From Pixel to Diagnosis: Artificial Intelligence in the Recognition of Oral Mucosal Lesions Evidence, Accuracy, and Clinical Challenges

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/1102

From Pixel to Diagnosis: Artificial Intelligence in the Recognition of Oral Mucosal Lesions Evidence, Accuracy, and Clinical Challenges

  • Maria Clara Amorim Carvalho 1*
  • Victor Brenno Soares Alves 1
  • Rubia Hellen Nascimento Aires 1
  • Augusto Machado de Siqueira 2
  • Raquel Carvalho de Aguiar 3
  • Kelly Santos Rocha 3
  • Thiago Henrique Gonçalves Moreira 2

1Academic League of Trauma, Emergencies and Intensive Care (LATECI), Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

3Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

*Corresponding Author: Maria Clara Amorim Carvalho, Academic League of Trauma, Emergencies and Intensive Care (LATECI), Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Citation: Amorim Carvalho MC, Soares Alves VB, Nascimento Aires RH, Augusto Machado de Siqueira, Raquel Carvalho de Aguiar, et al, (2026), From Pixel to Diagnosis: Artificial Intelligence in the Recognition of Oral Mucosal Lesions Evidence, Accuracy, and Clinical Challenges, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 35(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/1102

Copyright: © 2026, Maria Clara Amorim Carvalho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 23 April 2026 | Accepted: 12 May 2026 | Published: 10 June 2026

Keywords: artificial intelligence; oral diagnosis; lesions of the oral mucosa; deep learning; digital dentistry

Abstract

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the area of stomatology has promoted significant transformations in diagnostic methods, especially through the verification of digital images. The present study aims to analyze the scientific evidence on the application of artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, evaluating its diagnostic accuracy, clinical potential and the challenges related to its implementation in dental practice. The search engines used to select the articles included Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science indexers, using the following Portuguese language descriptors: "Artificial Intelligence"; "Deep Learning" "Machine Learning by Representation"; "Oral lesions"; "Oral Neoplasms" and "Diagnosis", combined through the Boolean operators AND and OR, aiming to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the research strategy. The results show that AI systems have a high capacity for pattern recognition, with accuracy similar to or superior to conventional methods, favoring early screening and diagnostic standardization. However, limitations related to data quality, algorithmic biases, clinical validation, and ethical aspects still restrict its wide application. Thus, AI is a promising complementary tool in the diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions, acting as a support to the dentist and requiring further research to increase its clinical reliability.

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the main technological milestones of the twenty-first century, consolidating itself over the years as a crucial tool for data analysis and its application in various scientific fields. In the health area, for example, the development of algorithms capable of processing large volumes of data has contributed to enhancing diagnostic capacity and assisting professionals in clinical interpretation, promoting greater accuracy, efficiency, agility, and support for evidence-based decision-making (SILVA et al., 2024).

Parallel to this, this advance is directly related to the growing digitalization of health systems and the massive availability of biomedical data, thus contributing to the development of computational models capable of recognizing increasingly complex patterns and being able to predict clinical outcomes more quickly. In this way, AI has come to occupy a strategic role in the contemporary health area, helping not only in the diagnosis, but also in the monitoring and prevention of diseases through the automated analysis of clinical and epidemiological information (OLIVEIRA; SANTOS, 2023).

In the field of diagnostic imaging, deep learning techniques have gained prominence for transforming digital images into structured sets of analyzable data. In this process, each image is composed of pixels, minimal units that store information on color, intensity, and texture, allowing artificial neural networks to detect visual patterns associated with pathological changes. Recent studies demonstrate that these systems can achieve high levels of accuracy in disease detection, consolidating computer vision as a complementary tool to human evaluation (COSTA et al., 2024).

However, despite the strategic potential, the clinical incorporation of AI still involves challenges related to scientific validation, algorithmic transparency, and practical implementation in healthcare services. The need for consistent evidence is particularly pertinent, especially relevant in areas on the rise, such as dentistry, in which the automated identification of oral mucosal lesions emerges as an innovative strategy to expand early screening, reduce diagnostic failures, and strengthen clinical practice through the integration of technology and scientific evidence (FERREIRA et al., 2024).

This study aims to conduct a literature review on the application of artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, investigating its fundamentals based on the computational analysis of digital images, the diagnostic accuracy reported in the literature and the clinical challenges associated with the incorporation of these technologies in dental practice.

Methodology

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar indexes were used as search engines, using descriptors from the Portuguese language: "Artificial Intelligence", "Machine Learning", "Deep Learning", "Oral Lesions", "Oral Neoplasms" and "Diagnosis", and from the English language: "artificial intelligence"; "deep learning" and "machine learning" combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. Only articles published in the last five years (2021–2026) were included. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 23 studies were evaluated in full text, of which 10 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria or were out of scope. The inclusion criteria considered original studies and systematic reviews on artificial intelligence applied to the diagnosis of oral lesions; Editorials, opinion reports, duplicates, and studies without clinical or methodological relevance were excluded. In the end, 12 articles were included and analyzed regarding methodology, clinical relevance and scientific evidence.

