Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/209
Associate Professor, International Institute of Health Sciences.
*Corresponding Author: Md Shafiullah Prodhania., Associate Professor, International Institute of Health Sciences.
Citation: Md Shafiullah Prodhania (2026), Combined Effect of Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (Prp) In Case of Avascular Necrosis, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 7(4); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/209
Copyright: © 2026, Md Shafiullah Prodhania. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 July 2026 | Accepted: 20 July 2026 | Published: 24 July 2026
Keywords: platelet-rich plasma; avascular necrosis; physiotherapy
Avascular necrosis of femoral head is a debilitating disease frequently progressing to femoral head collapse and joint destruction. The combined approach (physiotherapy and Platelet-rich plasma) addresses the structural and biomechanical issues of Avascular Necrosis. The current study aimed to find effectiveness of this combined approach results in better functional outcomes and higher satisfaction scores compared to utilizing either treatment alone. This was quasi-experimental study conducted among 168 patients attending at Dhaka Pain, Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation Center (DPRC) hospital for treatment. All patients were divided into two separate intervention group and outcome was measured by Chi-square test. Excellent improvement was found sixteen times higher among patients who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma than patients were given physiotherapy only and the same scenario was seen in case of very good improvement. Not satisfactory improvement was none who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma. The effectiveness of intervention was statistically significant. More center based gold standard randomized clinical trial can be conducted in order to get more accurate result.
Avascular necrosis of femoral head is a localized destruction of the femoral head caused by a variety of complex reasons, which eventually progresses to collapse of the femoral head and loss of joint function.[1] Combining Platelet-Rich Plasma with physiotherapy creates a synergistic, non-surgical approach to treating early-stage Avascular Necrosis. Platelet-Rich Plasma promotes tissue regeneration and reduces inflammation, while physiotherapy preserves joint mobility and strengthens surrounding musculature. Together, they can significantly reduce pain and delay the need for joint replacement. Literature confirms that avascular necrosis of femoral head is a prevalent disease for orthopedics that leads to total hip arthroplasty in 80% of cases.[2] The interruption of the blood supply and increased intraosseous pressure lead to cellular death in trabecular bone and marrow, then cause collapse of articular cartilage and subsequently secondary osteoarthritis.[3] The course of avascular necrosis of femoral head is rarely reversible, eventually leading to loss of joint function.[4]
This was quasi-experimental study conducted among 168 patients attending at Dhaka Pain, Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation Center (DPRC) hospital for treatment. All patients were divided into two separate intervention group and outcome was measured by Chi-square test. First of all careful history taking was carried out followed by documents checking and physical examination was done and investigation was done according to patients need. Rapport building and consent taking were ensured. Detail procedure of the study was explained and confidentiality was maintained throughout the study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 was used to data analysis. Improvement was divided into five categories as like excellent, very good, good, satisfactory and not satisfactory considering pain reduction and functional outcome.
| Age group (in years) | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency(Percentage) | Frequency(Percentage) | |
| ≤20 | 3(1.8) | 8(4.8) |
| 21-40 | 67(39.9) | 59(35.1) |
| 41-60 | 12(7.1) | 13(7.7) |
| >60 | 2(1.2) | 4(2.4) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Table 1: Age distribution of the subjects.
Nearly two-third of the patients in both group represented from 21-40 years followed by 12%-13% from 41-60 years and 3%-8% from ≤20 years respectively.
| Gender | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency(Percentage) | Frequency(Percentage) | |
| Male | 66(39.3) | 63(37.5) |
| Female | 18(10.7) | 21(12.5) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Table 2: Gender distribution of the subjects.
Approximately three-fourth of the patients was male and one-third was female.
| Occupation | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency(Percentage) | Frequency(Percentage) | |
| Day labor | 12(7.1) | 9(5.4) |
| Housewife | 20(11.9) | 16(9.5) |
| Service | 36(21.4) | 37(22.0) |
| Student | 9(5.4) | 11(6.5) |
| Business | 1(0.6) | 4(2.4) |
| Others | 6(3.6) | 7(4.2) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Table 3: Occupation distribution of the subjects.
