Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/587
¹Department of Surgery, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
²Department of Radiology, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
³Department of Endocrinology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
*Corresponding Author: Bakhos Alhaddad, Department of Surgery, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Citation: Bakhos Alhaddad, Abdul Azim Hussain, Thair Abdulla, and Mahmoud Zari, (2025), A Landmark Diagnosis: First Reported Case of MEN1 Syndrome in a Qatari Patient with Literature Review, J Clinical Research and Reports, 21(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/587
Copyright: © 2025, Bakhos Alhaddad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 30 September 2025 | Accepted: 08 October 2025 | Published: 14 October 2025
Keywords: multiple endocrine neoplasia; primary hyperparathyroidism; gastroenteropancreatic tumors
Background: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, most often involving parathyroid, gastroenteropancreatic, and pituitary tumors. First described in the early 20th century and confirmed in 1997 to result from mutations in the MEN1 gene. Early recognition is essential for timely management and family screening.
Case Presentation: A 44-year-old woman presented for a second opinion on a recently diagnosed functional parathyroid adenoma, with prior workup showing elevated calcium (2.77 mmol/L) and PTH (141 pg/mL), and imaging suggestive of a left parathyroid adenoma plus a suspicious right thyroid nodule. Family history revealed possible pituitary tumor in her mother and thyroid cancer with pancreatic tumor in a cousin, raising suspicion for MEN1. Further evaluation included CT/MRI abdomen showing two small pancreatic tail lesions suspicious for neuroendocrine tumors, and pituitary MRI revealing a 5–6 mm microadenoma. Hormonal testing showed elevated prolactin (577 mIU/L). The diagnosis of MEN1 syndrome was made (parathyroid adenoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, pituitary microadenoma), and the positive genetic test confirmed the diagnosis. Multidisciplinary discussion recommended parathyroidectomy with surveillance of pancreatic and pituitary lesions.
Conclusion: This case represents the first reported diagnosis of MEN1 syndrome in Qatari patient, highlighting the need to recognize its presence within the population. Early identification is critical, as MEN1 is a rare hereditary syndrome that requires timely detection, multidisciplinary management, and genetic screening of at-risk relatives. Establishing awareness and screening for suspicious cases will improve outcomes and ensure appropriate long-term surveillance.
MEN: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
ZES: Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome
PHPT: Primary Hyperparathyroidism
GEP tumors: Gastroenteropancreatic tumors
FNA: Fine Needle Aspiration
CT: Computed Tomography
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PTH: Parathyroid Hormone
TSH: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone
FT4: Free Thyroxine 4
ACTH: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone
GH: Growth Hormone
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare inherited syndrome affecting the endocrine system, typically characterized by parathyroid tumors (95%), neoplasms of the endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tract (30–80%), and anterior pituitary gland (15–90%) [1]. The first documented case of what is now recognized as MEN was reported by Erdheim in 1903, describing an autopsy of a patient with acromegaly and enlargement of all four parathyroid glands [2]. Approximately two decades later, Cushing and Davidhoff documented the first case presenting with the classic triad of tumors characteristic of MEN1 [3]. In 1953, Underdahl and colleagues published the inaugural review of MEN1 syndrome, detailing 14 cases[4]. In 1954, Wermer was the first to characterize the MEN1 phenotype as following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, based on observations in a family where the father and four out of nine children were affected [5]. The original name “Wermer’s syndrome” was eventually replaced by the term MEN1 syndrome, which is now widely used [6]. In 1988, the MEN1 gene locus was localized to chromosome 11q13 through recombinant DNA analysis in two brothers with MEN1 [7]. The gene itself was subsequently identified via positional cloning, and mutations in MEN1 were confirmed as the cause of the syndrome in 1997 [8].
A 44-year-old female presented to the Surgery Clinic at Al Ahli Hospital seeking a second opinion regarding a recently diagnosed functional parathyroid adenoma, previously evaluated at another medical center. The patient is married, and has children. She had a medical history of lumbar disc prolapse.
Two months prior to her presentation at Al Ahli Hospital, the patient underwent routine blood tests as part of the preparation for initiating medical management for weight reduction. These tests revealed elevated serum calcium, prompting further evaluation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, which were found also elevated. Subsequent assessment at another medical center, including neck ultrasound, Sestamibi scan, and biopsies, confirmed the presence of a parathyroid adenoma and identified a suspicious thyroid nodule.
Adjusted serum calcium was elevated at 2.77 mmol/L (reference range: 2.10–2.60 mmol/L). Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was also elevated at 141 pg/mL (reference range: 12–88 pg/mL). Insulin levels were increased at 42.9 μIU/mL (reference range: 2.6–24.9 μIU/mL). Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and calcitonin levels were within normal limits.
Neck ultrasound revealed multiple hypoechoic nodules in the right thyroid lobe, the largest measuring 1.1 × 0.6 cm near the isthmus, containing small calcifications (TI-RADS 4). A smaller hypoechoic nodule measuring 7.4 × 0.2 cm was also noted. In the left thyroid lobe, a hypoechoic nodule measuring 1.9 × 1.0 × 0.6 cm was identified near the lower pole; in some images, it appeared to be located outside the thyroid gland, raising the possibility of a parathyroid adenoma. An additional small hypoechoic nodule measuring 0.4 × 0.3 cm with tiny calcifications was seen. Bilateral subcentimetre cervical lymph nodes were also observed.
Sestamibi scan demonstrated a focal area of increased tracer uptake localized to the posterior aspect of the left upper thyroid region, measuring approximately 0.8 cm in short axis and bordered by the esophagus, trachea, and thyroid gland. No ectopic parathyroid tissue was identified. The findings were suggestive of a left parathyroid adenoma. (Figure 1)

Figure 1: ⁹⁹ᵐTc-sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy of the neck at 20 minutes and 2 hours shows increased focal uptake, suggestive of a left parathyroid adenoma.
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the left-sided nodule revealed parathyroid tissue, confirming the diagnosis of a parathyroid adenoma.
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the suspicious right thyroid nodule revealed non-Diagnostic result (cyst fluid only).
Based on the above investigations, the patient was scheduled for surgical management of the parathyroid adenoma, specifically a left parathyroidectomy under general anesthesia, at her initial medical center. At this stage, the patient presented to our hospital seeking a second opinion. A comprehensive family history assessment was performed and the patient described a tumor in her mother, who passed away many years ago. Although no medical records were available, the tumor’s reported location was suggestive of the pituitary gland. Additionally, the patient reported a family history of thyroid cancer and pancreatic tumor in her cousin residing in Bahrain. Given this information, the possibility of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndrome was considered.
Neck ultrasound was repeated and revealed a hypoechoic, oblong-shaped soft tissue nodule located at the inferior lateral border of the left thyroid lobe, highly suggestive of a parathyroid adenoma. Another oblong hypoechoic nodule was identified at the junction between the isthmus and
the right thyroid lobe, demonstrating vascularity on color Doppler imaging. Additionally, multiple small hypoechoic soft tissue nodules were scattered throughout the right thyroid lobe.
The ultrasound results were reviewed with the radiology team, who considered the right thyroid nodule to be suspicious based on its radiological features. Consequently, a decision was made to perform a repeat ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the large right thyroid nodule, as the previous biopsy performed at HMC was nondiagnostic.
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the suspicious right thyroid nodule was repeated and revealed atypia of undetermined significance.
To evaluate the possibility of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome based on her family history, despite the absence of related symptoms, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI scans of the abdomen and pelvis, as well as an MRI of the pituitary gland with contrast, were performed.
Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed 11 mm enhancing lesion in the tail of pancreas, A separate 5 mm lesion on the surface of the pancreas anteriorly, and third enhancing nodule in the tail posterior surface measuring 4.5 mm. (Figure 2)

Figure 2: Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with red arrow indicating the location of pancreatic lesions.
MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast demonstrated an arterially enhancing nodule within the tail of the pancreas, measuring up to 9 mm, suspicious for a neuroendocrine tumor. Additionally, a subtle separate lesion at the same level in the pancreatic tail, corresponding to enhancement seen on the CT scan, is likely indicative of a secondary lesion. (Figure 3)

Figure 3: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with red arrows indicating the location of pancreatic tail lesions.