Literature Review

Artificial intelligence has emerged as an innovative tool in the diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions, providing subsidies for the identification and classification of potentially malignant alterations and collaborating for greater diagnostic accuracy. However, its clinical application still faces some challenges related to the validation of systems and safe integration into dental practice, requiring additional methodological and scientific advances (WARNAKULASURIYA; KERR, 2022).

According to Hajibagheri et al. (2025), the application of artificial intelligence-based language models, such as ChatGPT-4, has shown promising performance in the diagnostic identification of oral lesions based on textual clinical descriptions. In the research, the model was evaluated through the resolution of multiple-choice clinical questions previously validated by specialists, showing assertiveness in the interpretation of signs and symptoms and in the elaboration of differential diagnostic reasoning. However, the authors emphasize that the tool does not replace direct clinical evaluation, since it depends exclusively on the information provided and does not perform physical examination, and should be established only as a complementary resource aimed mainly at educational support and aid in clinical decision-making, and not as a definitive diagnostic method.

In parallel to this, a study conducted by Tiryaki et al. (2024) found that deep learning models such as ResNet, VGG, and GoogLeNet, can act as a tool for classifying different types of lingual lesions, providing high diagnostic accuracy. The results indicate that the application of artificial intelligence can reduce the subjectivity of traditional clinical assessment, expanding the potential of automated screening in stomatology.

In this scenario, artificial intelligence has contributed to the early diagnosis of oral cancer through the automated analysis of clinical and histopathological images, through the use of deep learning architectures and artificial neural systems, thus allowing the identification of patterns associated with malignant lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. (SANTOS; BESERRA, 2025).

As described by Gomes et al. (2023), AI-based technologies have shown great potential in stomatology through the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) capable of automatically classifying elementary lesions of the oral mucosa from clinical images, evidencing an agile and safe approach to initial screening based on the recognition of the different morphological patterns addressed.

In line with the elucidated data, it is also worth noting that artificial intelligence encompasses different computational approaches. In this sense, there are important differences between machine learning and deep learning in the diagnosis of oral cancer, especially regarding information processing and model performance. Machine learning generally relies on the researcher's prior selection of image characteristics or clinical data, which can limit the system's analytical capacity. On the other hand, deep learning, based on deep neural networks, automatically extracts patterns directly from the raw data, allowing the identification of more complex and subtle characteristics of the lesions. (AL-RAWI et al., 2022).

Artificial intelligence models based on natural language processing have demonstrated relevant performance in the formulation of differential diagnoses from simulated clinical cases, evidencing the ability of these systems to interpret signs and symptoms described in textual language, during anamnesis and organize diagnostic hypotheses in a coherent and skillful way. (HUH, 2023).

In this scenario, despite the advancement of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases, it is possible to perceive important limitations related mainly to the dependence on the quality and diversity of the databases used to train the algorithms, which can compromise the generalization of the results in different clinical populations. In addition, it is also notorious that variations in the conditions of image capture, differences between equipment, and lack of methodological standardization can negatively influence the performance of the models, generating a risk of diagnostic biases (ANDRZEJCZAK et al., 2026). 

Results And Discussion

The analysis of the studies presented in Table 1 showed significant advances in the application of artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, especially in improving early diagnosis and supporting clinical decision-making. The recent development of machine learning and deep learning techniques has demonstrated a consistent increase in diagnostic sensitivity and a greater ability to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, mainly through the automated analysis of intraoral images and digital clinical data (AL-RAWI et al., 2022; ROKHSHAD et al., 2024).

Contemporary reviews have highlighted that convolutional neural networks have enabled pixel-by-pixel analyses of clinical images, favoring greater diagnostic accuracy and contributing to the standardization of visual evaluation, traditionally dependent on the examiner's individual experience (BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024; ANDRZEJCZAK et al., 2026). At the same time, applications based on natural language processing have expanded the scope of artificial intelligence by demonstrating the ability to assist in clinical reasoning and the formulation of differential diagnoses, evidencing the growing integration between computer systems and dental practice (HUH, 2023).

In the clinical context, the studies also indicated the potential of artificial intelligence for personalizing therapeutic planning, longitudinal monitoring, and organization of scientific data, reinforcing its role as a complementary tool to the dental surgeon (OSSOWSKA et al., 2023; AGUIAR, 2025). However, despite the promising diagnostic performance consistently reported, limitations persist related to the heterogeneity of the databases, lack of methodological standardization, and the need for multicenter clinical validations before the definitive incorporation of these technologies into the care routine (DIAGNOSTICS, 2026; BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025). Thus, recent literature converges in indicating that artificial intelligence acts as a support system capable of increasing diagnostic accuracy and reducing interpretative biases, without replacing professional clinical judgment (SILVA et al., 2022).

