Acute Retinal Necrosis A Potentially Visual Devastating Affection

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/ECO.2021/004

Acute Retinal Necrosis A Potentially Visual Devastating Affection

  • Nawal Khanaouchi 1*
  • R.zerrouk 1
  • Y.Mouzarii 1
  • K.Reda 1
  • A.Oubaaz 1
  • A.khoyali 1
  • 1* Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  • 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  • 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  • 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  • 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  • 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Military Instruction Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco

*Corresponding Author: Nawal Khanaouchi

Citation: Nawal Khanaouchi, A.khoyali1, R.zerrouk, Y.Mouzarii, K.Reda, A.Oubaaz (2021). Acute Retinal Necrosis A Potentially Visual Devastating Affection. Experimental and Clinical Ophthalmology. 1(1). DOI: 10.31579/ECO.2021/004

Copyright: © 2021 Nawal Khanaouchi This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Received: 12 August 2021 | Accepted: 31 August 2021 | Published: 13 September 2021

Keywords: ARN syndrome; granulomatous uveitis; visual loss; vitritis; diabetic

Abstract

Acute retinal necrosis syndrome (ARN syndrome) is a rare condition, caused by DNA viruses. The diagnosis of this condition is mainly based on the suggestive clinical appearance. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent visual loss. We report the case of a 56 -year-old women , diabetic, who presented to the emergency room for rapid decrease  of visual function  of her left eye which revealed granulomatous uveitis with retinal necrosis

Introduction

Described firstly in 1971 by Uryama et al. The acute retinal necrosis syndrome  (ARN syndrome) is a rare condition, caused by  DNA viruses   mainly Varicella zoster virus (VZV) and Herpes simplex virus  type( 1 and 2 ), cytomegalovirus (CMV)  is less commen ,The  diagnosis is mainly based on the suggestive clinical appearance  .the  institution of antiviral  therapy should not be delayed . Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to salvage vision in this frequently blinding condition and preventing involvement of the fellow eye. 

The prognosis remains poor due to the extension of retinal necrosis and the risk of retinal detachment in an area of ​​retinal atrophy.

Case report

Clinical Case

We report the case of a 56 -year-old women , diabetic, who presented to the emergency room for rapidly progressive loss of vision of  her  left eye, associated with redness and ocular pain evolving, for 10 days with worsening of symptoms since 3 days.

The visual acuity at   admission was at counting fingers; slit lamp examination showed granulomatous retro-desmetic opacities with + 3 cells in the anterior chamber, IOP at 18 mm Hg in the OS. 

The fundus examination of the left eye, revealed severe vitritis, associated with necrotic-hemorrhagic patches, and cystoid vasculitis and macular edema. 

On The right eye visual acuity, was up to 20/20, the slit lamp exam of this eye was unremarkable.

Angiography showed the presence of oclusive vasculitis and perimacular patchs of retinitis, associated with macular edema. Figure 

Figure 1: Acute retinal necrosis with severe vitritis and macular edema before treatment 

In view of the clinical aspect, an acute viral retinal necrosis was suspected, and an intra veinous   antiviral-based treatment was started urgently with aciclovir at a dose of 10mg / kg / 8h followed 48h later by a bolus of methylprednisolone at a dose of 500mg per day for 3 days.

Simultaneously a  Polymerase chain reaction of the aqueous tap was done and it turn  positive for HSV-1 and negative for HSV-2, Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV).the diagnosis of viral retinitis was made. 

The evolution was marked by the disappearance of inflammatory reaction in the anterior chamber, a manifest   decrease of vititis after 3 days of treatment. After 1 month of treatment, the visual acuity of the left eye is limited to 20/200, with a calm anterior segment and regression of   peri-vascual sheath as well as macular edema. Figure 2

Figure 2: Manifest Improvement after antiviral treatment, disappearance of vitritis and regression of perivascular inflammation, although we notice the presence of perimacular ischemic zones with Micro-vascular angiopathy and neovascularization

The patient is currently on antiviral treatment taking oral prophylactic dose, oral corticosteroids in decreasing dose and IVT antiangiogenics due to the presence of an area of ​​central ischemia complicated by neovascularization not accessible to PRP.

Discussion

ARN syndrome is clinically defined by the presence of the classic triad associating full-thickness retinal necrosis of yellowish white appearance with peripheral location and well-limited edges,  vasculitis and more or less severe vitritis. Other clinical manifestations may be indicative of this condition such as inflammation of the anterior segment complicated by ocular hypertonia, macular or papillary edema.

In decreasing order of the pathogens involved in ARN  syndrome we find, varicella zoster virus in more than half of cases, followed by herpes simplex virus (HSV), and then less frequently the Epstein-Barr virus. CMV-linked ARN syndrome remains very rare [1].

 It  affects both sexes with a slight male predominance, without preferential age, however two frequency peaks, were found, around 20 and 50 years old, related for the first to an attack by herpes simplex and for the second peak a varicella- zoster infection. And it is often found in immunocompetent individuals [1, 2].

The mechanism of retinal infection is probably R.eactivation in the central nervous system from a latent site of infection.

The main risk factor is a history of viral infections regardless of its location [3].

Several series have suggested a high prevalence of viral retinitis on a ground of genetic susceptibility. Holland and collegues, have demonstrated high prevalence of HLA-DQw7 antigen in patients with RNA syndrome than in the normal population, other genetic phenotypes one was highlighted such as Bw62, DR4 [1, 4]

ARN syndrome is classically revealed by a rapidly progressive visual impairment, most often unilateral, associated with redness, eye pain and myodesopsia.

Examination of the anterior segment may reveal granulomarous anterior uveitis, hypertonia, and inflammatory reaction in the anterior chamber.   Sometimes papillary and macular edema is associated to the retinal necrosis on fundus.

The diagnosis of this affection, is made on clinical presumption, no assessment should delay urgent treatment. Moreover, the detection of viral DNA by PCR technique, in aqueous humor or vitreous specimen is particularly interesting. Indeed PCR is very sensitive (80 to 96%) and requires only a small amount of sampling [2].

Viral necrotizing retinitis can be confused with various ocular involvement including extensive toxoplasmic retinitis, syphilis, endophthalmitis of parasitic origin, ocular lymphoma and necrotizing retinitis in the context of behcet's disease, therefore an    initial complete assessment is crucial without delaying the urgent therepeutique process.

The goal of treatment is to stop viral multiplication and the extention of the retinal   necrosis as well as inflammation, it is based essentially on intra-veinous antiviral associated with anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic treatment depending on virus isolated.

Acyclovir should be started at 10-13 mg/kg every 8 hours or 1500mg/m2/day intravenously (IV) for 5-10 days. This should be followed by acyclovir 800 mg five times daily orally for 6 weeks to 3 months. Some studies suggest oral therapy at beginning such as Valacyclovir given at a dose of 1000-2000 mg orally every 8 hours. This has good bioavailability and avoids the need for intravenous access [5].

A long term oral antiviral treatement is required to prevent recurrence. The visual prognostic is generally poor, severe complications may occur , such as retinal detachment , optic neuropathy and ischemic vasculopathy involving the macula can cause severe visual loss .

Conclusion

To conclude ARN is a rare but potentially visually threatening condition that can lead to blindness. First line therapy is intra-venous antiviral treatment, relayed by oral therapy to prevent recurrences. However, the cost of therapy is high and patient compliance can be a problem especially in developing countries which make the prognosis of this affection more fatal in these cases.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova