AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/300
ENT Consultant \ ENT Department in Baaquba teaching Hospital
*Corresponding Author: Nasser Khalil Muhammed. ENT Consultant \ ENT Department in Baaquba teaching Hospital.
Citation: Nasser Khalil Muhammed, Amer Jawad Kadhim , Samih Faiq Fadhil, (2023) A Comparative Study on Intraoperative Local Mitomycine_ c Application in Primary Endoscopic Dacrocystorhinostomy (dcr) with Conventional Primary Endoscpic (dcr). J Clinical Research and Reports, 13(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/300
Copyright: © 2023 Nasser Khalil Muhammed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 23 January 2023 | Accepted: 31 January 2023 | Published: 03 February 2023
Keywords: mitomycin c; endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy ; epiphora
Epiphora is an overflow of tears onto the face due to imperfect drainage of the tear conducting passages or excess lacrimal production.
Dacrocystorhinostomy ( DCR) is recognized as the most suitable treatment for patients with obstruction of the lacrimal system at the level of lacrimal sac or in nasolacrimal duct with aim of creation a bypass between lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity ( 1 ) The two most frequent causes of DCR failure are obstruction of the common canaliculus and closure of the osteotomy site. Thus if we can inhibit fibrous tissue growth and scarring by applying antiproliferative agents over the anastamosed flaps and osteostomy site , the failure rate may be decreased. (2)Mitomycin C is an antibiotic, antineoplastic agent inhibiting DNA, RNA and Protein synthesis. ( 3 )
Objectives: To evaluate the use of local intraoperative Mitomycin C in endoscopic DCR and comparing this with endoscopic DCR without Mitomycin C.
Methods:
In our study, a total of 77 eyes diagnosed with aquired epiphora were divided into a (Mitomycin C group) that we use local application of Mitomycin C intraoperativly in endoscopic DCR, and a (Non Mitomycin C group) in which no Mitomycin C is used. All done at Al-amal- day-case private clinic and Baqubah teaching hospital since 7th of May 2019 till 1st of March 2022.
Surgical procedures steps is the same in both groups, except in that (Mitomycin C) group was subjected to an application of local mitomycin C 0.2mg\ml for 5 minutes and this was done with the aid of Merocele that soaked in this substance. Merocele soaked with Mitomycin C 0.2mg\ml was applied to the osteotomy site and the margines of the flaps of the opening of the lacrimal sac for 5 minutes. The results of surgeries in both groups were evaluated by both subjectivly by asking patients about the result of surgery and if they still complaining of excessive tearing or not , and also were evaluated objectivly (by flexible fibro-optic nasoendoscope) to see the site of surgery and the opening of the lacrimal sac to the nasal cavity
Results: 40 eyes that are the ( Non Mitomycin C group ) were evaluated after 9 months after surgery ,this evaluation is done subjectively and objectively ,38 cases were symptom free and the endoscopic findings showed us opend and clean openings of the fistulae we created .2 cases give history of excessive tearing (go with recurrence ),in this cases , no benefit from syringing, and the endoscopic finding showed fibrous tissue adhesions that come from the axilla of the middle turbinate to the opening of the sac we created and also extends to the nasal septum and surrounding tissues.
In the other group of the 37 cases ( Mitomycin C ) group , patients give no symptoms of excessive tearing except 1 case , flexible fibro_optic endonasal endoscopic examination of these patients showed patent orifices created in our surgeries with no adhesion or fibous bands affect the tears passageway.the recurrent epiphoric patient was got no benefit from syringing and the endoscopic findings (this was after 9 monthes of the surgery) showed adhesion bands surround the area near the orifice created , ( really the septum in this case was near the orifice(not attached to it) but our decision during the surgery was not to do septoplasty )
Conclusion: intraoperative Mitomyicin C has little( no significant) effect on the results of DCR surgery.
Epiphora is an overflow of tears onto the face due to imperfect drainage of the tear conducting passages or excess lacrimal production.It is a common condition with many causes, a thorough history and examination are required to provide the appropriate treatment tailored to the underlying cause [4]. Epiphora not has a negative impact on patients comfort only, but also put them at risk for probable intraocular operations in the future [5] . Probing as a first line therapy shows 82% successullness in cases of nasolacrimal duct obstructions,so it is recomended as initial treatment procedure [3]. Medical treatment with nasal steroid spray may be effective but the majority of obstructed cases will require surgical intervention in the form of Dacrocystorhinostomy [6]. So DCR is the treatment of choice in resistant cases.