In case of occupation, service, housewife and day labor were dominant.
| Marital status | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency (Percentage) | Frequency (Percentage) | |
| Single | 22(13.1) | 25(14.9) |
| Married | 62(36.9) | 59(35.1) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Table 4: Marital status of the subjects.
Two-third of the patients was married and few were single.
| Marital status | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency(Percentage) | Frequency(Percentage) | |
| Single | 22(13.1) | 25(14.9) |
| Married | 62(36.9) | 59(35.1) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Table 5: Effect of holistic approach ((Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma) in case of avascular necrosis.
| Intervention | Improvement | Total | Chi-square value | p value | ||||
| Excellent | Very good | Good | Satisfactory | Not satisfactory | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
| Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | 27(16.1) | 31(18.5) | 21(12.5) | 5(3.0) | 0(0.0) | 84(50.0) |
65.56 |
0.001 |
| Physiotherapy | 1(0.6) | 13(7.7) | 24(14.3) | 30(17.9) | 16(9.5) | 84(50.0) | ||
| Total | 28(16.7) | 44(26.2) | 45(26.8) | 35(20.8) | 16(9.5) | 168(100.0) | ||
Excellent improvement was found sixteen times higher among patients who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma than patients were given physiotherapy only and the same scenario was seen in case of very good improvement. Not satisfactory improvement was none who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma. The effectiveness of intervention was statistically significant (p=0.001<0.05).
| Gender | Physiotherapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) group | Physiotherapy group |
| Frequency(Percentage) | Frequency(Percentage) | |
| Male | 66(39.3) | 63(37.5) |
| Female | 18(10.7) | 21(12.5) |
| Total | 84(50.0) | 84(50.0) |
Platelet-Rich Plasma is a concentration of own platelets that contains growth factors and cytokines. When injected into the affected joint, it stimulates angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation) and osteogenesis (new bone formation), which accelerates the healing of necrotic lesions and protects the cartilage. Physiotherapy plays an essential role in optimizing the healing environment and restoring function. It helps prevent muscle atrophy, improves range of motion (ROM), and teaches controlled, safe movement patterns that offload stress from the damaged bone. The present study found that excellent improvement was found sixteen times higher among patients who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma than patients were given physiotherapy only and the same scenario was seen in case of very good improvement. Not satisfactory improvement was none who were given physiotherapy along with Platelet-Rich Plasma. It is known that PRP therapy delivers growth factors directly to the site of injury. This can stimulate the healing of tendons, ligaments, or joint cartilage. However, healing tissue requires guided movement and strengthening to function properly. Without rehabilitation, even a biologically enhanced structure may remain weak, tight, or unbalanced. Physiotherapy addresses these challenges through: controlled loading of healing tissues, mobility exercises to restore range of motion, strength training to stabilize surrounding muscles, neuromuscular re-education to improve movement patterns, strategies to prevent recurrence or overuse. Together, PRP and physiotherapy form a two-part solution: one addresses biological healing, while the other addresses functional recover.5-8 The timing of physiotherapy after PRP depends on the treated area and the condition being managed.5-8 Most patients begin gentle therapeutic exercises within a few days of their PRP injection, once any post-injection inflammation subsides. In some cases, early movement is encouraged to prevent stiffness. Many soft tissue injuries respond well to a combined approach of PRP and physiotherapy. This is especially true for injuries involving repetitive strain or biomechanical imbalances. While many patients experience improvement from combining PRP and physiotherapy, recovery is rarely immediate. It’s important to remain patient and committed to rehab plan. Tissue healing is a biological process that unfolds over weeks or months. Physiotherapy helps ensure that healing leads to long-term function, not just pain reduction. In some cases, a single course of PRP and rehab may be enough to return to full activity. In others, especially in chronic conditions or more advanced degeneration, maintenance exercises and occasional follow-up care may be needed.5-8.
The study concluded that effectiveness of intervention (physiotherapy and PRP) was statistically significant in case of avascular necrosis. More center based gold standard randomized clinical trial can be conducted in order to get more accurate result.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,