Sildenafil Citrate Versus Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone in Prevention of Preterm Labor with Short Cervix

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/009

Sildenafil Citrate Versus Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone in Prevention of Preterm Labor with Short Cervix

  • Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali 1*
  • Khaled M Abdallah 1
  • Ahmed Abdelhamid 2

Obstetrics & Gynecology Department - Faculty of Medicine- South Valley University

*Corresponding Author: Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali, Obstetrics & Gynecology Department - Faculty of Medicine- South Valley University. Email: ayman_gamal007@yahoo.com

Citation: Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali , Khaled M Abdallah , Ahmed Abdelhamid, Sildenafil Citrate versus Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone in Prevention of Preterm Labor with Short Cervix .J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 2(1); DOI: 10.31579/2578-8965/009

Copyright: © 2018 Abd El-Naser Abd El-Gaber Ali et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 28 April 2018 | Accepted: 07 May 2018 | Published: 08 May 2018

Keywords: Sildenafil citrate – Nifedipine – Dydrogesrone - Preterm labor – Short cervix

Abstract

Background: Prevention of the premature birth occurrence remains  is considered one of the most tough challenges for obstetricians worldwide, mainly to avoid neonatal prematurity complications leading to short and long term morbidities additionally prematurity prevention will reduce premature neonatal mortality rates which is considered a major health concern of obstetricians, neonatologists and families.

Objective: To compare and contrast the efficacy of Sildenafil citrate, Nifedipine and Dydrogesrone in prevention of premature labor in gestations with short cervix.

 Setting: Obstetrics & Gynecology Departments, Faculties of medicine, south Valley and Al-Azhar (Asyut) Universities, Egypt.

Duration: from September 2014 to March 2018.

Patients And Methds:  the study was conducted on 300 pregnant women who randomly divided into three groups: Group I included 100 cases received Sildenafil citrate (Respatio tablet 20mg twice daily orally), Group II included     100 cases received Nifedipine (Epilat retard tablets 20mg twice daily orally) and Group III included 100 pregnant women received dydrogesreone 10 mg (Duphaston) twice daily orally.

Results: incidence of preterm labor was (9.37, 8.51 and 14.28) in (Group I, Group II and Group II) respectively. Mean ± SD of cervical length at 32 weeks of gestation was mildly statistically significant among groups (p value <0.05) but no significance in neonatal outcome (p value >0.05) except birth weight which had a highly statistically significant difference (p value < 0.001). There was a highly statistically significant difference among studied groups as regard to drug side effects in (p value <0.001).

Conclusion: Sildenafil citrate was as effective as Nifedipine and better than oral Dydrogesterone on myometrial relaxation and prevention of preterm birth in pregnant women who had short cervix.

Reccommendation: Sildenafil citrate could be one of the most successful agents in prevention of preterm labor in threatened preterm cases.

Introduction

Preterm labor is defined as delivery of fetus after 20 weeks and less than 37 completed  gestational weeks. Preterm birth is always a major obstetric healthcare issue worldwide [1,2]. It represents a major cause of neonatal, infant and child death and disability up to age of 5 years in the developed world and represents the leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in the whole world [3&4], about fifteen million premature neonates are born every year globally, and a million of them die because of prematurity complications [4,5]. Preterm babies are at greater risks of grave perinatal morbidities [6, 8]. Although many babies delivered prematurely had a normal and completely healthy life, some significant proportion experienced life-long disabilities and health issues [9]. The chief dilemma of premature births is its negative impact on neonates themselves, their families, and society as a whole in which there is significant healthcare costs due to perinatal health issues and long term disabilities [1, 4, 7, 10]. Prevention of preterm labor has the priority in health care system programs since preventive measures are superior than treatment protocols [11].

