A Comprehensive Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/163

A Comprehensive Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Coronary Syndrome

  • Velina Georgieva Stoyanova 1*

St. George- Pernik”, 77 “St. St. Kiril and Metodii str. 

*Corresponding Author: Velina Georgieva Stoyanova, St. George- Pernik”, 77 “St. St. Kiril and Metodii str.

Citation: Velina Georgieva Stoyanova, (2021) A Comprehensive Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Coronary Syndrome. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(9); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/163

Copyright: © 2021 Velina Georgieva Stoyanova, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Received: 01 April 2021 | Accepted: 26 April 2021 | Published: 03 May 2021

Keywords: chronic coronary syndrome; cardiovascular mortality; echocardiography

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a chronic progressive disease with social significance, result of obstructive or non- obstructive atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in the epicardial arteries. CAD is one of the leading causes for deterioration in quality of life and cardiovascular mortality. CAD has dynamic character and its major clinical presentations are: acute coronary syndromes / STEMI, NSTEMI, UA/ and chronic coronary syndromes. In this case report we present the treatment algorithm in patient with chronic coronary syndrome: from optimal medical therapy, through objective methods of examination leading to the decision for interventional treatment and the importance of regular follow-up

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a chronic progressive disease with social significance, result of obstructive or non- obstructive atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in the epicardial arteries. CAD is one of the leading causes of  deterioration in quality of life and cardiovascular mortality. CAD has dynamic character and its major clinical presentations are: acute coronary syndromes / STEMI, NSTEMI, UA/ and chronic coronary syndromes. In this case report we present the treatment algorithm in patient with chronic coronary syndrome: from optimal medical therapy, through objective methods of examination leading to the decision for interventional treatment and the importance of regular follow-up.

Chronic coronary syndrome has various clinical presentations1:

  1. patients with suspected CAD and “stable” anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnea;
  2. patients with new onset of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and suspected CAD;
  3. asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with stabilized symptoms <1 year after an ACS or patients with recent revascularization;
  4. asymptomatic and symptomatic patients >1 year after initial diagnosis or revascularization;
  5. patients with angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease;
  6. asymptomatic subjects in whom CAD is detected at screening.

Clinical case

The following clinical case represents a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and treatment of patient with chronic coronary syndrome. A 61-year old male who presents with angina during minimal physical exertion. He has been diagnosed with coronary artery disease since 2017 when he was admitted in hospital with unstable angina. A coronary angiogram was performed and revealed significant stenosis of RCAm and borderline stenosis of LADp. The RCA stenosis has been intervened with implantation of one SES /SESx1/2.25/13mm/16atm/with optimal angiographic result. The patient is taking dual antiplatelet therapy, beta blocker, ACE inhibitor, calcium antagonist, statin and insulin. He has been asymptomatic for two years until now, when he presents with stable angina grade III CCS.

Figure 1: Echocardiography on admission

All laboratory findings are normal, as is rest ECG. Echocardiogram shows normal left ventricular function, no significant valve lesions.

Based on these findings a HEART TEAM took the decision to optimize patient’s therapy by adding nitrate and trimetazidine.  Two months later the patient presents with improved symptoms, but persisting angina during physical exertion.

Based on patient’s clinical presentation and risk factors: gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, prior revascularization and according to most recent guidelines  on  Chronic Coronary Syndromes 2,3 a SPECT was performed as non- invasive method for detection of myocardial ischemia. During the examination the patient didn’t show typical angina, but there were signs of hypoperfusion in the territory of LAD. Because of present stable angina grade IIICCS anddespite being on optimal medical ant-ischemic therapy and the presence of induced myocardial ischemia during SPECT - after discussion a Heart Team decided to perform coronary angiogram with invasive evaluation of LAD stenosis.

The procedure revealed optimal result from the previous intervention and significant stenosis of proximal LAD that was treated with implantation of one SES (SES 3.5/19mm /14atm/. After the intervention the patient was stable, without angina. Three months later he presented with persistent fatigue and suboptimal control of blood pressure and heart rate. A change of therapy was made with higher doses of beta blocker and ACE inhibitor. Six months later the patient was asymptomatic, with optimal blood pressure and heart rate levels, reduced weight and optimal glycemic control.

AB significant stenosis of LADpPCI LADp (SES BioMime 3.5/19mm /14atm)

Chronic coronary syndrome has variety of clinical presentations. That’s why there is a need for detailed clinical evaluation with comprehensive and individualized approach. It is of great significance to find the balance and according to guidelines to find the right strategy for every patient.

Conclusions

Risk stratification plays a key role in the approach of chronic coronary syndromes as it defines the strategy- conservative or interventional. Based on the progressive and dynamic character of the disease a regular health check is of great importance.

 


 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova