Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/206
1Internal Medicine Department Hepatology and Gastroenterology unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
2Plastic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
3Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
4Specialist neuropsychiatry Faculty of medicine capital university.
5Freelance Dentist.
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed N., Internal Medicine Department Hepatology and Gastroenterology unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University.
Citation: Ahmed N., ElFahar M., Elboraie H., Saleh E., Elsaied H, (2026), Psychiatry: A Hidden Fortress of Diseases, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 7(3); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/206
Copyright: © 2026, Ahmed N. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 15 June 2026 | Accepted: 26 June 2026 | Published: 30 June 2026
Keywords: psychiatry; psychological; diseases; surgical and mental
The prevalence and impact of psychiatric conditions in patients with internal dis-eases represent a complex and significant aspect of healthcare. Understanding the inter-play between physical and mental health is essential for providing comprehensive and effective patient care. Our aim is to show the new generations that Psychiatry deserves respect and awareness of importance, also demonstrates that it’s a hidden fortress of diseases.
The prevalence and impact of psychiatric conditions in patients with internal dis-eases represent a complex and significant aspect of healthcare. Understanding the inter-play between physical and mental health is essential for providing comprehensive and effective patient care.[1]
Viewpoints:
Addressing mental health in surgical care cannot be overstated as growing recognition of its impact on recovery and surgical outcomes, integrating psychological support into standard surgical practice should be a priority. This innovative approach offers a holistic model for patient care that can be applied to a variety of surgical fields.
Surgery involves significant physical and emotional stress. The psychological burden of surgery can be categorized into:
37% of surgical patients experience moderate to severe anxiety before their procedures, which can negatively affect their recovery, 23% of patients report experiencing depressive symptoms post-surgery, which complicates the healing process and increases the risk of surgical complications. [2] Evidence indicates that insulin is a pleiotropic peptide, critical to neurotrophism, neuroplasticity, and neuromodulation. Moreover, the role of insulin underscores its importance in the development of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including, but not limited to, mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis and progression towards diabetes, obesity, and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease. Insulin has effects on normal and abnormal brain function hence targeting insulin-related pathways in the brain may emerge as a new approach for refining treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.[3] Chronic psychological stress (CPS) manifests as sustained dysregulation arising from prolonged adaptive responses to chronic endogenous and exogenous stimuli. Clinical evidence indicates that CPS markedly influences cancer progression, with most oncology patients developing detectable stress-related psychological disorders during disease management, CPS compromises immune surveillance through neuroendocrine-mediated hormonal dysregulation, impairing malignant cell recognition and clearance. So, CPS hormones promote tumor metabolic adaptation via hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis-driven metabolic reprogramming, enhancing glycolytic flux to support uncontrolled proliferation. CPS accelerates tumor progression through reactive oxygen species-induced mitochondrial impairment, DNA damage accumulation, and inflammatory cascades. Notably, CPS induces gut microbiota perturbations that reciprocally amplify tumorigenic processes through microbial metabolite disturbances and neuroimmune crosstalk, creating a self-perpetuating pathogenic loop. Therapeutic strategies to address cancer-related CPS that encompass pharmacological agents targeting neuroendocrine pathways, psychosomatic behavioral interventions, social environment adjustments, and evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine formulations demonstrate potential in cancer prevention, treatment, and outcome optimization. However, challenges remain in achieving precise neuromodulation and minimizing intervention side effects, underscoring the need for mechanism-guided therapeutic innovations.[4] Future work concerning the relationship between psychiatric disorder and functional somatic syndromes must be considered alongside the same relationship with general medical disorders, in which depression may accompany the disorder without necessarily being a causal factor. This should help avoid premature conclusions that psychiatric disorder is a principal factor causing the functional somatic syndromes. Also, we should be aware of possible interactions between psychiatric disorders and other behavioural and metabolic variables to identify the role of anxiety and depression in causing the functional somatic syndrome.[5] Mental disorders of all kinds are associated with an increased risk of onset of a wide range of chronic physical conditions. Current efforts to improve the physical health of individuals with mental disorders may be too narrowly focused on the small group with the most severe mental disorders. Interventions aimed at the primary prevention of chronic physical diseases should optimally be integrated into treatment of all mental disorders in primary and secondary care from early in the disorder course. Co-occurrence of mental and general medical disorders is among the most common and disabling combinations, with approximately 30% of individuals with comorbidity having both a mental and a physical disorder. Other related problems such as substance abuse disorders and social disadvantage can both contribute to comorbidity and exacerbate its effect. What causes these high rates of mental and physical comorbidities? the temporal relationship between mental disorders and incident physical disorders suggests that mental disorders may precipitate the onset of physical conditions. Mental health disorders may cause physiological stress, which can directly result in general medical disorders, or they may indirectly lead to physical disorders through unhealthful habits or reduced access to medical services. Other studies have found that many general medical conditions are also important risk factors for mental health disorders. For example, patients with diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma have an increased risk of developing depression. Additionally, poverty and adverse life events are risk factors for both mental and medical conditions in adults. This relationship may be mediated by biological mechanisms (eg, elevated inflammation and heightened stress response) as well as adverse health behaviors (eg, poor diet, inactivity, and substance use)The growing recognition of the need to better integrate public health and clinical models for improving health has particular relevance for clinicians. Addressing comorbidity will include population-based approaches to minimize the new onset of the conditions (1ry prevention), support early detection in high-risk populations (2ry prevention), and implement effective treatment to minimize burden once conditions have developed (tertiary prevention).To prevent the onset of chronic physical conditions among people with mental disorders, clinicians can engage patients in programs, such as those focusing on physical activity, nutrition, and smoking cessation, that will allow patients to gain skills for managing their health. To address broader social factors that contribute to comorbidity, clinicians can aid patients by connecting them with resources, such as assistance with food or housing. 3ry Prevention entails minimizing disability for patients once they have developed chronic conditions. For patients with comorbidity, optimizing function and quality of life is usually a higher priority than an exclusive focus on managing symptoms and normalizing laboratory values, For instance, patients with depression and diabetes are typically less concerned with their HbA1c levels than with their ability to maintain a job and social relationships in the face of the burden posed by both conditions. Clinicians can initiate discussions with patients about priorities for their overall quality of life and how self-management of their conditions can support those priorities. Comorbidity is a public health problem that demands public health solutions. The study by Scott et al suggests the need for continuing research to better disentangle the complex relationships between mental disorders, chronic physical conditions, and the common risk factors underlying both. In turn, efforts to blend public health and clinical models will be important for preventing and addressing the well-being of individuals with comorbid conditions. [6]
The elevated risk of poor physical health in patients with mental disorders, as well as the risk of mental disorders in people with chronic medical conditions, makes early detection through screening a high priority for these patients. For screening to be effective, however, it needs to be coupled with a plan for treating newly diagnosed conditions. Treatment for comorbidities should involve coordination and collaboration between clinicians to ensure high-quality care for all of the patients’ conditions. Effective coordination strategies include shared patient records, communication between clinicians, and care management to follow up with patients and monitor their progress. [6] The new generations must know that Psychiatry deserves respect and awareness of importance, Eventually, it’s a hidden fortress of diseases.
Thanks to any one helps to convey our message to the public.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,