Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/838
1 University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Turkey.
2 Demiroğlu Bilim University, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Turkey.
*Corresponding Author: Ege Sinan Torun, Demiroğlu Bilim University, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Turkey.
Citation: Ellada Gasimova, Ege Sinan Torun, (2025), A Case of Antisynthetase Syndrome Causing Critical Digital Ischemia, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 26(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/838
Copyright: © 2025, Ege Sinan Torun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 15 May 2025 | Accepted: 21 May 2025 | Published: 29 May 2025
Keywords: Antisynthetase syndrome; critical digital ischemia; iloprost
Antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) is a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases caused by autoantibodies against aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases. Although the hallmark characteristics of ASS include Raynaud phenomenon, critical digital ischemia and digital ulcers resembling systemic sclerosis are rarely reported in this condition. We hereby report an anti-Jo-1 positive ASS patient syndrome that demonstrated the typical clinical features of myositis, interstitial lung disease, “mechanic’s hand”, Raynaud phenomenon, intermittent fever and inflammatory arthralgia. She was initially treated with methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. During the follow up, she presented with critical digital ischemia causing severe cyanosis and digital ulcers. Upper extremity Doppler ultrasound was normal. Patient was hospitalized and intravenous iloprost infusion and acetylsalicylic acid were initiated. Unfortunately, patient developed a respiratory failure, she was intubated and was admitted to intensive care unit, where she passed away, before the efficacy of iloprost treatment could be assessed. This article also discusses the very limited amount of literature about ASS patients with severe digital ischemia.
Antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) is a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases caused by autoantibodies against aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases. The characteristic features of antisynthetase syndrome include inflammatory myopathy, interstitial lung disease, fever, arthralgia/arthritis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and a thickened, rough skin appearance on the lateral and palmar surfaces of the fingers, known as “mechanic’s hand.” It is more commonly seen in women than in men. The diagnosis of this syndrome is established by demonstrating the presence of antisynthetase autoantibodies, such as anti-Jo-1 in cases with interstitial lung involvement and/or myositis, or anti-threonyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-PL-7 and anti-PL-12) in cases with lung disease [1]. The majority of patients with anti-Jo-1 positive antisynthetase syndrome develops interstitial lung disease. Myositis is associated with significant proximal muscle weakness, affecting more than 90% of cases. Critical digital ischemia is a condition more commonly associated with systemic sclerosis. However, it has also been reported, though rarely, in patients with. antisynthetase syndrome [2]. In this case report, we report an antisynthetase syndrome patient with severe digital ischemia, while discussing the relevant literature on this rare but serious complication.
A 56 years old female patient presented to the internal medicine outpatient clinic with complaints of muscle weakness, fatigue, and an unintentional weight loss of 10 kg over the past two months. Laboratory tests revealed elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels (2700 U/L), prompting hospitalization for further evaluation. Physical examination showed “mechanic’s hands” in both hands and proximal muscle weakness in both upper and lower extremities. Electromyography (EMG) demonstrated myogenic involvement in proximal muscles, leading to a muscle biopsy from the deltoid muscle. The pathology report confirmed findings consistent with inflammatory myopathy. Laboratory tests were negative for antinuclear antibody (ANA) but positive for anti-Jo-1 in the extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) panel. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) revealed a bilateral ground-glass appearance consistent with interstitial lung disease. Upon further history taking, the patient reported intermittent fever, Raynaud’s phenomenon, and arthralgias, leading to the diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome. The patient was initially treated with a three-day course of intravenous pulse methylprednisolone, followed by oral prednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg (patient was 40 kg). During follow-up, muscle strength improved, and creatine kinase levels declined. The steroid dose was gradually tapered, and the patient was discharged on oral prednisolone. Two weeks after initiating steroid therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg, twice in the morning and once in the evening) was added to the treatment regimen as a steroid sparing agent. Mycophenolate mofetil was selected due to its beneficial effects in myositis patients with interstitial lung disease. During an outpatient follow-up visit, severe cyanosis and digital ulcers developed at the fingertips of both upper extremities, prompting rehospitalization. Antiphospholipid antibodies were negative and bilateral upper extremity arterial Doppler ultrasound was normal. Due to the development of critical digital ischemia, the patient was started on acetylsalicylic acid and intravenous iloprost infusion. However, during this hospital stay, respiratory failure developed, necessitating an intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mechanical ventilation. Despite treatment, the patient’s condition deteriorated, and she passed away in the ICU. Consequently, long-term follow-up and assessment of the response to digital ischemia treatment could not be conducted.
The presence of typical clinical symptoms and positive anti-Jo-1 antibodies led to the diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome in this patient. This case demonstrates that critical digital ischemia can occur in the course of antisynthetase syndrome, similar to systemic sclerosis, for which intravenous iloprost treatment was initiated. Early diagnosis and effective management of digital ulcers may prevent complications such as gangrene and amputation. In patients presenting with critical ischemia, including digital ulcers and gangrene, the antisynthetase syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis, alongside systemic sclerosis.
Since digital ischemia is not as frequently observed in antisynthetase syndrome, there is very limited amount of literature on the subject which consists of case reports and case series. Medline research using keywords “antisynthetase syndrome” and “ischemia” revealed only a total of 22 antisynthetase syndromes with 6 patients that are anti-Jo-1 positive [2-6]. In their systematic literature review concerning severe digital ischemia in patients with antisynthetase antibody positivity, Yoshida et al identified 12 antisynthetase-positive patients with severe digital ischemia from one case series and eight case reports. In addition they reported severe digital ischemia in 7 of their 100 ASS patients. Clinical features associated with severe digital ischemia in antisynthetase-positive patients included Raynaud’s phenomenon, digital pitting scars, and nailfold capillary abnormalities. Outcomes of severe digital ischemia were generally favorable with vasodilators [6]. Our patient had Raynaud phenomenon but lacked digital pitting scars. We were unable to perform nailfold capilleroscopy to our patient. Response to vasodilators could not be assessed due to the deterioration in her respiratory function.
Due to its rarity, the treatment approach for critical digital ischemia in antisynthetase syndrome is typically based on the management strategies used in systemic sclerosis, in addition to immunosuppression/ immunomodulation (with agents including but not limited to glucocorticoids, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin). Xynogalas et al report critical digital ischemia in an anti Jo-1 positive antisynthetase syndrome patient that responded to treatment with a combination of immunosuppression by high dose glucocorticoids, rituximab, low molecular weight heparin, intravenous iloprost and acetylsalicylic acid [3]. Yehudina et al reported a 33 year old female ASS patient that was anti-Jo-1 whose digital ischemia did not adequately respond to many treatment modalities including immunosuppressives (methylprednisolone, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide) and vasodilators (including nifedipine, intravenous vasoprostane, intravenous iloprost, doxazosin, sildenafil) and antiaggregant (clopidogrel), which stabilied with repeated monthly intravenous immunoglobulin infusions and then further improved with rituximab [5]. Our patient was already under potent immunosuppressive treatment with methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil for muscle and lung involvement of antisynthetase syndrome. When critical digital ischemia developed, we initiated vasodilator treatment with intravenous iloprost and antiaggregant treatment with acetylsalicylic acid.
In conclusion, critical digital ischemia resembling systemic sclerosis may develop isn ASS patients, which may necessitate intravenous vasodilator treatment in addition to immunosuppressive treatment. Early diagnosis of this potentially devastating condition and prompt, effective treatment can reduce the risk of necrosis and auto-amputation associated with critical digital ischemia, thereby decreasing morbidity in these patients.
None.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,