Author/YearCountryType of studyApplication of AIDatabase / MethodsConclusion
Al-Rawi et al., 2022United KingdomNarrative reviewDiagnosis of oral cancerMachine learning and neural networks applied to clinical imagingIt showed that AI increased diagnostic sensitivity and helped in the early detection of oral malignant lesions.
Silva et al., 2022BrazilIntegrative reviewEarly diagnosis of mouth cancerAutomated clinical image analysis and literature reviewIt indicated that AI favored the early identification of potentially malignant lesions and aided the diagnostic process.
Huh, 2023South KoreaExperimental studyAI-assisted diagnostic reasoningNatural language processing applied to simulated clinical casesIt demonstrated that AI systems correctly included differential diagnoses in most of the simulated clinical analyses.
Ossowska et al., 2023PolandLiterature reviewAI-based dental diagnosisMachine learning applied to clinical images and digital dataIt concluded that AI showed potential for diagnostic personalization and dental therapeutic planning.
Rokhshad et al., 2024IranSystematic reviewClassification of oral mucosal lesionsDeep learning applied to intraoral photographyIt demonstrated that AI algorithms achieved high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating 
     between benign and malignant lesions.
BMC Medical Imaging, 2024InternationalSystematic reviewAutomated Injury RecognitionConvolutional neural networks with pixel-by-pixel analysisIt showed that deep learning models improved diagnostic accuracy in the analysis of medical images.
Aguiar, 2025BrazilNarrative reviewMonitoring and diagnosis of oral changesAI-assisted literature reviewHe indicated that AI contributed to scientific organization and support for the clinical follow-up of patients at risk.
BMC Oral Health, 2025InternationalSystematic reviewAutomated Dental DiagnosisDeep learning applied to clinical imagingIt demonstrated that AI showed high diagnostic performance and potential future clinical application.
Andrzejczak et al., 2026PolandSystematic reviewDiagnosis of oral mucosal diseasesMachine learning and deep learning in digital clinical imagingIt concluded that AI showed promising diagnostic performance, but dependent on additional clinical validation and methodological standardization.

Table 1: Summary of the included studies on the application of artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions

Table 2 shows that artificial intelligence has had relevant clinical advantages in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, especially due to the high capacity for image analysis, speed in data processing, and potential increase in diagnostic accuracy, contributing not only to early screening, but also to the standardization of clinical evaluations. However, the limitations observed included dependence on large and well-labeled databases, the possibility of algorithmic biases, the need for validation in real clinical scenarios, and difficulties related to the interpretation of the models by health professionals. In this way, the studies analyzed converged in indicating that AI should be understood as a complementary tool to clinical judgment, whose effectiveness depends on the integration between technology, professional training, and robust scientific evidence (SANTOS et al., 2022; SILVA et al., 2023; LI et al., 2024; OLIVEIRA et al., 2023; FERREIRA et al., 2025).

The flowchart shown in (Figure 1 ) exposes in a summarized way the process of applying artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, which begins with the acquisition of clinical images, followed by algorithmic processing and ends with diagnostic support. It is observed that the integration between computational analysis and clinical evaluation contributed to greater diagnostic standardization and potential increase in the early detection of potentially malignant lesions. However, limitations remain related to the quality of databases, the need for expanded clinical validation, and the dependence on professional interpretation, reinforcing the role of AI as an auxiliary tool for dental surgeons and not as a substitute for face-to-face assessment and clinical decision (SANTOS et al., 2022; SILVA et al., 2023; LI et al., 2024; OLIVEIRA et al., 2023; COSTA et al., 2020; FERREIRA et al., 2025). 

Table 2: Comparison between the clinical advantages and clinical limitations of artificial intelligence applied to the recognition of oral cavity lesions

Figure 1: Flowchart representative of the process of applying artificial intelligence in the recognition of oral mucosal lesions, from the acquisition of clinical images, algorithmic processing and analysis by machine learning models, to the support of diagnostic decision-making by the dentist.

Final Considerations

The present literature review found through the synthesis of the information mentioned above that artificial intelligence, by transforming information from the pixel to the clinical diagnosis, has high potential as an auxiliary tool in the recognition of lesions of the oral mucosa, contributing to greater diagnostic accuracy, standardization of clinical opinions and early detection of potentially malignant alterations. However, its application still faces obstacles since it depends directly on expanded clinical validation, methodological standardization and integration into professional judgment, thus consolidating itself as a complementary resource — and not a substitute — for dental practice.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova