nurses, which may be due to the age range of the participants, as the majority were young, their educational qualification, or the period of data collection (post-pandemic period) when the nurses have survived the most stressful period (the COVID-19 pandemic) and may have developed posttraumatic growth. Similarly, 17 found that even though a pandemic or other health emergencies could elicit mental stress, health professionals must be mentally balanced to resist such stress. There are limitations in the present study that we must highlight. Firstly, 120 participants were recruited for this study. Secondly, we use a single institution, i.e., all our participants were recruited from the federal teaching hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria, and this may affect the generalization of the results. Lastly, we adopted a cross-sectional research design, and data collection was done using self-report questionnaires that assessed causal inferences, which may affect the outcome of the study.
The present study explored the influence of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the interactive effect of psychological distress and job satisfaction on psychological well-being among nurses. The outcome of this study serves as a contribution to the body of scientific literature. The study suggests that a constant review of the working conditions of nurses, by providing them with training and retraining on the best global standards for handling patients with chronic illnesses or relapsing conditions and making available trained psychologists to work directly with them, will help in eliminating psychological distress among nurses. Also, all hospitals are expected to incorporate friendly working conditions for nurses, conditions that will enable them to achieve their personal goals, grow, and be satisfied with work.
We appreciate the nurses at Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria, for participating in this study.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