It should be known that epiphora may generate and lead to serious problems [5]
Dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) (external and endoscopic approach) (a procedure performed for the treatment of epiphora) revealed high succeess rate and low risk of complicationsis [7]. Significant epiphora due to obstruction,chronic conjuctivitis, dacrocystitis & Dacryoliths in lacrimal sac causing periodic episodes of nasolacrimal duct obstruction are the main indications for DCR [8]. Endonasal DCR involves creation of a large ostium and construction of nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps [9] Failure to maintain this patency will result in failure of the procedure [2] . Failure is generally defined as having symptoms of excessive tearing with the inability to irrigate [10]. The two main causes of failure of dacrocystorhinostomy are obstruction of the main canaliculus and closure of the osteotomy site by fibrosis and scar formation [2] Mitomycin C (MMC) is an antineoplastic agent that inhibits the synthesis of DNA, cellular RNA, and protein by inhibiting the synthesis of collagen by fibroblasts [11] It is an alkylatng agent that inhibits fibroblast proliferation and alter wound healing response leading to less fibrosis and scar formation around the common canaliculus and osteotomy site [2] Mitomycin C (MMC) is a chemotherapeutic antibiotic isolated from the broth of Streptomyces caespitosus. Its mode of action mimics that of ionising radiation. Cross linkage of the DNA base pairs adenine and guanine inhibits DNA synthesis in all phases of the cell cycle. Mitomycin C also causes breakage of single stranded DNA. Although its action is non-cell cycle specific, rapidly dividing cells are preferentially sensitive to these effects.[12] MMC has been used as an adjuvant treatment in DCR since 1998 to prevent excessive scarring and fibrosis causing adhesions in the postoperative period [13] They found attenuated epithelium with intracytoplasmic vacuoles and loose subepithelial connective tissue that was hypocellular on histopathological examination [14] Shi ming cheng and his colleagues concluded that intraoperative MMC application seems to be a safe adjuvant that could reduce the closure rate of the osteotomy and enhance the success rate after both primary and revision EN-DCR [11] . Intraoperative mitomycin C application is effective in increasing the success rate of DCR surgery in standard nasolacrimal duct obstruction, and no significant complications resulted from its use. [10] Güler Zilelioğlu in his paper said that Adjunctive use of a wound healing inhibitor is considered to increase the success rate of endoscopic endonasal DCR. Its intraoperative use seems to be easy and safe. But the study of this limited series shows no benefit in using it [16]. However, according to others, adjuvant use of MMC to prevent failure in Ex-DCR or EnDCR is innocuous and does not change the chance of success of the DCR procedure [13] Obstruction of the puncta or canaliculi is not an infrequent event after topical 0.04% MMC [12]. Contraindications of Mitomycin-C for topical use One-eyed patients, pregnant women, very old patients, severe dry eye, those with predisposing condition to corneal ulceration or poor healing such as immunocompromised patients or patients with Sjogren’s syndrome, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, acne rosacea or herpetic keratitis [15].
This study done to compare results of DCR that use local intraoperative application of Mitomycin C, with DCR that done conventionaly without this application use. All done at Al-amal- day-case private clinic and Baqubah teaching hospital since 7th of May 2019 till 1st of March 2022.
Endoscopic DCR done for patients (the ages range from 11years old to 70 years old), they were complaining from excessive tearing due to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Final diagnosis was done by the ophthalmologist Dr Amer J. K.We exclude congenital cases, canalicular obstruction, revision surgery, traumatic obstruction ,excessive tearing due to previous facial nerve palsy ,ectropion and connective tissue disease.
There are two groups of patients: (Mitomycin C group) that we use local Mitomycin C intraoperativly in endoscopic DCR, and a (Non Mitomycin C group) in which no Mitomycin C is used. In both groups we followed same surgical steps except that final step in which we applyed Mitomycin C 0.2mg\ml to the osteotomy site and the margins of the flaps of the opening of the lacrimal sac (this of course in the Mitomycin C group).Any patient in both groups need septoplasty to facilitate entrance to the site of the axilla of the middle turbinate or the site of nasolacrimal duct, we did it (Otolaryngologist Dr Nasser). Under general anaesthesia with hypotensive technique , a local nasal decongestion using Merocele soaked in Adrenaline:Lidocain 1:100000, waiting for about 5 minutes a no. 15 scalpel blade is used to make the initial mucosal incisions .The first incision is made horizontaly 8 to 10 mm above the axilla of the middle turbinate, starting 3mm posterior to the axilla and coming forward about 10 mm to the frontal process of maxilla ,from this end start another vertical incision extending to the level of insersion of the inferior turbinate ,from this end start another inferior horizontal incision that extend posteriorly to the insersion of the Uncinate process, this mucosal flap is elevated by freer elevator ,when reach the junction of the soft lacrimal bone with the hard frontal process ,remove the lacrimal bone, then use a Hajek Koeffler punch to remove the lower part of the frontal process of the maxilla pushing the lacrimal sac ( for protection) by the tip of this punch ,bone removal continue anteriorly and superiorly untill