AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/445
University Hospital “Shefqet Ndroqi” Tirana, Albania.
*Corresponding Author: Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi FCCP, University of Medicine Tirana. Albania.
Citation: Perlat Kapisyzi, Silva Tafai, Olvis Petre, Ornela Nuredini, Loreta Karaulli, et al., (2024), Lung Ultrasound: Breaking Free from Artifact Labels and Misnomers, J Clinical Research and Reports, 17(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/445
Copyright: © 2024, Perlat Kapisyzi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 November 2024 | Accepted: 04 December 2024 | Published: 09 December 2024
Keywords: lung ultrasound; artifacts; healthy bat sign; sick bat sign; twinkling white area
Background
Lung ultrasound (LU) has now become an indispensable diagnostic tool, fulfilling his prediction. However, outdated concepts and terminologies in LU interpretation require reevaluation to align with current clinical knowledge.
Aim of Study
The study aims to modernize lung ultrasound (LU) interpretation by transitioning from artifact-based terminologies, such as A-lines and B-lines, to nomenclature that emphasizes anatomical and clinical significance. This approach seeks to enhance diagnostic precision and utility in critical care and respiratory medicine.
Method
After CT examination a review and reinterpretation of LU findings were performed, integrating insights from over 600 patient ultrasound examinations. The study redefined common terminologies like A-lines, B-lines, and C-lines based on their anatomical origins and clinical relevance. A novel diagnostic framework—Merlin’s space, including the Healthy and Sick Bat Signs—was introduced to differentiate normal from pathological lung conditions.
Results
Conclusions
This study advocates for a paradigm shift in LU interpretation, focusing on anatomical and clinical findings rather than artifact-based descriptions. By adopting descriptive and pathology-oriented nomenclature, clinicians can improve diagnostic accuracy and make timely, informed decisions. The proposed framework—incorporating the Healthy and Sick Bat Signs—offers a practical, radiation-sparing alternative to traditional imaging methods, aligning LU practice with modern medical standards. This distinct approach to pulmonary ultrasound interpretation draws upon the groundbreaking work of Prof. Daniel Lichtenstein and the efforts of all who have championed the value of this examination. While this paradigm shift may not be immediately embraced, the article trusts in the ethical understanding of its audience and draws inspiration from the wisdom of Charles Sidney Burwell:
“Half of what we are going to teach you is wrong, and half of it is right. Our problem is that we don't know which half is which.”
In 2009, Daniel Lichtenstein highlighted that it typically takes 15–20 years for new medical concepts to overcome established opinions and achieve widespread acceptance. Today, lung ultrasound (LU) has indeed become an indispensable diagnostic tool, confirming Lichtenstein’s prediction [1]. However, as more than two decades have passed, some concepts and terminologies in LU interpretation have become outdated, necessitating a critical reevaluation to align with current knowledge and practices.
After CT examination of the patients, a review and reinterpretation of LU findings were performed, integrating insights from over 600 patient ultrasound examinations. The study redefined common terminologies like A-lines, B-lines, and C-lines based on their anatomical origins and clinical relevance. These ultrasound examinations are performed by handheld Clarius scan, mode – lung. A novel diagnostic framework—Merlin’s space, including the Healthy and Sick Bat Signs—was introduced to differentiate normal from pathological lung conditions.
Artifacts vs. Anatomical Reality
An artifact in medical imaging is defined as a feature that does not correspond to the physical properties of the subject being imaged. While this concept has been historically applied to lung ultrasound findings like A-lines and B-lines [2], such classifications often fail to capture the clinical and anatomical realities these patterns represent.
The Problem with Artifact Labels:
Labeling findings as artifacts focuses on the technical processes behind their creation rather than their clinical or anatomical significance.
This approach risks overshadowing the diagnostic value of LU patterns, particularly when these patterns directly reflect underlying pathology.
