A Case of Middle Aged Women with Isolated Left Coronary ostial stenosis with Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/277

A Case of Middle Aged Women with Isolated Left Coronary ostial stenosis with Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

  • Zeine El Abasse 1*
  • Sid Mhamed Ethman 1
  • Ahmed Eba 1

1Department of cardiology, Hospital Center (CNC), Nouakchott, Mauritania.

*Corresponding Author: Zeine El Abasse, Department of cardiology, Hospital Center (CNC), Nouakchott, Mauritania.

Citation: Zeine El Abasse, Sid Mhamed Ethman, Ahmed Eba (2022). A Case of Middle Aged Women with Isolated Left Coronary ostial stenosis with Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 5(9); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/277

Copyright: © 2022 Zeine El Abasse, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 22 August 2022 | Accepted: 19 September 2022 | Published: 30 September 2022

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; percutaneous interventions; isolated left coronary ostial stenosis

Abstract

Background: The stenosis of the ostial left anterior descending artery represents one of the challenges for the interventional cardiologist. In contrast ostial stenosis of the left main trunk shows very good results after percutaneous interventions and implantation of drug-eluting stents. The indications for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of an ostial lesion correspond to the indications for treatment of all other lesions.

Case: A-56-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital who was initially admitted in the intensive care unit for a severe acute chest pain. She had no coronary risk factors. No hormonal disorders were observed. Physical and laboratory examinations revealed that she had not suffered from syphilis or aortitis syndrome or any other inflammatory diseases. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was immediately performed and showed ST segment non elevation in the precordial leads (Figure 1) suggesting an acute anterior ST Non elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). On coronary angiography, a 80% stenosis of the left coronary ostial stenosis was found, but no abnormality was found in other arterial trees. (Figure 2) The patient was diagnosed as having isolated coronary ostial stenosis.

Conclusion: The patients are almost always middle aged woman with no coronary risk factors. , the involved coronary artery is the left main coronary artery, so its obstruction results in a serious condition. Therefore, though its pathogenesis remains to be determined, isolated left coronary ostial stenosis seems to be a distinct clinical entity.

Introduction:

An ostial lesion is defined as a lesion near to the ostium (≤3 mm) and is characterized by a rigid fibrotic texture with pronounced sclerosis associated with a very high tendency to recoil. Under certain circumstances this may lead to a modest primary interventional result accompanied by a higher complication rate and in particular a higher rate of restenosis. Ostial lesions of the left coronary artery in particular represent a greater challenge for percutaneous interventions. We try to determine the characteristics of this clinical entity.

Case presentation:

A-56-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital who was initially admitted in the intensive care unit for a severe acute chest pain. She had no coronary risk factors. No hormonal disorders were observed. Physical and laboratory examinations revealed that she had not suffered from syphilis or aortitis syndrome or any other inflammatory diseases. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was immediately performed and showed ST segment non elevation in the precordial leads (Figure 1) suggesting an acute anterior ST Non elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Echocardiography showed an improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 55%. We initiated anti-thrombotic therapy including aspirin, clopidogrel and curative dose low molecular weight heparin Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneous every 12 hours. On coronary angiography, a 80% stenosis of the left coronary ostial stenosis was found, but no abnormality was found in other arterial trees. (Figure 2) The patient was diagnosed as having isolated coronary ostial stenosis. After having injected risordan intra-coronary we eliminated the spastic origin of this stenosis.  She underwent coronary percutaneous interventions and implementation of drug-eluting stents. She is now completely asymptomatic. 

Figure 1 : coronary angiography, a 80% stenosis of the left coronary ostial stenosis After having injected risordan intra-coronary we eliminated the spastic origin of this stenosis.

Figure 2 : under-shift in the apical-lateral and in the inferior with an over-shift in the avr. 

Discussion:

An ostial lesion is defined as a lesion near to the ostium (≤3 mm) and is characterized by a rigid fibrotic texture with pronounced sclerosis associated with a very high tendency to recoil. Under certain circumstances this may lead to a modest primary interventional result accompanied by a higher complication rate and in particular a higher rate of restenosis. Ostial lesions of the right coronary artery in particular represent a greater challenge for percutaneous interventions with a higher rate of restenosis despite the introduction of various new techniques. In contrast ostial stenosis of the left main trunk shows very good results after percutaneous interventions and implantation of drug-eluting stents. The indications for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of an ostial lesion correspond to the indications for treatment of all other lesions [1].

A review of the literature together with this patient reveals the following characteristics of patients with isolated coronary ostial stenosis. Firstly, the patients are almost always middle aged woman with no coronary risk factors. Secondly, the involved coronary artery is the left main coronary artery, so its obstruction results in a serious condition. Therefore, though its pathogenesis remains to be determined, isolated left coronary ostial stenosis seems to be a distinct clinical entity [2]. this results in a higher re stenosis rate in the treatment of ostial lesions compared with nonostial stenosis. In female patients In addition to coronary sclerosis of the proximal and ostial segments of the coronary vessels may be

Anterior irradiation or inflammatory aortitis (syphilis, Takaysu arteritis) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Acutely, a aortic dissection, either spontaneously or in the course of percutaneous coronary intervention, to a narrowing/displacement of the ostium.

PCI for ostial/mid-shaft lesions, as compared to distal bifurcation lesions in Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA), is associated with better clinical outcomes largely because of the lower need for repeat revascularization in ostial/mid-shaft lesions. [3]

The main immediate complication was acute occlusion of the circumflex artery ostium. After 12 months, the thrombosis and restenosis rates were 5,2% and 6,5%. Predictors of MACE were: Insulin-requiring diabetes(p=0.05), chronic renal failure(p=0.02), a low-pressure stent deployment(p=0.01), or the presence of signs of left ventricular failure (p<10 p=0.01)>

Conclusion:

A review of the literature together with this patient reveals the following characteristics of patients with isolated coronary ostial stenosis. Firstly, the patients are almost always middle aged woman with no coronary risk factors. Secondly, the involved coronary artery is the left main coronary artery, so its obstruction results in a serious condition. Therefore, though its pathogenesis remains to be determined, isolated left coronary ostial stenosis seems to be a distinct clinical entity.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova