Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-0487/213
Master of Public Health, Fareast International University, Bangladesh.
*Corresponding Author: Abul Hashim., Master of Public Health, Fareast International University.
Citation: Abul Hashim. (2026). Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-Diabetes in Selected Areas of Bangladesh, Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research, 9(3); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/213
Copyright: © 2026, Abul Hashim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 July 2026 | Accepted: 22 July 2026 | Published: 29 July 2026
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; associated factors; bangladesh
Diabetes mellitus is related to cardiovascular disease, is one of the main global health problems. A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted to find out diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes among adults in selected districts in Bangladesh A convenient non-probability sampling technique was used to select study participants. The World Health Organization stepwise approach for non-communicable diseases surveillance was deployed to collect data. Glucose meter was used to check randomly venous blood glucose level. A total of 400 participants were included in the study. The prevalence of DM was found 9.75%. The prevalence of prediabetes was also found to be 10.5%. The age, gender, waist circumference, nutritional status, smoking habit, physical activities were significantly associated with diabetes mellitus. In this study, higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus was observed than other studies.
Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Insulin deficiency in turn leads to chronic hyperglycemia with disturbances of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism [1]. It is one of the chronic non-communicable diseases which have emerged as a leading global health problem. It is also a known risk factor for blindness, vascular brain diseases, renal failure, and limb amputations [2]. According to the International Diabetes Federation Atlas guideline report, currently, there are 352 million adults with impaired glucose tolerance who are at high risk of developing diabetes in the future. In 2017, it was estimated that 425 million people (20-79 years of age) suffered from DM, and the number is expected to rise to 629 million by 2045 [3]. Its global prevalence was about 8% in 2011 and is predicted to rise to 10% by 2030.Nearly 80% of people with diabetes live in low- and middle-income countries. Asia and the eastern Pacific region are particularly affected: in 2011, China was home to the largest number of adults with diabetes (i.e. 90.0 million, or 9% of the population), followed by India and Bangladesh [4]. However, many governments and public health planners remain largely unaware of the current prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes, the potential for a future rise in prevalence and the serious complications associated with the disease. Consequently, knowledge of the prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes and of related risk factors could raise awareness of the disease and lead to new policies and strategies for prevention and management. According to the International Diabetes Federation, the prevalence will be 13% by 2030 [4,5]. However, no nationally representative, epidemiological study of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes has been carried out in the country.
The study was conducted in Dhaka, Sirajganj, Habiganj and Jessore District in Bangladesh. A community-based cross sectional study was conducted. The source population was individuals aged 18 years and above permanently living there. The sample size was calculated was found to be four hundreds. Convenient sampling technique was used; the primary sampling units, four districts were randomly selected. Sample size was equally distributed to each of the selected districts. Finally, systematic random sampling technique was employed to select households to be visited for data collection. From the selected households, eligible adults were identified, and if there were more than one in a household, then one were randomly selected. Individuals who were taking any drug with possible impact on glucose metabolism other than antidiabetes drugs were excluded to avoid false positive pre-diabetes or diabetes mellitus. Data on demographic and behavioral characteristics were collected by trained personnel through a face-to-face interview using a questionnaire. The field study team was composed of enumerators, laboratory technicians, nurses, and supervisors. The World Health Organization stepwise approach for non-communicable disease surveillance was used to collect the data [6]. In this step, demographic and behavioral risk factors were collected through face-to-face interviews using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Each participant was questioned for age, sex, educational status, marital status, occupation type, physical activity, history of raised blood pressure and diabetes, fruit and vegetable intake, alcohol consumption, and smoking habit. Physical measurements of height and weight needed to calculate body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and blood pressure were taken in this step. Blood pressure (BP) was taken in a sitting position from the right arm using a digital sphygmomanometer. Two readings were taken 5 minutes apart, and the mean was considered as the final BP result. Prehypertension is defined as systolic BP of 120–139 and diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg. Hypertension is defined as systolic BP of ⋝140 mmHg or diastolic BP of ⋝90 mmHg. A portable weight and height scale was used to measure the weight of the participant wearing light clothes and height in upright standing position on a flat surface. Then, body mass index (BMI) was calculated by weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared formula. BMI <18.5 kg/m2 is considered as underweight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 as normal, 25-29.9 kg/m2 as overweight, and ⋝30 kg/m2 as obese. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the approximate midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, using a flexible plastic tape. WC values>94 and >80 cm for men and women, respectively, were considered high according to the World Health Organization recommendation. The Accu-Chek Active system uses a capillary blood sample which is set to plasma serum standard, showing result in plasma glucose values. This measurement was immediately performed for all participants, and the results were recorded in the questionnaire. Fasting capillary blood samples were collected three times at different occasions (for three consecutive days) from a single study participant, and glucose measurement was carried out within fractions of seconds after sample collection. Then, their average was taken for analysis, and this might have minimized the appearance of abnormal results. The diagnosis of DM was based on the American Diabetes Association diabetes mellitus classification criteria with fasting blood glucose of ⋝126 mg/dl being considered as positive for DM; impaired fasting glucose, FBG: ⋜110 mg/dl to <126 mg/dl; normoglycemic, FBG: ⋜61 mg/dl to <110 mg/dl), and hypoglycemic, <61 mg/dl [7]. The data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed using the SPSS version 23.0 software package.