Prevention of preterm labor to be successful requires multiple approaches including public health efforts with educational health programs, modification of patient lifestyle, optimal obstetric protocols of healthcare, efficient approaches for prediction and diagnosis of threatened and established preterm labor and implementation of effective, tailored case management pathways according to case scienario [12].  Preconception intervention modalities e.g weight reduction in obese female population, nutritional supplementation for underweight women, and cessation of smoking have a favourable impact on premature birth rates and its clinical sequelae  [13,14]. Dydrogesreone is a progesterone stereoisomer acts at biochemical level as a selective progestin with a high receptor affinity, due to its retro-structure that binds to the progesterone receptor. Dydrogesreone is safe and have well acceptable tolerability. It is similar to natural progesterone hormone in molecular structure and pharmacological properties with sufficient oral bioavailability. 2–5 hours is the maximum time required for Dydrogesreone to reach peak plasma concentration levels after oral intake, 20 mg/day of Dydrogesterone is equivalent to 200mg of progesterone administered vaginally [15]. Nifedipine is a calcium channel blocker that could be used as an key tocolytic agent [16, 17]. The most substantial updated Cochrane review [18] concerning  calcium channel blockers displays that it could be used for tocolysis in prevention of acute threatened preterm delivery according to different 12 RCTs (10 of them used Nifedipine)  1029 patients were recruited in these trials. This review had concluded that, as comparison to any other tocolytic agent (as beta-mimetic mainly), calcium channel blockers (Nifedipine mainly) could diminish the hazardous  risk of premature labor within 7 days of administration. Sildenafil citrate in fact enhances smooth muscle relaxation by preventing cGMP degradation (the second messenger) by phosphodiesterase enzyme (PDE5) [19,20]. Moreover, the BKCa channels had been implicated by direct or indirect fashion in the sildenafil mode of action [21, 22].

Aim of Work

The aim of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of different tocolytic agents (Sildenafil citrate, Nifedipine and Dydrogesreone) in prevention of premature labor in gestations with short cervix.

Patients and Methods

The study was performed on 300 gestations from those visitingto Obs fetal medicine units of Obstetrics & Gynecology departments at South valley and Al-Azhar (Asyut) University Hospitals in the period from September 2014 to March 2018. Inclusive research criteria; 19 – 40 years old, BMI < 30> included 100 pregnant women received oral Dydrogesterone 10 mg (Duphaston) twice daily orally. To fulfill the target number of cases for this study (300 cases), we actually examined about 5000 pregnant women at mid-gestation.

Methods

 (1) Full clinical history taking including meticulous menstrual history for precise estimation of expected date of delivery (2) Full clinical physical examination and assesment, involving general, obstetric and local examinations (3) laboratory investigations e.g CBC, RBS, kidney and liver function tests (4) Sonographic examination and assesment: (a) Trans-abdominal sonography for fetal biometry (including BPD, HC, FL and AC), placental site and grading, amniotic fluid volume, fetal anomalies (b) Trans-vaginal sonography for cervical length (CL) measurement (at 24, 28 and 32 weeks of gestation).

Randomization and Blinding:

Recruited subjects were allocated randomly into 3 research groups by using a computer-generated randomization system (Microsoft office excels, 2010). The randomization list was hidden, expressed by sequential numbers and sealed in opaque envelopes just before start of allocation. Each number was linked to a ready prepared pack which contained sildenafil citrate (Respatio 20mg), calcium channel blocker (Epilat retard 20mg) or Dydrogesterone (Duphaston 10mg). The process of packing, numbering and sealing were performed by 2 different persons other than the investigator. Both investigator and observer were not aware about which drug cases had received (double-blinding).

Follow up: (a) All patients were followed up every two weeks until time of delivery and for one week later (b) Any episodes of premature labor contractions were clinically assessed carefully and recorded (c) If manifestations of threatened preterm labor progressed and not controlled with the regimen in this study, the patients were admitted to the hospital and magnesium sulphate in intravenous drip was commenced in a dose of 6 g in 500 ml glucose 5% and repeated every 6 hours till premature uterine contractions have resolved (d) Any complications developed were recorded. During follow up 12 cases dropped from the study (4 cases in group I, 6 cases in group II and 2 cases in group III) due to difficult communications or departure outside the area of study so the final number of cases continued in the study was 288 cases that delivered at South Valley and Al Azhar universities hospitals. Data of all patients finally was collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed.

Statistical analysis:

Data management and analysis were performed using Sigma Stat program; version 3.5 The Figures were done using Microsoft Excel. Data were statistically described in terms, mean±standard deviation (±SD) or number and percentage. Comparisons between categorical variables were done by the chi-square test. P-values was considered significant if <0>

Results

Incidence of preterm labor was (9.37, 8.51 and 14.28) in (Group I, Group II and Group II) respectively (table 3). Mean ± SD of cervical length at 32 weeks of gestation was statistically significant among studied groups with p value > 0.05 (table 2). There was a highly statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in birth weight with p value <0> 0.05. There was a highly statistically significant difference among studied groups in drugs side effects as headache, hot flushes and palpitations with p value < 0>

