Editorial Note | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-8975/013
1 Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology of Forensic Science and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Jordan
*Corresponding Author: Ahed J Alkhatib, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology of Forensic Science and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
Citation: Ahed J Alkhatib, New Insights of Diabetes: is it Rational to Initiate Insulin Treatment for Diabetes Type 2 Patients. J Diabetes and Islet Biology 2(1) Doi: 10.31579/2641-8975/013
Copyright: © 2019 Ahed J Alkhatib This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 September 2019 | Accepted: 19 September 2019 | Published: 23 September 2019
Keywords: Keywords
Diabetes type 2 is considered one of the most common chronic and non-infectious diseases that ranks third following cardiovascular diseases and cancer.
Diabetes type 2 is considered one of the most common chronic and non-infectious diseases that ranks third following cardiovascular diseases and cancer. It has complications that make risks for health of persons and associated with economic burden for individual and community levels [2,4,,5,6].
I think that there is a philosophical problem in diabetic knowledge affecting its treatment. Type 2 diabetes is defined " a group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both [1].
The philosophical approaches in taking diabetes as special entity seems to underestimate the reality of the topic. It has been used to define diabetes and identify diabetic patients based on glucose level (the indirect path of diabetes) rather than measuring insulin level (the direct path of diabetes).
We wanted to test a new hypothesis in which insulin measurement reflects new insights to diabetes. We analyzed two data sets based on Kaggle website. One dataset was from India, and the other data was from Frankfurt Hospital (Germany). Approximately 2800 subjects were included. We divided subjects into three groups: normal, pre-diabetic, and diabetics.
It was interestingly found that both glucose level and insulin level were increased together overall study groups. The mean glucose levels were in the following patterns: normal group (92.41 mg/dl), pre-diabetic group (118.05 mg/dl), and diabetic group (153.04 mg/dl) (table 1, figure 1).
According to this context, we think that it is better to reduce both glucose and insulin levels instead of initiating insulin treatment.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