Reevaluating Lung Ultrasound Nomenclature
A-Lines:
Traditionally considered an artifact, [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] the A-lines are horizontal streaky hyper echoic densities that occur equidistant from the pleural lines due to the interface between air and tissue(pleura). While often seen in healthy lung aeration, horizontal streaky hyper echoic density (not A- profile) also appear in pathological conditions such as:
Lung abscesses
Hydropneumothorax
Infected bullae
And echinococcus cyst. [Figure 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]
Rather than dismissing A-lines as artifacts, they should be understood as anatomic reflections of the air-tissue interface. This distinction underscores their diagnostic significance. (Not rarely, horizontal streaky hyper echoic densities simulate A-line, or A-line does not repeat itself in the depth of the twinkling white zone)
B-Lines:
B-lines are vertical, hyper-echoic streaks extending from the pleura up to the end of the screen and have traditionally been labeled as artifacts [13]. However, they are caused by tissue impedance mismatches due to interstitial fluid, such as in: Pulmonary edema Interstitial syndromes [13].
By emphasizing their anatomical origins, B-lines can be redefined in terms of their clinical relevance, providing critical insights into lung pathology
The number of B-lines, according to Lichtenstein, indicates the degree of inflammation. Three to four B-lines, referred to as a "septal rocket," originate from the subpleural tissue and interlobular septa. Meanwhile, five to ten B-lines, termed a "ground-glass rocket," correspond to ground-glass lesions.[14]
Sometimes after I failed, I din’t find a colleague to be able to number the B- lines because of waterfall sign (homogeneous white hyper-echoic zone). [Fig 9,10,11,12,13]
Based on our experience with ultrasound examinations of over 600 patients, we have observed that the number of B-lines depends not only on the involvement of lobular structures but also on the extent of inflammation along the subpleural and interlobular spaces. The presence of more than three B-lines that do not cause a "positive silhouette sign" with the borders of twinkling white area indicates that the inflammation has not widely spread to the intralobular structures.
When the borders of the twinkling white area are obscured by a cluster of B-lines, resulting in a "positive silhouette sign," regardless of their number, this is a definitive indicator of the ground-glass pattern of pulmonary injury. The typical presentation of advanced ground-glass pattern is the ultrasound "waterfall sign," characterized by such a high number and intensity of B-lines that they merge into a homogeneous, hyper-echoic white zone starting at the pleural line and expanding downward toward the bottom of the screen. [Fig 10,11,12,13]
C-Lines:
C-lines are hypo echoic subpleural focal images generated by condensed lung tissue [15]. These findings often indicate conditions like pneumonia or chronic inflammation. However, the term “C-line” is somewhat misleading, as these features are not true lines. A more precise description, such as hypo echoic densities with pleural interruptions, better captures their appearance and diagnostic significance. [fig 14]
A Pathology-Oriented Approach
Lung ultrasound interpretation can benefit from adopting a descriptive, pathology-focused terminology, akin to approaches used in advanced imaging techniques like CT or MRI. These modalities emphasize anatomical and pathological findings over the technical processes that generate the images. For example:
CT reports describe “ground-glass opacities” or “hyperdense masses,” without referring to imaging mechanisms like iterative reconstruction.
Similarly, LU should prioritize findings' clinical relevance over their physical origins.
Proposed Terminological Changes:
A-Lines: Describe as horizontal hyper-echoic lines (not as artifact) indicating (except normal lung) increased air/fluid ratios, observed in conditions like COPD, asthma, or pulmonary embolism.
B-Lines more than three refer to as vertical streaky hyper-echoic densities (not as artifact), reflecting interstitial fluid accumulation.
C-Lines: Describe as pleural thickening, irregularities without hypo or hyper echoic densities with pleural interruptions to improve precision.