Table (1): Demographics data of the 3 studied groups

P value>0.05

Table (2): Comparison between the 3 research study groups  concerning cervical length measurement at 24, 28 and 32  gestational weeks
Table (3): Incidence of preterm labor in the 3 studied groups

* statistically significant

 

Figure (1): comparison between 3 research groups as regards neonatal birth weight in grams
Figure (2): comparison between 3 research groups as regards, transient tachypnea of new born, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal mortalities
Figure (3): Drugs side effects in the 3 studied research groups   

Discussion

Premature birth is one of the chief etiologies of perinatal mortality and disability in pediatric population principally correlated to the birth <34>

 Drugs adverse effects were statistically significant among the 3 studied groups we had found that headache, palpitation and hot flushes more obvious in group I and II but less in group III (figure 3). Many previous studies had been discussed the efficacy of progesterone, calcium channel blockers or any of the other tocolytics in prevention of threatened preterm labor, from those studies,  Ladan et al. [24] studied the comparative efficiency between Nifedipine and intramuscular progesterone, the success rates with intramuscular progesterone and oral Nifedipine  were 83% and 82.7%, respectively but there was no a statistically significant difference in the previously mentioned 2 agents  concerning the gestational age at time of delivery, mode of delivery, neonatal birth weight, in the rate of  NICU admission and hospitalization period,  These results and findings were in harmony with that reported in our study as regards to neonatal outcome but in our study the prevalence of preterm labor was higher in Dydrogesterone than Nifedipine this may can be explained because of the route and type of progesterone was different from that used in Ladan et al. The mechanisms of progesterone in prevention of preterm labor is by  maintainance of uterine quiescence by varioust actions such as relaxation of uterine smooth muscle, blocking oxytocin action, prevention of the gap junctions formation, reducing the oxytocin receptors concentration in uterine smooth muscles and inhibiting the production of  prostaglandins by amnion, chorion and decidua [25]. In a study performed by Wilasinee and Vorapong, [26] as the study had compared oral dydrogesreone (20 mg daily) and placebo in a randomized double blinded controlled trial, the study results were (Rates of recurrent uterine contractions in both groups were 87.5% versus 91.7%, p value was 0.64 and there were no differences in latency periods between both groups 32.7 ± 20.2 days versus 38.2 ± 24.2 days with p value was 0.39 so Wilasinee and Vorapong, study recommended that adjuvant treatment with oral Dydrogesterone 20 mg/day could not decline the rate of recurrent uterine contractions and prolong latency periods in preterm birth management in comparison with placebo and these  findings agreed with our study results. But in another study reported by Bomba-Opon et al. [27]  that was a retrospective review of usage of 200 mg progesterone vaginally after tocolysis by fenoterol or verapamil in threatened preterm birth and had found that it was associated with prolongation of gestational period in comparison to no medication (7.6 versus 6.3 weeks with p value was 0.039).

 In this study we selected dydrogesterone for investigation in order to overcome the disadvantages of oral progesterone that has a wide range variability in absorption and bioavailability among different individuals. Also about the dose 20 mg/day we had selected

because it had an equivalent dose to 200 mg of vaginal progesterone as mentioned in Ariea et al.’s study [28]. In Systematic review and meta-analysis reported by Agustín et al. [29] 26 trials that involving 2179 women were included. Nifedipine had been associated with a significant decline in the risk of preterm labor within 7 days of starting of treatment (relative risk, 0.82; 95% confidence interval , 0.70–.097) and < 34>Raheela et al.[30] had found that, myometrial relaxation caused by sildenafil citrate was a concentration-dependent manner, the relaxation of uterine muscles in presence of 20 mmol/L  of tetraethyl-ammonium was statistically significantly different (p value <0>Sher and Fisch study [31].

Conclusions

 

  1.  Sildenafil citrate and Nifedipine had nearly the same relaxing effect on myometrium that could prevent preterm birth in pregnant ladies with short cervix.
  2.  No significant differences among sildenafil, Nifedipine and Dydrogesterone as regard to neonatal outcome except birth weight, sildenafil group had a higher neonatal birth weight than Nifedipine and Dydrogesterone.
  3.  Headache, flushes were significance sildenafil and palpitation with Nifedipine.

Recommendations

Sildenafil citrate could be one of the most successful agents in prevention of premature labor in cases with threatened preterm labor more than Dydrogesterone with less palpitation  occurrence than Nifedipine.

A future randomized controlled trial with larger sample size and Sildenafil citrate greater dosage should be used for better evaluation of the benefits and adverse effects on fetus and mothers in case of its prophylactic use in

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao