AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/199
1 Department of Maxillofacial Surgery Hospital of Specialities Rabat, Morocco.
2 Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat. Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Rajaa El Azzouzi, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery Hospital of Specialities; CHU Ibn Sina, Av. Abderrahim Bouabid, Rabat-Morocco. BP 1382 RP. 10001 Rabat, Maroc
Citation: Rajaa El Azzouzi, Khalil Harmali, Bouchra Dani, Malik Boulaadas, (2024), Case report: A rare case of an aggressive submandibular gland cancer revealed by a parietal-pleural metastasis : Case report and literature review, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 9(4); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/199
Copyright: © 2024, Rajaa El azzouzi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 13 March 2024 | Accepted: 19 March 2024 | Published: 28 March 2024
Keywords: submandibular gland; metastasis; mucoepidermoid carcinoma; case report
Around 10% of all salivary gland tumors are located in the sub-mandibular gland, with a high rate of malignant tumors. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma “MCE” represent 13 % of all sub-mandibular gland tumor and is reported to have an aggressive behavior and the most difficult to treat.
The purpose of this article is to report a case of 60-year-old patient diagnosed with a high grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of sub-mandibular gland revealed by a parietal-pleural metastasis in whom a surgical, radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment has been adapted, and by a literature review we will describe the clinical, histological, therapeutic features and the prognostic factors of this rare and aggressive histological type of sub-mandibular gland.
Salivary gland carcinomas represent less than 6% of malignant tumors of head and neck [1].
Parotid is the most common localization of these tumors among the major salivary glands, and palate is the most frequent site for minor salivary glands tumors.
Around 10% of all salivary gland tumors are located in the sub-mandibular gland, with a high rate of malignant tumors.
72% of submandibular gland tumors were diagnosed as adenoid cystic carcinoma, while mucoepidermoid carcinoma “MEC” represented 13% [2].
Complete surgical resection is the gold standard for MEC. The protocols for adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy are still matter of discussion.
We report a case of aggressive high grade MEC of sub mandibular gland reveled by a
parietal-pleural metastasis.
we report a case of a 60-year-old patient, chronic smoker of 40 packs a year, with no particular medical history, referred by a thoracic surgeon to our department for management of a right submandibular mass. The patient initially consulted for a right thoracic pain evolving for 1 month in a context of altered general condition, in whom imaging revealed a parietal-pleural lytic process of the anterior arch of the first rib of neoplastic appearance and undetermined primary or secondary origin (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Cervicothoracic CT scan in axial section showing a parietal-pleural lytic process of the anterior arch of the first rib.
For the past 2 months, the patient had also presented a painless right submandibular mass that was progressively enlarging, and which presented on clinical examination as a painless mass of the right submandibular gland, of stony consistency, not very mobile to the deep plane, approximately 5.5 cm long, with normal skin and no cervical adenopathies associated (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Images of the patient showing the right submandibular mass.
An extension work-up was performed:
Cervico-facial MRI revealed a well-limited lesional process with irregular contours at the expense of the right sub-mandibular gland, isosignal T2, discrete hyposignal T1, not fading in FAT SAT without associated cervical adenopathy or facing mandibular bone lysis (Figure 3,4).
Figure 3: IMR in axial section showing the submandibular gland tumor.
Figure 4: IMR in coronal and sagittal sections showing the submandibular gland tumor.
The patient underwent a right submandibulecto my under general anesthesia (Figure 5),
Figure 5: Macroscopic appearance of MCE of submandibular gland tumor.
the pathology and immunohistochemistry examinations revealed a diagnosis of a high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The multidisciplinary consultation meetings “RCP” decision was to perform lymph node dissection: classified as T4N1M1, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were completed.
Salivary gland carcinomas represent less than 6% of malignant tumors of head and neck [1].
Parotid is the most common localization of these tumors among the major salivary glands, and palate is the most frequent site for minor salivary glands tumors.
They form a heterogeneous group of tumors, with 24 subtypes according to the latest World Health Organization “WHO” classification [1]. Around 10% of all salivary gland tumors are located in the sub-mandibular gland, with a high rate of malignant tumors.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma accounts for between 3% and 10% of salivary tumors and 29% of malignant salivary gland tumors. The most common location is parotid (56.8%) followed by oral cavity (14%), oropharynx (9.5%), submandibular gland (6.8%), nasal mucosa (6.1%) and sublingual gland (1.3%) [3].