no bone can be grasped by the punch, this will uncover the antero-inferior part of the sac,the rest of the thick bone up to the level of the anteror mucosal flap can be removed by a small (2-3 mm)chizzle that used for osteotomy in Rhinoplasty (I have no drill) ,in most of the cases Agger nasi cell will be exposed at this stage and its mucosa will be exposed ,bone will be removed untill all the lacrimal sac is exposed at this stage of the surgery, opthalmologist start to dilate the inferior punctum with punctum dilator , and a bowman lacrimal probe is pass to the sac , then when the probe is moved up and down in the sac ,its tip should be seen behind the wall to confirm being within the sac. Then DCR spear knife is used to make vertical incision as far posteriorly as possible , the sac is slit from top to bottom , DCR mini-sickle knife is used to make upper and lower releasing incision in the anterior flap so that the flap can be rolled out on the lateral nasal wall. Three mm soft tissue scissors are used to make upper and lower releasing incision in the posterior flap, and this flap is also rolled out, the sac now is completely marsupilised and lie on the lateral nasal wall. The mucosal flap is trimmed so that the superior and inferior mucosal flap are matched to the row bone above and below the opened lacrimal sac. Most of the middle of the original flap is removed so that we can approximate it to the mucosal flap and the healing occur by first intention rather than by second intention which leads to granulation tissue formation and later closure by scar formation. No silicon lacrimal intubation tubes are used, nasal mucosal flaps(anterior and posterior ) and lacrimal sac flaps were joined together with 5-0 vicryl suture. In the ( Mitomycin C group ),a piece of Merocele attached with a long thread soaked in 0.2mg\ml mitomycin C was placed over the anastomosed flaps and osteotomy site with the long thread passing through the nostril ,and was then removed after application time of 5 minutes by pulling the thread. a piece of Merocele attached to a thread is put on position to stabilize the flap.in the first post-operative day we remove the piece of merocele gently by pulling the thread, give broad-spectrum antibiotics for 7 days, starting nasal wash with normal saline, this wash we contiue with it at least for 2 weeks, really we instruct the patint to visit us in 1,3,10 days post operativly, then1,2,4,6 and 9 month post operativly,. The results of surgeries in both groups were evaluated by both subjectivly by asking patients about the result of surgery and if they still complaining of excessive tearing or not , and also were evaluated objectivly (by flexible fibro-optic nasoendoscope) to see the site of surgery and the opening of the lacrimal sac to the nasal cavity,(and by syringing).so we did naso-endoscopy to all patients at 9 month post-operative period ,but any patint had a complain of excesive tearing told us during the visit we will do syringing followed by nasal endoscopy to evaluate the condition.
In our study we did 77 DCR surgeries that we divide them into two groups, 1st is the (Mitomycin C group) ( 37 eyes ) in which we used to put(of course after the conventional surgery for both groups) Mitomycin C in concentration of (0.2mg\ml) on the margins of the flaps of the opening of the lacrimal sac and osteomy site for 5 minutes , 2nd group ( 40 eyes )( Non Mitomycin C group ) in which we just escape the step of putting Mitomycin C on the flaps . Concurrent septoplasty was done in 5 cases ,3 cases from Mitomycin group and 2 from non mitomycin group. The age of the patients is ranging from 11 to 70 years old ,55 were females and 22 were males, epiphora was the presenting symptoms in 53 cases while other patients were present with swelling in the lacrimal cyst region
Table (1): Distribution of patients according to gender.
Table (2): show no. Of cases of DCR done with and without Mitomycin c and no. and percentage of its complications
Otolaryngologists move in the recent years to the field of DCR after the evolution of endoscopic instrumentations. Epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction is managed successfully by this surgery .recurrence of excessive tearing with inability to irrigate is an expected complication of this surgery. In primary external and endoscopic DCR, the failure rate has been reported to be 5% -10% and 20% -40% respectivly [17 ], this is due to fibrosis and scar formation [2] , thus if we can reduce fibrous formation at the site of osteotomy and flaps ,the success rate of the surgery supposed to be bigger.[10] Mitomycin C is the substance that used in many centrs for this purpuse.
ln our study, the rate of success in group l (Mitomycin c groupe) is (100%), and in groupe II (non Mitomycin c groupe) is (97.5%). This means that Mitomycin c is of no additional benefit in endoscopic DCR. Tamata T.S. Sousa concluded that intraoperative use of Mitomycin c is safe and slightly improves the success rate of external or endoscopic DCR, however the evidence was very weak [13]. S.Liao said intraoperative Mitomycin C is effective in increasing the success rate of DCR surgery in standard nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery , and no significant complications resulted from its use [10]. Shi-ming Cheng concluded in his paper that intraoperatve Mitomycin C applications seems to be safe adjuvant that could reduce the closure rate of the osteotomy and enhance the success rate after both primary and revision endoscopic DCR [11].Our study is comparable with study of M.H. Roozitalab who concluded that the use of intraoperative Mitomycin C in DCR surgery does not change the success rate of this procedure [18]
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
