AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/215
1Universidad del Estado, Huehuetoca, México
2Universidad de la Salud, CDMX, México
3Universidad de Sonora, Navojoa, México
4Universidad Autónoma Latina, Colombia
*Corresponding Author: Cruz García Lirios, Riggs Pharmaceuticals, Department of Pharmacy, University of Karachi.
Citation: Cruz G. Lirios, Oscar C. Rincón, María Del Rosario Molina González, Blannes Ugarte AV, Eyder B. Mojica, (2024), Hypertension in Acute Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Ischaemic Stroke: When and When not to Treat., Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 6(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/215
Copyright: © 2024, Cruz García Lirios. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 May 2024 | Accepted: 05 June 2024 | Published: 14 June 2024
Keywords: Governance; safety; retrofitting; testing; adjustment
Often, social rehabilitation has been considered as a security policy that distinguishes the post-bureaucratic State from its predecessor, considering that crime is inherent in learning that, if reversed, could result in rehabilitation, pre-release and reintegration of private individuals. of his freedom. In this regard, the objective of this paper was to specify a model for the study of social readaptation expectations, considering them a central axis of the punitive strategy. A non-experimental work was carried out with a non-probabilistic sample selection of 100 inmates, considering their confinement in a penitentiary system of training for early release in different modalities and instances. From a structural model ⌠X 2 = 445.34 (44df) p = 0.007; GFI = 0.990; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.008⌡ only 34% of the total variance of the construct was explained, which suggests the exploration of more indicators and their correlation with other variables alluding to the prevention of crime or the promotion of violence-free relations.
The objective of this work is the specification of a model of dependency relationships between the variables that the state of knowledge has associated with respect to public policies, penitentiary services and expectations of inmates deprived of their liberty. In this context, the reliability and validity of an instrument that measured expectations of social rehabilitation in prisons in central Mexico was established. The article is part of the discipline of Social Work, an area of security studies, but includes concepts derived from cognitive psychology such as expectations and from the sociology of violence such as risks [7]. In this way, the notion of expectations is linked to the perception of risks since its gestation is assumed in a scenario of uncertainty where decision-making is made based on the possible benefits without considering the probabilities of risk [11]. Prospective decision theory considers expectations as determinants of risk decisions. This is the case of those who prefer to risk losing their profits by considering low risks instead of ensuring a minimum profit [11]. This is how social readaptation will be considered by the theory of prospective decisions as a scenario of minimal gains since: 1) it entails minimal risks when following an addiction rehabilitation protocol that does not correspond to great benefits such as the freedom to commit a crime.; 2) implies a minimum safe gain crystallized in freedom in the long term or in the medium term if it is anticipated, but insignificant compared to impunity or collusion to continue committing crimes [11]. In such a context of social readaptation based on prospective decisions, institutional security actors and inmates deprived of their liberty consolidate a punitive system of administration of justice [11]. This is a scenario in which social readaptation is directed towards governance. That is, the differences between rulers and the governed tend to dilute to the extent that citizens are participatory, orienting themselves towards the co-management of early release and social reintegration [2]. Precisely, studies related to social rehabilitation place it as a mediating factor between civil security demands and state justice enforcement instruments [7]. Such a relationship can be inferred and established from the expectations of its actors. In this sense, inmates deprived of their liberty, security guards and administrative technicians share representations of security that are oriented towards readaptation indicated by adherence to the treatment of diseases, rehabilitation for addictions, job training, early release. and social reintegration [5]. It is these representations that generate expectations of aversion or propensity to the social readaptation system [12]. Studies on the subject warn that the relationship between security administration and the expectations of its actors is mediated by factors such as arbitration or conciliation, as well as determined by peace management.
Formulation: Will the theoretical and empirical frameworks reviewed in the literature explain the expectations of social readaptation of a penitentiary in central Mexico?
Hypothesis: The theory of prospective decisions and the findings reported in the literature suggest that social readaptation is the product of conflict mediation, arbitration of differences and conciliatory negotiation in which expectations reflect, explain and anticipate possible scenarios. management and/or administration of violence or pacification [19]. The specification of social readaptation in the study penitentiary suggests the inclusion of other factors not included in the literature, such as early release or social reintegration, which would reliably explain the generality and particularity of social readaptation in a state institution.
