AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/019
1 Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR), Razi Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran – Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Saeed Shoja Shafti, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR), Razi Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran – Iran.
Citation: Saeed Shoja Shafti (2021), A Didactic Dilemma in Emerging Societies: Devaluing Journal Club in Medical Working out, J. New Medical Innovations and Research, 2(4): DOI: 10.31579/2767-7370/019
Copyright: © 2021 Saeed Shoja Shafti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 April 2021 | Accepted: 25 May 2021 | Published: 16 June 2021
Keywords: journal club; medical education; medical training; educational instruments
A journal club is a scholastic conference in which a group of persons discuss issued articles, providing an opportunity for a shared effort to keep up with the current writings. The emphasis of journal clubs has supposedly shifted over the years. What was once a setting in which the world's recent literature was analyzed became a setting for talking over clinical issues raised by the writings and, most recently, a setup for learning critical reading abilities to physicians or other associated authorities. Nevertheless, so far there is no generally accepted definition of journal club, even though this academic method has been around for more than a century and has evolved basically during this period. In the present paper, conceptual and applied features of journal club, especially in developing countries, is surveyed, to discuss an apparent underrating of journal club in some medical departments, which could be due to misunderstanding of new philosophies, or to talk about the necessity of modification of an academic misconduct, which could be attributable to didactic unawareness.
A journal club is a scholastic conference in which a group of persons discusses issued articles, providing an opportunity for a shared effort to keep up with the current writings [1]. A journal club serves three goals: a) teach and improve critical evaluation skills, increase exposure to quickly evolving medical writings and help in informed clinical training; b) They speed up better familiarity and literature cognizance through group discussion with peers; c) They give an exclusive chance to endorse interest in research while learning from professionals about knowledge breaks and future research queries [1]. The emphasis on journal clubs has supposedly shifted over the years. What was once a setting in which the world's recent literature was analyzed became a setting for talking over clinical issues raised by the writings and, most recently, a setup for learning critical reading abilities to doctors or other associated authorities [2]. Nevertheless, so far there is no generally accepted definition of journal club, even though this academic method has been around for more than a century and has evolved basically during this period [3]. On the other hands, there is a huge potential to make journal clubs dynamic, modern and interactive and keeping them alive by dispelling obsolete opinions. Journal clubs help the post-graduates in keeping well-informed of new data, endorsing attentiveness of current research discoveries, learning to critique and assess investigation and inspiring use of inquiry in practice [4,5]. So, improvement of knowledge and reading routines, while keeping the impetus of medical information may create interest for research. Since the regular educational sittings, formal appraisals, or integrated evidence-based medicine teaching scarcely challenging this curriculum, journal clubs remain crucial in post-graduate medical education [1]. Evidence-based medicine is defined as the 'conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients' [6]. The alternate to this is 'I do as I wish’, or whim-based medicine, or ‘I do as my teacher does’, or eminence-based medicine, and they both are neither standardized nor cost-effective and definitely not reproducible and often pitifully defenseless in the court of law. Devotion to evidence-based practice necessitates latest information and a thorough understanding of critical evaluation to navigate the minefield of medical works which adds on every day at shocking extents. Regrettably, physicians often begin clinical life deficient in these abilities as these talents are not taught amply to them in medical schools. A journal club fills in this break of data and helps one practice evidence-based medicine from now on [1]. In the present paper, conceptual and applied features of journal club, especially in developing countries, is surveyed, to discuss an apparent underrating of journal club in some medical departments, which could be due to misunderstanding of new philosophies, or to talk about the necessity of modification of an academic misconduct, which could be attributable to didactic unawareness.
