Auctores adopts the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on publication ethics. Auctores is committed to endorsing the highest measures of publication ethics and takes all probable actions against publication misconduct as specified in the Code of Conduct, ethics developed by the (COPE) and stick on COPE guidelines for resolving cases of suspected misconduct and irregularities. We request our contributors, editors, reviewers and people encompassed in different steps of publication to follow the ethical guidelines to progress the significance of academic publishing.
We request our authors for a statement that the submitted work to Auctores journals and its material have not before been published and are not in being consideration for publication elsewhere.
Plagiarism detection is the step carried out in order to check the extent of content plagiarized in the article. For this we use universally acceptable ithenticate to detect the plagiarism of an article.
The peer review process is at the core of the triumph of scientific publishing. As part of our obligation to the enhancement of the peer review process to assist the scientific community in all aspects of publishing ethics, especially in cases of (suspected) duplicate submission or plagiarism. Auctores follow the rigorous and standard peer review process
It is the responsibility of Auctores to publish all accepted articles having satisfied editorial necessities according to the established criteria for publication.
Authors ensure that their work is original, if the authors have used the work or words of others this must be appropriately cited or quoted and make sure that the work has not been published and not under consideration elsewhere.
All authors should disclose in their manuscript if any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to impact the results or clarification of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the work should be disclosed.
Authorship should be mentioned those who have made a significant contribution to the commencement, design, implementation, data collection and writing of the reported study. All individuals who have made noteworthy contributions in the manuscript build up should be listed as co-authors.
Author(s) should furnish the details in the article if their submitting work was approved by the relevant research societies/communities/institutional review board. If human participants were involved, article must be stated by a statement that the experiments were undertaken with the understanding and appropriate informed consent of each. If experimental animals were used, the materials and methods (experimental procedures) section must clearly indicate that appropriate measures were taken to minimize pain or discomfort, and details of animal care should be provided.
In case, any reviewer believes that it is not feasible for him/her to complete review of article within assigned time then the same must be conversed to the editorial office, so that the article could be assigned to other relevant reviewers. Reviewer should maintain confidentiality regarding the information of authors and manuscript.
Reviewers should not consider article in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from viable, collaborative, or other relationships or influences with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the assigned article. We encourage reviewers to examine the article based on scientific excellence nevertheless on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry or political values of authors.
Reviews should be directed objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments it helps to enhance the quality of the article.
Editor should prepare the journal ethical policies and endorse among reviewers and scientific communities maintaining the highest level of integrity and standards.
Editors ought to make fair and transparent decisions and should report potential conflicts if any. Decisions must be given based on scientific excellence nevertheless on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry or political values of authors.
Editor should maintain the scientific communication with the editorial office and reviewer and suggesting reviewers and other editorial board members based on academic excellence.
The Editor in Chief/Editors and any Editorial Staff must not disclose any info about a submitted article to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.