In the first study, a review of the literature was carried out with the purpose of establishing the central themes of the social rehabilitation agenda and its effects on the availability of resources and management of penitentiary services. In relation to the cited literature, there are lines of research related to helplessness and farsightedness as explanatory factors of the impact of rehabilitation and addiction treatment on the users' dispositions regarding human rights, early release and labor reintegration. In the second study, a non-experimental, cross-sectional and exploratory study was carried out. A non-probabilistic selection of 100 inmates from the Social Rehabilitation Center (Cevareso) was carried out. The Carreon Social Readaptation Expectations Scale (2016) was used, which includes eight items related to negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration regarding addiction treatment, early release and labor reintegration. The Delphi technique was used to homogenize the meanings of the words included in the items. Inmates were surveyed at the Cevareso facilities, social work area, with prior written guarantee of confidentiality and anonymity, as well as information concerning the null effect of the responses on the inmate's prison status. The information was processed in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPPSS version 14). Measures of central tendency and dispersion, reliability and validity were estimated with the parameters of Crombach 's Alpha, Kayser Meyer Olkin , Barttlet test, chi square, goodness of fit and residual.
The statistical properties of the instrument in which it is possible to observe a normal distribution (Mardia: 31), followed by adecuation to sample (KMO = 0.500) (see Table 1). Include sufficient internal consistency (Croanbach’s alpha with 0.783), but with a moderate percentage of the total variance explained.
| Table 1. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MSA | |||
| Overall MSA | 0.500 | ||
| r1 | 0.500 | ||
| r2 | 0.500 | ||
| r3 | 0.500 | ||
| r4 | 0.500 | ||
| r5 | 0.500 | ||
| r6 | 0.500 | ||
| r7 | 0.500 | ||
| r8 | 0.500 | ||
| r9 | 0.500 | ||
| r10 | 0.500 | ||
| r11 | 0.500 | ||
| r12 | 0.500 | ||
| r13 | 0.500 | ||
| r14 | 0.500 | ||
| r15 | 0.500 | ||
| r16 | 0.500 | ||
| r17 | 0.500 | ||
| r18 | 0.500 | ||
| r19 | 0.500 | ||
| r20 | 0.500 | ||
| r21 | 0.500 | ||
| r22 | 0.500 | ||
| r23 | 0.500 | ||
| r24 | 0.500 | ||
| r25 | 0.500 | ||
| r26 | 0.500 | ||
| r27 | 0.500 | ||
| r28 | 0.500 | ||
| r29 | 0.500 | ||
| r30 | 0.500 | ||
| r31 | 0.500 | ||
| r32 | 0.500 | ||
| r33 | 0.500 | ||
| r34 | 0.500 | ||
| r35 | 0.500 | ||
| r36 | 0.500 | ||
| r37 | 0.500 | ||
| r38 | 0.500 | ||
| r39 | 0.500 | ||
| r40 | 0.500 | ||
Six factors were established, its factor structure was estimated, considering the trajectories of dependency relationships between the factor and the indicators. First factor include the items 25, 34, 11, 5, 9, 8, 10, 6 and 39.
| Table 2. Factor Loadings | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | Uniqueness | |||||||||
| r3 | -0.848 | 0.079 | |||||||||||||
| r25 | 0.842 | -0.462 | 0.056 | ||||||||||||
| r34 | 0.842 | -0.462 | 0.056 | ||||||||||||
| r4 | -0.821 | 0.219 | |||||||||||||
| r13 | -0.772 | 0.317 | |||||||||||||
| r11 | 0.769 | 0.204 | |||||||||||||
| r5 | 0.765 | 0.263 | |||||||||||||
| r20 | -0.749 | 0.356 | |||||||||||||
| r30 | -0.719 | 0.293 | |||||||||||||
| r21 | -0.719 | 0.293 | |||||||||||||
| r1 | -0.715 | -0.468 | 0.231 | ||||||||||||
| r14 | -0.654 | 0.277 | |||||||||||||
| r9 | 0.609 | 0.598 | 0.076 | ||||||||||||
| r8 | 0.579 | -0.505 | 0.083 | ||||||||||||
| r10 | 0.560 | -0.623 | 0.080 | ||||||||||||
| r6 | 0.448 | -0.467 | 0.200 | ||||||||||||
| r39 | 0.443 | 0.654 | 0.402 | 0.087 | |||||||||||
| r7 | 0.829 | 0.408 | 0.301 | ||||||||||||
| r31 | 0.828 | 0.184 | |||||||||||||
| r22 | 0.828 | 0.184 | |||||||||||||
| r16 | -0.794 | 0.320 | |||||||||||||
| r40 | 0.740 | 0.270 | |||||||||||||
| r18 | -0.580 | 0.186 | |||||||||||||
| r17 | -0.464 | 0.227 | |||||||||||||
| r15 | 0.410 | 0.337 | |||||||||||||
| r28 | 0.941 | 0.096 | |||||||||||||
| r37 | 0.941 | 0.096 | |||||||||||||
| r2 | -0.707 | -0.427 | 0.233 | ||||||||||||
| r36 | 0.638 | 0.381 | |||||||||||||
| r27 | 0.638 | 0.381 | |||||||||||||
| r35 | 1.009 | 0.028 | |||||||||||||
| r26 | 1.009 | 0.028 | |||||||||||||
| r19 | 0.778 | 0.119 | |||||||||||||
| r23 | 0.951 | 0.140 | |||||||||||||
| r32 | 0.951 | 0.140 | |||||||||||||
| r29 | 0.762 | 0.296 | |||||||||||||
| r38 | 0.543 | 0.564 | |||||||||||||
| r33 | 0.884 | 0.125 | |||||||||||||
| r24 | 0.884 | 0.125 | |||||||||||||
| r12 | 0.749 | 0.438 | |||||||||||||
| Note. Applied rotation method is promax. | |||||||||||||||
Extraction method: main axes, promax rotation. Adequacy and sphericity ⌠X 2 = 34.21 (32df) p = 0.000; KMO = 0.703. Principal factor (25% of the total variance explained), second factor (27% total variance explained) and third factor (12% total variance explained). All factor 65% total variance explained (see Table 3).
| Table 3. Factor Characteristics | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrotated solution | Rotated solution | ||||||||||||||
| Eigenvalues | SumSq. Loadings | Proportion var. | Cumulative | SumSq. Loadings | Proportion var. | Cumulative | |||||||||
| Factor 1 | 10.270 | 10.086 | 0.252 | 0.252 | 9.205 | 0.230 | 0.230 | ||||||||
| Factor 2 | 7.219 | 7.028 | 0.176 | 0.428 | 6.090 | 0.152 | 0.382 | ||||||||
| Factor 3 | 5.217 | 5.044 | 0.126 | 0.554 | 5.039 | 0.126 | 0.508 | ||||||||
| Factor 4 | 4.275 | 4.045 | 0.101 | 0.655 | 3.992 | 0.100 | 0.608 | ||||||||
| Factor 5 | 3.649 | 3.436 | 0.086 | 0.741 | 3.988 | 0.100 | 0.708 | ||||||||
| Factor 6 | 2.181 | 1.991 | 0.050 | 0.791 | 3.317 | 0.083 | 0.791 | ||||||||
The model includes direct, positive and significant relationships between the social readaptation expectations factors. Six factors established in the exploratory factor analysis of principal axes with promax rotation (see Table 4).
| Table 4. Factor Correlations | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | ||||||||
| Factor 1 | 1.000 | 0.068 | 0.021 | -0.198 | 0.187 | 0.045 | |||||||
| Factor 2 | 0.068 | 1.000 | 0.200 | -0.047 | -0.208 | -0.203 | |||||||
| Factor 3 | 0.021 | 0.200 | 1.000 | 0.193 | -0.260 | -0.088 | |||||||
| Factor 4 | -0.198 | -0.047 | 0.193 | 1.000 | 0.009 | -0.293 | |||||||
| Factor 5 | 0.187 | -0.208 | -0.260 | 0.009 | 1.000 | 0.123 | |||||||
| Factor 6 | 0.045 | -0.203 | -0.088 | -0.293 | 0.123 | 1.000 | |||||||
The adjustment and residual parameters ⌠X 2 = 445.34 (44df) p = 0.007; GFI = 0.990; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.008⌡suggest the acceptance of the null hypothesis which indicates a correspondence between the theoretical explanations and the empirical demonstrations with respect to the observations made in the present work. Parallel analysis suggest six factors, perhaps only four to requirements more than 1% total variance explained (see Table 5).
