AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/184
Internal Medicine, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
*Corresponding Author: Gabriela Pereira, Internal Medicine, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
Citation: G Pereira, A Cardoso, M Rocha, U Embaló, J Cotter. (2022). A Case of Pharyngeal-Cervical-Brachial Variant of Guillain-Barré associated with Campilobacter Jejuni infection. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 10(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/184
Copyright: © 2022 Kafrouni Hazem, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attributiosn License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 12 October 2021 | Accepted: 07 January 2022 | Published: 14 January 2022
Keywords: guillain-barre syndrome (gbs); bilateral glossopharyngeal paralysis; pharyngeal-cervical-brachial variant; campylobacter jejuni
The pharyngeal-cervical-brachial variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare but well documented in the adult population, characterized by rapidly progressive weakness of oropharyngeal and cervicobrachial areas with areflexia in the upper limbs. We describe a 19-year-old young man with predominantly pharyngeal-cervical-brachial weakness and pronounced bulbar symptoms. Atypical Guillain-Barré variants can be challenging in early disease stage and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a young adult presenting with bulbar palsy.
Categories: Internal Medicine, Neurology
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a neurologic disease characterized by ascending paralysis, variable degrees of weakness, sensory abnormalities, and autonomic dysfunction. Its etiology is not entirely clarified, though there is evidence to support the hypothesis of a postinfectious autoimmune disorder. Almost 50 to 75 percent of the cases are preceded by an infection, whereby Campylobacter jejuni is the most common identified infectious trigger. Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Mycoplasma pneumonia and human immunodeficiency virus are also described to be related to this disease. Occasionally there have been reported cases that happen after vaccination of different types [1, 2].
The incidence in high-income countries is estimated to be 0.4–4.0 cases per 100,000 population and is slightly more common in males than females. It can occur at any age, but it becomes more frequent with advancing age [3, 4].
GBS is clinically characterized by an acute onset of generalized and symmetrical muscle weakness and areflexia from peripheral nerve involvement. However, other patterns are recognized where there is an unusual distribution of muscle involvement: external ocular muscle involvement with ataxia in Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), and oropharyngeal, neck and upper limb muscle involvement in pharyngeal-cervical-brachial (PCB) variant form, which incidence is relatively low [5, 6].
We present a case of a young man, 19 years old, a soccer player, with asthma, medicated with a rescue inhaler, without other relevant history or family history, was admitted to the Emergency Department due to dysphagia to solids and progressive weakness of the upper limbs with about 24h of evolution. He reported acute gastroenteritis about one week before.
The patient denied tobacco, alcohol or illicit drugs consumption, recent travel, recent exposure to unusual plants or animals or other allergens.
On examination, he was alert, afebrile, had no meningeal irritation signs. Syntax and comprehension of language were preserved, although he had some difficulty in articulating the speech. Pupils were isochoric and photoreactive with preserved direct and consensual reflections. Oculomotricity was preserved. He had no nystagmus, blepharoptosis or facial asymmetries. The soft palate could not be adequately raised on phonation and showed some limitation of the lingual protrusion.
On the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, strength was grade 4 in deltoids, 4 in the right forearm, 3 in the left forearm, and 5 in the lower limbs. Tendon reflexes in the arms were absent, but patella reflexes and Achilles reflexes were normal. Sensory examination was unremarkable.
The computerized angiotomography of supra-aortic vessels and brain showed no alterations. Routine laboratory tests and arterial blood gas analysis were within the normal range. A lumbar puncture was performed, whose cerebrospinal fluid contained 4 cell/mcl, with a protein level of 29.3 mg/dl, the glucose level of 70mg/dl and the results of meningitis/encephalitis panel were negative.
On the second day of hospitalization, he was transferred to the Intensive Unit Care because of the rapidly progressive clinical aggravation with development of flaccid tetraparesis with predominance in the upper limbs, dysarthria, severe dysphagia for solids and liquids, and restrictive pulmonary syndrome requiring continuous aspiration of secretions and a nasogastric tube for feeding. It was performed a magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine that had no changes. By that time, treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (0.4 mg/Kg/day) was started because of the high suspicion of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. All cultural examinations were negative, except for Campylobacter jejuni PCR was positive in the feces. Serotypes of atypical agents and autoimmunity were negative. Also, antiganglioside antibodies were negative.
On the third day, a nerve conduction study was performed and showed severe neurogenic alterations, at the level of all the studied leads, more accentuated at the level of the upper and distal limbs, with low motor amplitude, but normal conduction velocities, of the radial and posterior tibial nerves bilaterally and common peroneal on the left. The remaining conduction studies (including sensitive studies) were within the normal range.
The clinical situation stabilized and began to improve after the third day of treatment. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was required due to persistent severe dysphagia. Functional respiratory tests with impaired peak cough flow measurements at the beginning of hospitalization started improving progressively. Even though the patient did not need artificial ventilation or oxygen supplementation, he needed assistance in coughing using a Cough-assist.
He was discharged after 26 days and admitted to a Rehabilitation Center for physical and motor rehabilitation and speech therapy.
After one year of follow-up and rehabilitation, the patient recovered muscle strength of the four limbs and had no speech changes. However, dysphagia was only completely resolved after 18 months.
The Pharyngeal-Cervical-Brachial (PCB) variant of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is a rare form of presentation, characterized by marked progressive weakness of the oropharynx and neck and proximal upper limbs, usually sparing strength and reflexes of the lower limbs. However, it is documented in literature that some cases, similar to our patient, have had later mild lower limb muscle weakness and/or areflexia, which does not exclude the diagnosis when present. Frequently, there is a rapid progressive pharyngeal weakness, leading to the need for intubation and ventilation due to excessive accumulation of secretions [5, 7, 8].
The diagnosis of this condition is based on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and nerve conduction study, after excluding several possible differential diagnosis. It is expected to have a high CSF protein, as fluid albuminocytological dissociation is present in 42.0% of the cases [9].
Commonly, electro-physiological studies are characterized by the absence of F waves in upper limbs and rarely in the lower limbs as well. Essentially GBS is divided into three different electrophysiological subtypes: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), and acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) [9, 10, 11].
Many physicians are unfamiliar about pharyngeal-cervical-brachial variant, which can often be misdiagnosed. Given that our patient is relatively younger than the patients from the majority of the cases in literature, it became important to seek for other possible diagnosis for example: brainstem tumor, neuro-Behçet disease, multiple sclerosis, polymyositis, toxic or metabolic neuropathy, acute encephalomyelitis, Lyme disease, and vascular disease involving the brainstem [7].
The presence of autoantibodies against specific neuronal gangliosides also supports the diagnosis, since there is retrospective study where 68% of patients with PCB tested positive for at least one of the antiganglioside antibodies, especially GT1a IgG antibodies, which are believed to play a pathogenic role in the development of bulbar palsy in PCB, and were found in 51% of the patients [5, 9].
GBS is often preceded by an infectious illness, characteristically upper respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. Several case studies identified Campylobacter jejuni as the microorganism which most frequently triggers this neuropathy. Although, the risk of developing GBS after this infection is rather low, there’s evidence that it is stongly associated with axonal GBS and on rare occasions demyelination can occur [1, 9, 11].
Intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange are the cornerstone of GBS treatment. Impaired bulbar function frequently requires nasogastric feeding and some patients that develope respiratory insufficiency need ventilatory support. Also physical therapy during recovery is crucial to regain strength and movement capacity [12].
Initially, patients progressively worsen for about one or two weeks, reaching a clinical plateau within four weeks. Recovery usually lasts six to 12 months, though it could take as long as three years [12].
GBS diagnosis can be complex due to its rarity and heterogeneous clinical presentation, which can be misleading initially. The early recognition of this disease is important to establish a correct diagnosis, change the prognosis with an adequate early treatment and avoid excessive and unnecessary investigations.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