Merlin’s Space: A Comprehensive Framework
Lichtenstein defines lung sliding as a homogeneous twinkling (shimmering, sparkling, or glittering) of Merlin’s space.[16] However, Merlin’s space is not a homogeneous twinkling area but a heterogeneous one, including two distinct components: the twinkling white area that begins from the pleural line, a grey area inside the black region beneath the twinkling white area, extending toward the screen’s edge. [17]
When evaluating a normal lung ultrasound, it is important to consider not just the A-profile but also the structural characteristics of Merlin’s space. These include the twinkling white area, the grey inside black region, and the ribs’ shadows. [Fig 14;15]
Evaluating the structural and functional components of Merlin’s space provides a holistic understanding of lung ultrasound findings:
Twinkling White Area: Analyze its configuration, density, homogeneity, and border regularity. Grey Area Inside Black Region: Assess its relationship with surrounding structures. Rib Shadows: Evaluate their width, length, and distance from the pleural line. This systematic approach helps identify the healthy bat sign, a hallmark of normal lung ultrasound findings. Deviations from this pattern may indicate the “sick bat sign,” associated with underlying pathologies like pneumonia, atelectasis, COPD, asthma, pleural thickness, etc. [18].
Implications for Clinical Practice
Healthy vs. Sick Bat Sign:
The healthy bat sign consists of uniform features in Merlin’s space, including the twinkling white area, grey-black transitions, and rib shadows.
The sick bat sign represents deviations from these norms, which may suggest diseases such as airtraping, discreet consolidation, effusion, or interstitial syndromes.[18]
Sick Bat sign refers to any ultrasound image in which one or more of the following components are observed, either together or separately:
• Thickened, irregular, serrated, or partially/fully absent pleural line.
• Absence or reduction of lung sliding.
• Identification of the gap between the two pleural lines: the parietal and visceral pleura.
• A "twinkling white" zone shortened or extended beyond the range of 3.5–6.5 cm.
• Expansion of the conical portion of the "twinkling white" zone.
• Heterogeneity of the "twinkling white" zone with vertical or horizontal hyper- or hypoechoic densities.
• Negative silhouette sign at the borders of the "twinkling white" zone.Fig
• "Waterfall" sign with a positive silhouette sign at the borders of the "twinkling white" zone.
• Absence, gap of twinkling white zone.
• Irregular contours of the "twinkling white" zone.
• Increased distance between the rib lines and the pleural line exceeding 0.5 cm.
• Position of the rib’s lines appearing almost adjacent and parallel to pleural line.
• Widening of rib shadows, with irregular rib contour visualization.
• Extension of rib shadows to the bottom of the screen, with or without hyper-echoic densities visible within the rib shadows.[18]
• Missing of gray in black zone. [Fig 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,910,11,12,13,14,15]
Beyond the A-Profile and B-profile
While the A-profile is characteristic of normal aerated lung tissue, it can also appear in pathologies like pulmonary embolism, COPD, asthma or bronchiectasis, infected bullae, enchinococcus cyst or hydropneumothorax.
Missing of B-profile, or heterogenity of subpleural area doesn’t exclude the discrete changes.
Thorough evaluation of components of Merlin’s space provides additional diagnostic clarity, revealing subtle pathological changes.
To advance lung ultrasound interpretation, we must move beyond artifact-based terminology and adopt a descriptive, pathology-oriented approach. This shift emphasizes the clinical and anatomical significance of findings, promoting more precise and effective diagnoses. This distinct approach to pulmonary ultrasound interpretation draws upon the groundbreaking work of Prof. Daniel Lichtenstein and the efforts of all who have championed the value of this examination.
Replacing artifact labels (e.g., A-lines, B-lines) with terms that reflect their structural and clinical relevance. Reframing the C-line to distinguish pleural irregularities from consolidations. Expanding the evaluation of Merlin’s space to include its structural components and deviations. Introducing the concepts of the Healthy and Sick Bat signs, which indicate whether there is an abnormality in the lung. These signs assist in making quick decisions regarding the need for a CT scan, helping to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure, lower sensitivity and delays associated with X-ray examination.
By refining nomenclature and focusing on the true visual characteristics of LU findings, clinicians can improve diagnostic accuracy and enhance the utility of lung ultrasound in critical care and respiratory medicine.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