From the time in 1877, when Sir William Osler started the first formal journal club for undergraduates at McMaster University, nearly all good departments, teaching various divisions of Medicine and Surgery, have attempted to have a journal club [7]. Sir William originally initiated with the idea of expediting distribution of high-priced journals and later advanced it into a book and journal club, which met over dinner to check the newest in medical research. He wanted that the journal club should 'afford opportunities, which after graduating you never get, of learning how to prepare papers and express your ideas correctly'. He also hoped the meetings would secure 'training in the difficult science of debate' [7]. These aims of promoting the discussion and critique of research remain largely the essence of every journal club even today [1]. The first randomized controlled trial about the effect of journal clubs on knowledge and the critical judgment was done in 1988. Medical interns received either journal club teaching or a series of conferences. Approximately 86% of the journal club group testified developments in their reading behaviors compared with 0% in the control group. Journal club contributors, as well, attained greater knowledge scores [8]. Journal clubs were found to improve reading conducts, information of epidemiology and statistics and use of medical texts in practice. It enabled an interest in research and this, in turn, powered evidence-based medicine and delivery of a medium that inspired discussion and debate [1]. As said earlier, initially the main goal of the journal club was to help applicants keep up-to-date of the growing body of medical writings. Over time, the emphasis of journal club has progressed to teaching critical evaluation skills and evidence-based medicine, while maintaining the original goal of helping apprentices and practicing physicians to keep informed about the research works in their field [9]. Currently, refining reading habits, teaching critical assessment abilities, increasing the use of medical writings in clinical practice, improving patients’ care, and increasing knowledge of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, are among the main goals of journal club (Table 1) [10]. On the other hand, the flexibility and academic challenge provided by journal club have encouraged its usage not only in general medicine and several medical specialties, but also in dentistry, nursing and other related health professions [11,12,13].
Over the last 10 years, a number of publications have talked about the aims, setting, and teaching approaches of residential journal clubs and evaluated the related outcomes [14-17]. Though many articles discuss how journal clubs can be used to appraise medical writings, only a few have studied what physicians are really doing [18]. While journal club is a respected method of reviewing and discussing the scientific works in medicine, till now there is no generally accepted description of that [18-26]. Also, while most training programs support journal club, they are not similarly successful in meeting their scholastic purposes or maintaining resident’s attentiveness (Table 4 and 5) [19,22].
Teaching and using critical appraisal skills 19 |
Regular and scheduled meetings 19 |
Appropriate meeting timing and incentives 19 |
Regular attendance by faculty members 20 |
Mandatory attendance by apprentices 20, or at least 50% attendance 21 |
Smaller size of participants (12 or less residents) 22 |
Adequate longevity of program ( at least two years) 23 |
Clear short-term and long-term goals 20 |
A trained journal club leader for choosing papers and leading discussion 18,19 and 24-26 |
Circulating papers prior to the meeting 19 |
Proper using of internet for online conferences, broader participation of contributors or wider presentation of session 20 |
Summarizing of journal club findings 19 |
Use of a structured checklist 18, 27 |
Table 4: Characteristics of successful journal clubs.
Lack of time |
Inadequate preparation |
Lack of clear goals |
Lack of interest |
Insufficient participation |
Lack of designated leader |
Table 5: Common reasons for discontinuing journal club [28,29].
But unfortunately the situation of journal club in developing societies is not in all places or departments suitable, which can be due to lack of pragmatic insight or rational knowledge about the basic principles and goals of journal club (Table 1). Unsystematic choice of articles, non-attendance of accomplished director or well-informed faculties in meetings, lack of planned strategy for evaluation of sessions, deficiency of incentives or rubrics for comprehensive presence of apprentices, subjective stress on only one aspect of journal club, like keeping in touch with the growing body of medical writings or news bulletin, focusing on abstracts in place of full articles, replacing systematic research articles or clinical studies with short communications, opinions, commentaries or letter to editors, which usually involve open or non-randomized investigations or analyses, ceaseless choice of review articles or systematic review articles, which usually get around detailed method and materials of designated researches and may become dependent on analyzer’s inclinations or orientations, are among the messy performances of some medical departments in developing countries with respect to journal club conferences. Also, though the scientific value of an individual article has nothing to do with the impact factor of a journal, and genuine impact factors for journals vary noticeably across disciplines, selecting articles, habitually or uncritically, from journals with impact factor of ≤1, instead of journals with impact factor of ≥3 (3 = good, 10 = excellent), may weaken the said objectives due to conceivable methodological inaccuracies or uncertain conclusions [27]. On the other hand, some scholars have suggested choosing a good journal with a very high rejection rate. For example, the New England Journal of Medicine has a rejection rate of over 90%, thus ensuring the scientific quality of its papers. Similarly, looking for the name of the institution, the author's name, the probable grant support, and a note about whether the selected paper was awarded by an organization or presented at an international meeting, and finally the gap between the dates of submission and acceptance have been proposed as helpful parameters for deciding on a journal club article [1]. Also, considering journal club as a cross-sectional and unidirectional academic instrument, instead of a longitudinal and multidimensional educational apparatus, which can be shortened, displaced or deleted at all, if seems compulsory to the residents or faculties, roots in misunderstanding or unfamiliarity with regard to present speed of advancement of medical sciences and skills. Future methodical researches depend on past informative achievements and such an appreciated purpose cannot be attained by sidestepping the current scientific techniques and outlooks. On the other hand, since journal club is a link between earlier studies and current explorations, which can formulate the progression of parallel examinations, chronologically or conjointly, it is an applicable enlightening instrument for planning the algorithm of upcoming proposals or researches. For the same reason the scientific value of nominated journal or article is an important issue in journal club. Residents need genuine, sturdy and scrupulous foundations for planning and constructing their own proposals, and a well-thought-of article from an esteemed journal can make such an intention available. Reducing journal club into a just informing maneuver, which is a well-known attitude among faculties and residents, may sometimes end into more restriction of abstracts, for saving time, and reading merely conclusions of a series of nominated articles. Such a scheme, while is valued during final exams, is not appreciated as an educational program. Likewise, restricting article choice to a specific range of people, such as residents in the last academic year, who are preparing themselves for final tests, instead of an all-inclusive policy that includes all residents, may discard generalization of the aforesaid academic benefits (Table 1).
An educational instrument and stratagem |
An scholastic method for improving patients’ care |
Increasing the use of medical literature in clinical practice |
Keeping up-to-date of the growing body of medical texts |
Talking over clinical issues raised by the literatures |
Analyzing recent literature |
Learning critical reading skills |
Refining reading habits |
Teaching critical assessment skills |
Translate JC activities into evidence-based practice |
Increasing knowledge of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics |
Table 1: Essential objectives of journal club [1-5].
Undoubtedly, any particular group with its own purposes can have and do their own conferences, without making vulnerable the curriculum. All apprentices should know that each course or program of study has its specific essences and ideas, which should be presented by related instructors from the opening steps. So, some preliminary exploratory sessions for new learners, before starting of official meetings, is a proper maneuver for ultimate attainment of such academic goals. Since some of the present apprentices will be the future academics, without getting the main keystones of a program they cannot carry out their pedagogic responsibilities meticulously and may not transfer a through concept to the next learners. But how such an academic process is possible? Maybe by means of repeated inquiries (Table 2) [26].
Q 1-In your opinion what is the most important goal of a journal club (JC)? Q 2-Which of the above goal/goals is achieved by JC? Q 3- Found attending JC to be of educational value. Q 4-You found preparing for JC to be of educational value. Q 5-In your opinion JC helped in development of research protocols. Q 6-Has your research work/dissertation come out of a JC? Q 7-Presentation at JC helped refine your research work? Q 8- In your opinion JC provides good review of public health related literature. Q 9-In your opinion JC provides stimulus to further review a topic. Q 10- In your opinion JC facilitates development of critical appraisal skills. Q 11-Please indicate the most important reason/reasons for your decision to attend JC. Q 12- Which key journals would you like to be made mandatory for the residents to review? Q 13-Which of the methods for continuing education do you prefers the most? Q 14- Do you think that introduction of a standard check list for review of different segments of an article would be helpful to improve resident participation? Q 15-In your opinion the current format of JC is satisfactory. Q 16-In your opinion is residency program faculty participation in JC satisfactory? Q 17- In your opinion is departmental faculty participation in JC satisfactory? Q 18- Have you ever presented a mock presentation before JC? Q 19- In your opinion is presenting a mock presentation a valuable exercise in preparing for JC? Q 20- Have you ever been assigned the responsibility of JC coordination? Q 21- In your opinion is/was coordinating JC was a helpful experience to your own residency training? Q 22- Is the timing of journal club (i.e. the first thing in the morning) appropriate? Q 23- Recommendations to improve over all quality of JC. |
Table 2: A questionnaire for valuation of pedagogic usefulness of journal club [27].
This may give the necessary feedback for further modification of educative efforts. Moreover, the routine evaluation of sessions by listeners can emphasize the importance of meetings and highlights effectively the objectives of journal club (Table 3).
Timeliness of resident preparation and communication regarding the development of the presentation |
Analysis of the study design, validity and applicability of the results to his/her practice |
The resident’s overall contribution to journal club in terms of presenting their paper or leading the discussion |
Appropriateness of visual aids during conference |
Concise and accurate presentation of article |
Ability to answer questions from the audience |
Overall performance |
Table 3: Appraisal of presentation of journal club.
While it is comprehensible that changing academic routines, as like as other conducts, is not always easy or free from other intervening factors, medical education needs a continuous upgrading, if it desires to become perfect. In addition, there is no guarantee that underestimation of a specific course may not spread to other set of courses. Since the educative instruments are not indefinite, every fragment of a training program should be considered prudently. Maybe, relative deficiency of academic literature with respect to pedagogic strategies or guidance, in opposite to various available clinical medical textbooks, may have increased the scholastic negligence, especially in some developing countries. Anyhow it is not deniable that providing general educational recommendations, too, demands specific systematic research and formulations. Todays, for some scholars in developing countries, scheme of journal club seems mostly as an academic routine than a methodical style. While some aspects of journal club, like setting or mentorship, have been probed by interested scholars [18-27], the foremost acknowledged purposes of journal club (Table 1), as well, demand disciplined study individually. Such a standpoint is in accord with the finding of Lentscher et al., who sought to find the effect of a structured journal club curriculum that incorporated The Lancet Handbook of Essential Concepts in Clinical Research on objective and self-assessed knowledge of residents, based on a retrospective observational study, and found no significant improvement in resident self-assessed knowledge following curriculum implementation; though There was a trend toward improved objective knowledge. So, he as well concluded that there is a lack of standardized and well-studied methods to teach residents how to check and appraise medical literature and research [28]. Therefore, while Training in literature appraisal and statistical interpretation is one of the residency training requirements, and often a journal club format is used to teach this competency, this teaching modality is not standardized or well-studied regarding its efficacy. So, despite the fact there is huge published literature, which describe the presentation of journal club in different surroundings and for different health clients, no ‘Gold Standard’ for conducting a journal club, or to assess its usefulness in translating knowledge into practice is obvious [29]. Thus, it is an ongoing challenge for clinicians to plan and sustain an exciting and educational journal club blueprint that helps the contributors to stay up to date with the scientific and medical texts, and to translate journal club activities into evidence-based practice [30,31]. So, lack of valid papers with respect to the usefulness of journal club in the field of medical education is still visible [32]. There are many reports of its use as an instructive instrument and stratagem, but almost none about its application for discussing medical published papers from an educative standpoint [33]. Achievement of such intentions will help to shape analogous and arranged journal club sessions in all places.
Journal club, as an important educative instrument, demands a novel appraisal, theoretically and pragmatically, especially in developing countries, for realization of its enhanced short-term and long-term valued goals. Achievement of scientific purposes demands correction of academic attitude, abating unreasonable underrating, and expansion of pedagogic objectives and successes.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