Brain MRI with dynamic contrast of the pituitary gland revealed a 5 to 6 mm nodule in the left portion of the gland, extending into the posterior half. The nodule exhibited delayed or absent early enhancement, with a well-defined delayed enhancing margin compared to the surrounding pituitary tissue. On delayed images, the lesion showed uniform enhancement, with the pituitary stalk centrally located and aligned, consistent with a microadenoma. (Figure 4)

Figure 4: Contrast-enhanced Brain MRI with red arrow indicating the location of pituitary gland lesion.
The patient was diagnosed as MEN 1 Syndrome (Functional parathyroid adenoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and pituitary microadenoma). She was referred to the leading academic teaching hospital in Qatar (Hamad Medical Corporation “HMC”) for the management.
At HMC, further hormonal tests were conducted: Prolactin was elevated at 577 mIU/L (reference range: 102–495 mIU/L), while ACTH, cortisol, estradiol, FSH, LH, TSH, FT4, IGF-1, and gastrin levels were within normal limits.
Targeted Variant Testing for the MEN1 Gene “c.1546dup, p.(R516Pfs*15)” was performed, and the result was positive.
The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting, where surgical management of the parathyroid adenoma was recommended. Close monitoring and regular evaluation of the pancreatic and pituitary lesions were also advised.
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare inherited syndrome affecting the endocrine system. It affects roughly 1 in 30,000 individuals, occurring equally in males and females, with no preference for any particular ethnic or racial group [9].
In Qatar, two previously published case reports have described MEN1 syndrome in non-Qatari patients: the first involved a 30-year-old man diagnosed at Hamad Medical Corporation in 2021, and the second described a 15-year-old boy diagnosed at Sidra Hospital in 2024 (10,11). Our report is, to the best of our knowledge, the first documented case of MEN1 syndrome in a patient of Qatari nationality.
Most MEN1 patients have a positive family history of the syndrome. The condition follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, meaning that an affected parent carries a 50% risk of passing it on to each child. MEN1 gene mutations are detectable in approximately 70–95% of affected patients [8].
MEN 1 characteristic tumors include: 1) Parathyroid adenoma (90%), 2) Enteropancreatic tumor (30–70%): gastrinoma (40%), insulinoma (10%), nonfunctioning and PPoma (20–55%), glucagonoma (1%), VIPoma (1%), 3) Pituitary adenoma (30–40%): prolactinoma (20%), somatotropinoma (10%), corticotropinoma (5%), nonfunctioning (5%), 4) Associated tumors: adrenal cortical tumor (40%), pheochromocytoma (1%), bronchopulmonary NET (2%), thymic NET (2%), gastric NET (10%), lipomas (30%), angiofibromas (85%), collagenomas (70%), meningiomas (8%) [12].
MEN1 is considered a likely diagnosis in patients who exhibit endocrinopathy in two of the three typically involved organs, or in those with an endocrinopathy in one of these organs accompanied by a first-degree family history of MEN1 [8]. Approximately 50% of affected individuals exhibit clinical signs and symptoms by age 20, with over 95
This case represents the first reported diagnosis of MEN1 syndrome in Qatari patient, highlighting the need to recognize its presence within the population, as it is a rare inherited syndrome affecting the endocrine system with some associated non-endocrine tumors. Early detection of MEN1 is crucial for enhancing disease outcomes and survival in both patients and their affected family members. Patients should be cared for by a multidisciplinary team of specialists with expertise in diagnosing and treating endocrine tumors, to enable appropriate genetic screening of family members and to ensure that affected patients undergo the correct surveillance protocols.
Bakhos Alhaddad: Diagnosis of the Case, study concept and design, data collection and analysis, writing the paper.
Abdul Azim Hussain: critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the paper.
Thair S. Abdulla: image evaluation and interpretation, final approval of the paper.
Mahmoud Zari: critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the paper.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This case report was approved by the ethics committee, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar. A copy of the approval letter is available for review upon request.
Consent
Verbal and written informed consent were obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,