| Table 5. Parallel Analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real data component eigenvalues | Simulated data mean eigenvalues | ||||
| Factor 1* | 10.270 | 2.488 | |||
| Factor 2* | 7.219 | 2.266 | |||
| Factor 3* | 5.217 | 2.110 | |||
| Factor 4* | 4.275 | 2.013 | |||
| Factor 5* | 3.649 | 1.902 | |||
| Factor 6* | 2.181 | 1.807 | |||
| Factor 7 | 1.610 | 1.720 | |||
| Factor 8 | 0.952 | 1.626 | |||
| Factor 9 | 0.762 | 1.551 | |||
| Factor 10 | 0.652 | 1.481 | |||
| Factor 11 | 0.456 | 1.413 | |||
| Factor 12 | 0.423 | 1.349 | |||
| Factor 13 | 0.355 | 1.296 | |||
| Factor 14 | 0.282 | 1.226 | |||
| Factor 15 | 0.221 | 1.159 | |||
| Factor 16 | 0.214 | 1.101 | |||
| Factor 17 | 0.186 | 1.047 | |||
| Factor 18 | 0.174 | 0.990 | |||
| Factor 19 | 0.150 | 0.939 | |||
| Factor 20 | 0.133 | 0.894 | |||
| Factor 21 | 0.118 | 0.847 | |||
| Factor 22 | 0.093 | 0.798 | |||
| Factor 23 | 0.070 | 0.762 | |||
| Factor 24 | 0.067 | 0.711 | |||
| Factor 25 | 0.060 | 0.666 | |||
| Factor 26 | 0.053 | 0.631 | |||
| Factor 27 | 0.040 | 0.593 | |||
| Factor 28 | 0.036 | 0.557 | |||
| Factor 29 | 0.029 | 0.520 | |||
| Factor 30 | 0.023 | 0.488 | |||
| Factor 31 | 0.018 | 0.456 | |||
| Factor 32 | 0.013 | 0.418 | |||
| Factor 33 | 0.000 | 0.387 | |||
| Factor 34 | 0.000 | 0.351 | |||
| Factor 35 | 0.000 | 0.321 | |||
| Factor 36 | 0.000 | 0.285 | |||
| Factor 37 | -0.000 | 0.254 | |||
| Factor 38 | -0.000 | 0.224 | |||
| Factor 39 | -0.000 | 0.193 | |||
| Factor 40 | -0.000 | 0.161 | |||
| Note. '*' = Factor should be retained. Results from PC-based parallel analysis. | |||||
The contribution of this work to the state of the art lies in the specification of a model for the study of expectations of social readaptation in inmates of a penitentiary in central Mexico, but the type of non-experimental study and the type of sample selection are not Probabilistic analysis limits the results of the work to the study sample, as well as the type of exploratory analysis and the percentage of the total variance explained suggest the inclusion of other indicators related to domiciliary freedom or pre-release regulated by an identifier. The role of the media in the rehabilitation of people in prisons has been a topic of interest in recent literature [17]. The importance of the media in the reintegration of people deprived of liberty is analyzed, highlighting its dual function as a tool for reintegration efforts, access to information and entertainment, as well as a source of truthful and objective information about internal realities. penitentiary institutions [18]. This reflects the legal framework for the comprehensive rehabilitation of convicted persons [14]. The transformation of correctional institutions into rehabilitation centers has been a focus of attention [15]. This shift toward rehabilitation is also evident in the systematic review of literature on alternative offender rehabilitation programs, such as yoga, mindfulness, and meditation in prison, which have shown promising results in promoting rehabilitation [9]. Rehabilitation programs within prisons play a crucial role in reintegrating people into society [10]. Effective prison rehabilitation programs, including education and substance use disorder treatment, have been shown to be beneficial when well designed and implemented [13]. Additionally, they provide unique learning experiences for both incarcerated individuals and day students, promoting education and rehabilitation [3]. Additionally, specialized programs such as gang rehabilitation aim to help people abandon their gang affiliation through religious interventions and tattoo removal services [16]. In conclusion, the literature on rehabilitation in prisons highlights the importance of media, personalized programs and alternative approaches to promote the reintegration of individuals into society. These efforts reflect a shift toward rehabilitation-focused initiatives in correctional systems, emphasizing the need for comprehensive and effective rehabilitation programs to support individuals on their path to successful reintegration.
Pre-release programs and strategies even though it has been shown that crime prevention is less costly, formative and indicative, but in the present work it has been found that the percentage of the explained variance could increase with the correlation between crime prevention and the promotion of violence-free relationships with respect to early release and social reintegration. However, some other studies affirm that social readaptation would also be influenced by civil distrust of the authorities regarding their level of corruption, nepotism, opacity, negligence, extortion or collusion with organized crime, as well as the perception that Social rehabilitation institutes are trainers of crime. In the present work, it has been observed that the expectations of social readaptation are not only based on rehabilitation, pre-release and reintegration, but also a high percentage of unexplained variance is evident that could be explained by variables such as expectations of corruption, including crimes such as negligence, opacity, nepotism, extortion or collusion.It is necessary to contrast the specified model in contexts, scenarios and samples related to public security and institutions to adjust their dependency relationships and calibrate possible correlations with other factors and indicators limited to the institutional phenomenon of social readaptation, in this case. framework understood as a public security administration strategy whose effects are observed in the expectations of inmates, but also in the expectations of administrative and security technicians. The extension of the study to samples of administrative and security technicians would contribute to the study of social rehabilitation as a distinctive institutional seal of the governing State in charge of the procurement and administration of justice rather than crime prevention and the promotion of relationships free of violence.
The objective of this work was to specify a model of trajectories of dependency relationships between the social readaptation expectations factor with respect to indicators related to rehabilitation, pre -release and social reintegration, although the percentage of total variance explained warns of the inclusion of other indicators that could link the construct with other variables such as civil distrust towards authorities and perceptions of risk around corruption. In this sense, it is advisable to contrast the model to calibrate some correlations between the factors and indicators.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