72% of submandibular gland tumors were diagnosed as adenoid cystic carcinoma, while mucoepidermoid carcinoma “MEC” represented 13% [2].
The prevalence is higher among women aged between 50 and 60 years.
MEC commonly presents as a painless swelling with pressure; however, symptoms vary with tumor size, the extension of the tumor and presence of lymph nodes or distant metastasis [4].
In the event of clinical suspicion of malignancy, ultrasound supplemented by a CT scan or MRI are the examinations of choice for assessing local extension and the presence
of adenopathy [5]. Some authors defend the value of ultrasound, especially in differentiating between benign and malignant nature. Images suggestive of malignancy are heterogeneous, poorly limited and more extensive, sometimes with associated adenopathy [6].
Surgical biopsy is to avoid in view of the risk of swarming. Extemporaneous examination on frozen sections may be indispensable.
The confirmation diagnosis is histological, MEC are composed of epidermoid cells, mucinous cells, and a variable proportion of intermediate cells. Several grading systems have been proposed, from low to high grade. The one adopted by the WHO is based on 5 criteria to define 3 grades of malignancy (cystic component less than less than 20%, nerve invasion, necrosis, at least at least 4 mitoses per 10 fields at high magnification, presence of anaplastic contingent).
Low-grade MEC: Mucosecretory cells predominate (> 50%). The squamous cells are well differentiated, and intermediate cells are rare. Their nuclei are regular and mitoses are rare.
High-grade MEC: less than 10% of cells are mucosecreting, squamous or intermediate cells predominate. Marked mitoses and nuclear irregularities.
Intermediate-grade MEC: tumors with intermediate characteristics between the two preceding types.
The grade of differentiation plays a crucial role in the long-term outcomes of oncology patients.
Submandibular gland MECs have been reported to have an aggressive behavior and are the most difficult to treat, since their location and nearby important structures (marginal mandibular nerve, hypoglossal nerve and lingual nerve), most of the time do not allow resection with disease-free margins [7].
Surgical management and the protocols for adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy depend on different factors including perineural or named nerve invasion, positive margins, high-grade tumors, extra glandular spread, positive lymph nodes and locally recurrent disease.
Salivary gland cancers are classified into 4 stages:
Stage I: Noninvasive tumors with no spread to lymph nodes and no distant metastasis
Stage II: An invasive tumor with no spread to lymph nodes and no distant metastasis
Stage III: Smaller tumors (< 4>
Stage IVa: Any invasive tumors with either no lymph node involvement or spread to only a single same-sided lymph node, but no metastasis.
Stage IVb: Any cancer, with more extensive spread to lymph nodes but no metastasis.
Stage IVc: Any cancer with distant metastasis.
The therapeutic management depends on each stage.
Stage I: Surgery, +/- radiotherapy (If it’s high grade on biopsy or if cancer could not be removed completely).
Stage II: Surgery (may include removal of lymph nodes). +/- radiotherapy (If it’s high grade on biopsy or if cancer could not be removed completely).
Stage III: Extensive surgery (removing the submandibular gland, nearby tissues and all lymph nodes in your neck on the same side) +/- radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy.
Stage IV: Extensive surgery + radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy +/- clinical trial of newer treatments
Most of the time Submandibular gland MECs do not allow resection with disease-free margins due to the difficulty of surgery and nearby important structures [7], and tend to recur of metastasize [2]. The current problem is to be able to determine the best therapeutic strategy in order to obtain the best compromise between recovery and sequel.
The prognosis is uncertain, with 25% recurrence and 10% metastases.
The evolution of these tumors is slow (recurrence after 7 to 10 years).
Low-grade carcinomas have a 5-year survival rate of 95%, compared with 40% for high-grade carcinomas. A translocation t(11 ;19)(q21 ;p13) is present in 70% of MECs, generating a
MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript, responsible for alteration of the
Notch pathway [8]. The presence of this translocation (never identified in high-grade carcinomas), is thought to have a good prognosis.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of submandibular gland is a very rare and aggressive malignant tumor, which makes it difficult to manage and challenging to develop a treatment guideline. Although a complete surgical resection is the gold standard, various treatment options such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy have been investigated.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