The mean age of participants was 43.43±19.82 years. Two hundred forty-one (60.25%) of the participants were younger than 50 years old. 58.75% of study participants were male. More than half (56.75%) of adults either attended primary education or did not attend formal education. Two thirds of them (68.5%) were married while 86 (21.5%) were single. Concerning occupation, 140 (35%) adults were farmer whereas 88 (22%) were housewife (Table 1).
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 235 | 58.75 | |
| Female | 165 | 41.25 | |
| Age | |||
| 18-35 | 115 | 28.75 | |
| 36-50 | 126 | 31.5 | |
| 51-65 | 74 | 18.5 | |
| 66-93 | 85 | 21.25 | |
| Education | |||
| HSC and above | 101 | 13.5 | |
| SSC | 119 | 29.75 | |
| Primary | 154 | 38.5 | |
| No education | 73 | 18.25 | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 274 | 68.5 | |
| Single | 86 | 21.5 | |
| Divorced | 23 | 5.75 | |
| Widowed | 17 | 4.25 | |
| Occupation | |||
| Housewife | 88 | 22 | |
| Farmer | 140 | 35 | |
| Private Job | 72 | 18 | |
| Other† | 100 | 25 | |
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics.
From total of participants responding, 173(43.25%) were smokers. Only Ten (2.5%) participants consumed alcohol over the last 30 days proceeding the time of data collection. Three hundred six (76.5%) participants ate fruits two or fewer days a week. Forty-seven (11.75%) participants ate vegetables for two or fewer days during regular week days. One hundred thirty seven (34.25%) adults were not involved in adequate physical activity or physical inactivity (Table 2).
| Tobacco status | Frequency | Percent |
| Ever smoking cigarette | ||
| Yes | 173 | 43.25 |
| No | 227 | 56.75 |
| Current alcohol consumption | ||
| Yes | 10 | 2.5 |
| No | 390 | 97.5 |
| Fruits consumption per week | ||
| Two or fewer | 306 | 76.5 |
| Three to four | 73 | 18.25 |
| Five or more | 21 | 5.25 |
| Vegetables consumption per week | ||
| Two or fewer | 47 | 11.75 |
| Three to four | 82 | 20.5 |
| Five or more | 271 | 67.75 |
| Total physical activities | ||
| Active | 263 | 65.75 |
| Inactive | 137 | 34.25 |
Table 2: Distribution of adults’ behavioral characteristics.
| Variables | Frequency | Percent |
| Hypertension | ||
| Yes | 159 | 39.75 |
| No | 241 | 60.25 |
| Waist circumference | ||
| Normal | 216 | 54 |
| High | 184 | 46 |
| Body mass index | ||
| Underweight | 46 | 11.5 |
| Normal | 234 | 58.5 |
| Overweight | 93 | 23.25 |
| Obese | 27 | 6.75 |
| Fasting blood glucose | ||
| Diabetic | 39 | 9.75 |
| Pre-diabetic | 46 | 11.5 |
| Normoglycemic | 305 | 76.25 |
| Hypoglycemic | 10 | 2.5 |
Table 3: Physical and biochemical measurement characteristics of study population.
The majority, 76.25% (305/400), of the study participants were normoglycemic, whilst 11.5% (46/400) of the respondents were pre-diabetics (Table 3) (Figure-1). The prevalence of DM was found to be 9.75% (39 out of 400).

Figure 1: Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes.
Study participants with high waist circumference were 2.57 times more likely to be DM positive compared to those whose waist circumference was normal (OR = 2.57) Regarding body mass index, being overweight and obesity was also independently associated with the prevalence of DM. Respondents who were overweight were 2.587 times at more risk of being DM positive than those with normal body mass index (OR = 2.587). Respondents who were obese were 4.17 times at more risk of being DM positive than those with normal body mass index (OR = 4.17). Similarly, individuals with smoking habit were about 1.253 times more likely to be DM positive when compared to participants who never smoked in their lifetime (OR = 1.253). Respondents who were inactive were 5.587 times at more risk of being DM positive than those were active (OR = 5.587). Female respondents who were 1.568 times at more risk of being DM positive than male respondents (OR = 1.568). Age of respondents was also independently associated with the prevalence of DM. Respondents aged 36-50 years old, 51-65 years old and 66-93 years old were 1.475 times, 2.136 times and 2.563 times respectively at more risk of being DM positive than 18-35 years old respondents. (Table 4)
| Variable | DM status | OR | p-value | |
| Yes (%) | No (%) | |||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 19(8.09) | 216(91.91) | 1 | 0.043 |
| Female | 20(12.12) | 145(87.88) | 1.568 | |
| Age | ||||
| 18-35 | 7(6.08) | 108(93.92) | 1 | |
| 36-50 | 11(8.73) | 115(91.27) | 1.475 | |
| 51-65 | 9(12.16) | 65(87.84) | 2.136 | 0.0037 |
| 66-93 | 12(14.12) | 73(85.88) | 2.536 | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Housewife | 7(7.95) | 81(92.05) | 0.993 | |
| Farmer | 13(9.28) | 127(90.72) | 1.17 | 0.0739 |
| Private Job | 11(15.27) | 61(84.73) | 2.07 | |
| Other† | 8(8) | 92(92) | 1 | |
| Ever smoking cigarette | ||||
| Yes | 19(10.98) | 154(89.02) | 1.253 | |
| No | 20(8.81) | 207(91.19) | 1 | 0.039 |
| Current alcohol consumption | ||||
| Yes | 1(10) | 9(90) | 1.029 | |
| No | 38(9.74) | 352(90.26) | 1 | 0.913 |
| Total physical activities | ||||
| Active | 14(5.38) | 249(94.62) | 1 | |
| Inactive | 25(18.25) | 112(81.75) | 5.587 | 0.0034 |
| Nutritional Status | ||||
| Underweight | 4(8.69) | 42(91.31) | 1.39 | |
| Normal Weight | 15(6.41) | 219(93.59) | 1 | |
| Overweight | 14(15.05) | 79(84.95) | 2.587 | 0.0431 |
| Obese | 6(22.22) | 21(77.78) | 4.17 | |
| Hypertension | ||||
| Yes | 13(8.17) | 146(91.83) | 0.736 | |
| No | 26(11.26) | 215(88.74) | 1 | 0.121 |
| Waist Circumference | ||||
| Normal | 13(6.02) | 203(93.98) | 1 | |
| High | 26(14.13) | 158(85.87) | 2.57 | 0.0427 |
Table 4: Multivariable analysis of factors associated with diabetes mellitus.
This study shows that the prevalence of DM is found to be 9.75%. In 2013 according to IDF the prevalence of diabetes in Bangladesh was 6.3%, in 2017 6.9%, but some studies estimated 8.5% to 10%. The prevalence of prediabetes in the present study was found to be 11.5%. This is higher than the estimated Bangladeshi national prevalence of 5–8%. This suggests that the prevalence of DM in the study area may increase in the near future as there is a risk of progression of pre-diabetic condition to diabetic. The present study has described some proven and hypothesized associated factors. This study revealed that there was a significant association between smoking habit and diabetes mellitus. The exact mechanism why smoking increases the risk of diabetes and deteriorates glucose homeostasis has not been fully elucidated, but the available evidence shows that the habit increases insulin resistance. Smoking has also further been associated with the risk of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer [8]. It has been postulated that expanded abdominal fat stores affect insulin action by releasing free fatty acids. In addition, fat cells secrete signaling factors, for example, interlukein-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α which are involved in the development of insulin resistance [9]. The major limitation of this study is that diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by glucose meter from capillary blood; this is not as accurate and reliable as plasma glucose estimation diagnosed using a spectrophotometer/colorimeter. Moreover, it is possible that participants did not trace their exact fasting time and this might have affected the overall DM prevalence.
This study indicated 9.75% prevalence of diabetes mellitus which was somewhat higher than the projected national prevalence of DM (5-8%). This result is an alarming condition as it has been predicted that much of the global increase in DM is forecasted to be in Bangladesh. Waist circumferences, body mass index, smoking habit, hypertension, and physical activities were significantly associated with the diabetes. These factors associated with DM were potentially modifiable. Therefore, targeting the prevention strategy to such modifiable risk factors might reduce the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the area.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,